Working with public libraries to enhance access to quality-assured health information for the lay public

Beard, Jill and de Vekey, Jane and Ball, David Working with public libraries to enhance access to quality-assured health information for the lay public., 2003 [Report]


Download (3247Kb) | Preview

English abstract

This study provides the results of a 22-month project to research whether web technology can be used to provide the lay public with quality-assured, evidence-based journal literature previously only available to health care professionals. The study documents the development of the demonstrator product and the results of its trial and evaluation, using action research methodologies, in selected public libraries and health information points in the UK. The literature review provides the context for the development of the provision of health information for the lay public and considers the issues surrounding the provision of e-journals. The study also provides an assessment of the potential requirements for a viable future web-based resource to provide consumers with the full text of quality-assured health information selected from journals used by health care professionals.

Item type: Report
Keywords: Health information, Information access, Public libraries
Subjects: D. Libraries as physical collections. > DC. Public libraries.
B. Information use and sociology of information. > BG. Information dissemination and diffusion.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HP. e-resources.
Depositing user: David Ball
Date deposited: 08 Aug 2006
Last modified: 14 Dec 2012 19:13


"SEEK" links will first look for possible matches inside E-LIS and query Google Scholar if no results are found.

Ball, D. 2002. Consortium purchase of electronic resources by public libraries in England. Intelligence-gathering for Resource. Stage one. Series RE/178. Resource. (Online) URL: (Accessed 3 April 2003).

Ball, M.J., and Lillis, J. 2001. E-health: transforming the physician/patient relationship. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 61, 1-10.

Beard, J. 2001. Quality Health Information for the lay public. In Healthy relationships: promoting health through public libraries: proceedings of a seminar held at Stamford, Lincolnshire on 31 October 2001. Loughborough: CPI, 13-22.

Beard, J., de Vekey, J., 2002. Healthinfo4u: developing a clear path to quality health information. The Beacon, Issue 2, October 2002, 11. (Online) URL: (Accessed 12 February 2003).

Beard, J., Madge, B. 2002. Healthinfo4u, an Interim Report on the British Library Concord Project No.6 June 2001- December 2002. In Thinking globally - acting locally: proceedings of the 8th European Conference of Medical and Health Libraries held at Cologne, Germany on 15-21 September 2002. (Online) URL: (Accessed 13 March 2003).

Beard, J., Mclean, F., 2002. Offering access to professional health information via public libraries. Health Information on the Internet, (26)10. (Online) URL: (Accessed 12 February 2003).

Berinstein, P. 1999. Through the looking glass: the whole document, images and all. Searcher, 7(1), 38.

Bingham, C.M., et al. 1998. The Medical Journal of Australia Internet peer-review study. The Lancet, 352, 441-45.

Black, T. R. 2002. Understanding Social Science Research. London: Sage Publications.

Branigan, T. 2001. Future workforce will cope with growing elderly. The Guardian. Friday 16 August. (Online) URL:,8150,775460,00.html (Accessed 26 March 2003).

Burden, C. et al. 2001. E-journals at the British Library: from selection to access. Information Services and Use. 21, 117-121.

Calzada, M.E., and Scariano, S.M. 1999. What is normal, anyway? Mathematics Teacher, 92(8), 682c.

Canadian Department for Health. Health Canada Diseases and Conditions. (Online) URL: (Accessed 5 June 2003).

Charnock, D. and Shepperd, S. 2002. Against Internet exceptionalism. British Medical Journal, 324 (7337), 556-7.

Commission of the European Communities. 2002a. e-Europe 2005: an information society for all. Brussels: CEC. COM(2002) 263 final. (Online) URL: (Accessed 7 March 2003)

Commission of the European Communities. 2002b. e-Europe 2002: quality criteria for health related websites. Brussels: CEC. COM(2002) 667 final. (Online) URL: (Accessed 7 March 2003).

Congressional Internet Caucus Advisory Committee (CICAC). 2002. A nation online: how Americans are expanding their use of the Internet. Washington, D.C. US Department of Commerce National Telecommunications and Information Administration, and the Economics and Statistics Administration. (Online) URL: (Accessed 7 March 2003).

Cornwall, A., and Jewkes, R. 1995. What is participatory research? Social Science Medicine. 41(12), 1667-1676.

Coulter, A. et al. 1999. Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough? British Medical Journal, 318 (7179), 318-22.

Curtis, S, et al. 2000. Approaches to sampling and case selection in qualitative research: examples in the geography of health. Social Science and Medicine, 50, 1001-1014.

Department for Work and Pensions. [1998]. Series RE/94. Disability in Great Britain. London: HMSO. (Online) URL: (Accessed 4 April 2003).

Department of Health. 1998. National Service Frameworks. London: HMSO. (Online) URL: (Accessed 7 March 2003).

Department of Health. NHS Direct Online Encyclopaedia. 2001 (Online) URL: (Accessed 4 June 2003).

Department of Health. 1991. Health of the nation: a consultative document for health in England Cm 1523. London: HMSO.

Department of Health. 1998. Information for health: an information strategy for the modern NHS 1998-2005 a national strategy for local implementation. London: HMSO.

Department of Health. 1999. Saving lives: our healthier nation. Cm 4836. London: HMSO.

Department of Health. 2000. NHS plan: a plan for investment, a plan for reform. Cm 4818-1. London: HMSO.

Department of Health. 2001a. Building the information core: implementing the NHS Plan. London: HMSO.

Department of Health. 2001b. The expert patient: a new approach to chronic disease management for the 21st century. London: HMSO.

Dickerson, S. and Brennan, P. 2002. The Internet as a catalyst for shifting power in provider-patient relationships. Nursing Outlook, 50, 195-203.

Ferguson, T. 2002. From patients to end users. British Medical Journal, 324 (7337), 555-6.

Forsstrum, J.J., and Rigby, M. 1999. Considerations on the quality of medical software and information services. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 56, 169-176.

General Practitioners Committee. 2001. Consulting in the modern world. London: BMA.

Graham, E. and Kiley, R. 2002. The Patient’s Internet Handbook. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd.

Grimson, J. and Grimson, W. 2002. Health care in the information society: evolution or revolution? International Journal of Medical Informatics, 66, 25-29.

Hammond, R. 2001. Negotiating the medical maze. Library Association Record, 103(4), April, 218-20.

Heron, J., and Reason, P. 2001. The practice of co-operative inquiry: research with rather than on people. In: P. Reason and H. Bradbury Eds. Handbook of Action Research. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 179-188.

Holmes-Rovner, M et al. 2001. Patient choice, modules for summaries of clinical effectiveness: a proposal. British Medical Journal, 322 (7287), 664-7.

ICM. 2001. The Guardian/ICM monthly poll – January 2001. The Guardian. 24 January. (Online) URL: (Accessed 7 March 2003).

Illman, J. 2000. Patient power. Nursing Times, 96(26), 28-30.

Kohane, I.S., and Altman, R.B. 2000. The new peer review. In Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Symposium. held at San Antonio, Texas on 9-13 November 2002, 433-437.

Ludbrook, J. 2002. Peer review of manuscripts. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 9(2), 105-108.

Mackay, D. 2000. Consumer health information. In: Booth, A. and Walton, G., Eds. Managing knowledge in health services. London: Library Association Publishing, 78–86.

McKenzie, P.J. 2002. Communication barriers and information-seeking counterstrategies in accounts of practitioner-patient encounters. Library & Information Science Research, 24, 31-47.

Milewa, T. et al. 2000. Patient education literature and help seeking behaviour: perspectives from an evaluation in the United Kingdom. Social Science & Medicine, 51, 463-475.

National Electronic Library for Health. Cochrane Library. (Online) URL: (Accessed 5 June 2003).

Nielson, J. 1997. The use and misuse of focus groups. (Online) URL: (Accessed 7 March 2003).

Office for National Statistics. 2001. Social Focus on Men. London: HMSO, 74.

Office for National Statistics. 2002. Social Focus in Brief: Ethnicity 2002. London: HMSO, 5.

Ottosson, S. 2003. Participation action research – a key to improved knowledge of management. Technovation, 23, 87-94.

Pedley, P. 2002. Having access to good content is not enough. Managing Information. Jan/Feb, 9(1), 16-17.

Purcell, G.P., et al. 2002. The quality of health information on the Internet. British Medical Journal, 324 (7337), 557-8.

Reason, P., and Bradbury, H., Eds. 2001. Handbook of Action Research. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Rowley, J. 2000. The question of electronic journals. Library Hi Tech, 18(1), 46-54.

Sacchetti, P., et al. 1999. The Internet and patient education-resources and their reliability: focus on a select urology topic. Urology, 53, 1117-1120.

Silberg, W.M., et al. 1997. Assessing, controlling and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: caveant lector et viewor – let the reader and viewer beware. Journal of the American Medical Association, 277(15), 1244-1245.

Smith-Barbaro, P.A., 2001. Factors associated with intended use of a web site among family practice patients. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 3(2). e17. (Online) URL: (Accessed 4 April 2003).

Sowden, A. and Forbes, C. 2001. Patient Information. Health Services Journal, 111(5744), 36-7.

Timmons, S. 2001. Use of the Internet by patients: not a threat to nursing but an opportunity? Nurse Education Today, 21, 104-108.

Wanless, D. 2002. Securing our future health: taking a long-term view. London: HMSO. (Online) URL: /consult_wanless_final.cfm (Accessed 7 March 2003).

BBC Health website

British Heart Foundation website

Budapest Open Access Initiative website

CancerBACUP website

CHIQ website

Health Canada website

HiQuality website

NeLH website

NHS Direct Online website

Open Society Institute website

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item