Editorial and publication delay of papers submitted to 14 selected food research journals. Influence of online posting. // Retraso editorial y de publicación de artículos presentados a 14 revistas seleccionadas sobre investigación de alimentos. Influencia de ponerlos online.

Amat, Carlos B. Editorial and publication delay of papers submitted to 14 selected food research journals. Influence of online posting. // Retraso editorial y de publicación de artículos presentados a 14 revistas seleccionadas sobre investigación de alimentos. Influencia de ponerlos online. Information Research, 2006. (In Press) [Journal article (Unpaginated)]

[img]
Preview
PDF
Manuscrito_delay.pdf

Download (165kB) | Preview

English abstract

Publication delay, chronological distance between completion of a scientific work and distribution of its achievements as a peer reviewed paper, is a negative phenomenon in scientific information dissemination. It can be further subdivided in successive stages corresponding to the peer review process and the technical preparation of accepted manuscripts. Formal online posting in electronic versions of journals has been considered as a shortening of the process. Objectives: To determine publication delay in a group of leading Food Research journals, as well as factors affecting this lag and also to compute the effect of formal online posting on the distribution of papers in electronic form. Secondary objective is also to study the possible effect of informal posting of papers through some repositories on the publication delay in the field. Methods: 14 Food Research journals were selected and 4836 papers published in 2004 were examined. Dates of first submission, submission of revised manuscripts, acceptation, online posting and final publication were recorded for each paper. Analysis: Data collected were analyzed using XLStat and SigmaPlot. ANOVA was performed with BMDP package for significance analysis of differences among journals. Results: average publication delay of papers submitted to the set of selected journals is 348 ± 104 days, with European Food Research and Technology and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry showing the shortest delays. Total delay strongly depends on the peer review process. On average, 85,75 % of manuscripts are corrected prior to their acceptance by journals. Online posting of papers prior to their print publication reduces total delay in about 29 %. On average, a paper is posted online 260 days after its submission to the set of journals. Conclusions: Publication delay of papers is strongly dependent on the peer review process, which affects most of the manuscripts in the food research field. Advanced online publication through formal posting at the editor’s sites only slightly reduces the time between reception and final publication of papers.

Item type: Journal article (Unpaginated)
Keywords: Publication delay; Food research; Peer reviewed journals; Online posting; Publication lapse; Publication speed; Time lags; Scientific communication; Scientific literature
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BG. Information dissemination and diffusion.
Depositing user: Carlos Benito
Date deposited: 08 Nov 2006
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:04
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/8020

References

Adams, S. 2003, A comparison of early publication practices in the United States and Europe, World Patent Information, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 117-122.

Bhattacharjee, S., Tung, Y., & Pathak, B. 2004, Author Experiencies with the IS Journal Review Process, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 13, pp. 629-653.

Braun, T., Diospatonyi, I., & Horvai, G. 2001, Publication lapse of journals of analytical chemistry, Magyar Kemiai Folyoirat, vol. 107, no. 7-8, pp. 313-317.

Carson, J. & Wyatt, H. V. 1983, Delays in the Literature of Medical Microbiology - Before and After Publication, Journal of Documentation, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 155-165.

Diospatonyi, I., Horvai, G., & Braun, T. 2001a, Publication speed in analytical chemistry journals, Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1452-1456.

Diospatonyi, I., Horvai, G., & Braun, T. 2001b, The publication speed of information in bibliographic chemical databases, Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1446-1451.

Egghe, L. 2000, The influence of publication delays on the observed aging distribution of scientific literature, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 158-165.

European Commission 2002, An assessment of the implications for basic genetic engineering research of failure to publish, or late publication of, papers on subjects which could be patentable as required under Article 16(b) of Directive 98/44/EC on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions. REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND COUNCIL [SEC(2002) 50].

Garvey, W. D. & Griffith, B. C. 1964, Scientific Information Exchange in Psychology, Science, vol. 146, no. 3652, pp. 1655-1659.

Kling, R. & Swygart-Hobaugh, A. 2002, The Internet and the Velocity of Scholarly Journal Publishing WP- 02-12. Center for Social Informatics, Indiana University. Retrieved on 15, May 2006 from: http://rkcsi.indiana.edu/archive/CSI/WP/WP02-12B.html

Luwel, M. 1998, Publication delays in the science field and their relationship to the ageing of scientific literature, Scientometrics, vol. 41, no. 1-2, pp. 29-40.

Nickerson, SC (2004) Journal of Dairy Science 2003 Editorial Report. Journal of Dairy Science, 87, (4), 1122-1129.

Novek, P.S. (2006) “Peer to Patent”: Collective Intelligence and Intellectual Property Reform. 15th revision. Retrieved on May 19, 2006 from The Peer to Patent Project: http://peertopatent.jot.com/WikiHome

Pask, J. M. 1988, Publication time lags of economics and business working papers, Collection Managemet, vol. 10, no. 1-2, pp. 63-68.

Rogers, G.W. (2006) Journal of Dairy Science 2005 Editorial Report. Journal of Dairy Science, 89 (5), 1369-1371.

Roland, G. C. & Kirpatrick, R. A. 1975, Time lapse between hypothesis and publication in the medical sciences, New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 292, no. 24, pp. 1273-1276.

Schroter, S., Tite, L., & Smith, R. 2005, Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors, British Medical Journal, vol. 330, p. 756.

Seglen, P. O. 1997, Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research, British Medical Journal, vol. 314, no. 7079, pp. 498-502.

Sittig, D. & Kaalasittig, J. 1995, A Quantitative Ranking of the Biomedical Informatics Serials, Methods of Information in Medicine, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 397-410.

Stern, J. & Shimes, R. 1997, Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects, British Medical Journal, vol. 315, pp. 640-645.

Strevens, M. 2003, The Role of the Priority Rule in Science, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 55-79.

Swan, A. & Brown, S. 2003, Authors and electronic publishing: what authors want from the new technology, Learned Publishing, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 28-33.

Tobin, M. J. 2004, Assessing the Performance of a Medical Journal, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 169, no. 12, pp. 1268-1272.

Trivedi, P. 1993, An analysis of publication lags in Econometrics, Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 93-100.

van Rooyen S 2001, The evaluation of peer-review quality, Learned Publishing, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 85-91.

Wills, M. & Wills, G. 1996, The ins and outs of electronic publishing, Internet Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 10-21.

Yokote, G. & Utterback, R. A. 1974, Time Lapses in Information Dissemination: Research Laboratory to Physician's Office, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 251-257.

Yu, G. & Li, Y. J. 2006, A scientometric assessment of the information loss caused by the delays in publication of Chinese science journals, Journal of Information Science, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 78-87.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item