Research Collaborations and Scientific productivity among the Research Universities in South Africa

Jacobs, Daisy and Pichappan, P. Research Collaborations and Scientific productivity among the Research Universities in South Africa., 2006 . In International Workshop on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics & Seventh COLLNET Meeting, Nancy (France), May 10 - 12, 2006. (Unpublished) [Conference paper]

[img]
Preview
PDF
61a.pdf

Download (218Kb) | Preview

English abstract

This study presents the share of 5 most productive South African institutions for the main stream scientific out put covering the 10 year periods of 1995-2004. This paper discusses the distribution of publications by institutions, Index of specialization, collaboration and pattern of co-authorship. The result shows that South African authors collaborate more frequently with international authors with a percentage of (73.99%) than did so for national collaboration which amount to (26.01%). This was confirmed statistically at the confidence level of P-value 0.025. A further non-parametric chi-square statistical analysis illustrated that there are significant differences in the proportion of co-authorship among the 5 institutions (p-value0.005).

Item type: Conference paper
Keywords: research collaborations South Afrida
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information. > BA. Use and impact of information.
Depositing user: Heather G Morrison
Date deposited: 27 Apr 2006
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:03
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/7476

References

"SEEK" links will first look for possible matches inside E-LIS and query Google Scholar if no results are found.

1. Abrahamson, E, Managerial fad and fashion: the diffusion and rejection of innovations. Academy of Management Review. 16(3): 586-612, 1991.

2. Abrahamson, E, Managerial fashion. Academy of Management Review. 21(1): 254-285, 1996.

3. Abrahamson, E. & Fairchild, G, Management fashion: lifecycles, triggers, and collective learning processes. Administrative Science Quarterly. 44, 708-740, 1999.

4. Berthelemot, N., Russell, Arvanitis, J., Waast, R & Gaillard, Science in Africa: An overview of mainstream scientific output. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on scientometrics and informatics, 2,469-484, 2001.

5. Godin, B., Robitaille, J., Côté, G, Profile of the Scientific Output of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 2001. Retrieved January 1, 2005 from: http://www.ost.qc.ca/OSTE/pdf/rapports/2001/eRapport_AAC.pdf

6. Ponzi,J.& Michael,K, Knowledge management: another management fad, 2003, Retrieved January 1,2005 from: http://pages.globetrotter.net/charro/HERMES9/ponzi_koenig.htm.

7. Qiu Liwen, a study of interdisciplinary research collaboration. Research Evaluation, 2 (3) 1992

8. Russell, M, The increasing role of international cooperation in science and technology research in Mexico. Scientometrics. 34 (1): 45-61, 1995

9. Rao,R., Quantitative methods for library and information science. New York: John Wiley &Sons.,1983

11.Van Raan, A, The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results. Scientometrics, 42(3): 423-428, 1998

12. Suramanyam, K., Biblometric studies of research collaboration: a review,Journal of of Informaton Science, 6 (1), 1983.


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item