E-Mail Interviewing in Qualitative Research: A Methodological Discussion

Meho, Lokman I. E-Mail Interviewing in Qualitative Research: A Methodological Discussion. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, vol. 57, n. 10, pp. 1284-1295. [Journal article (Print/Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
PDF
email-interviewing.pdf

Download (127Kb) | Preview

English abstract

This article summarizes findings from studies that employed electronic mail (e-mail) for conducting indepth interviewing. It discusses the benefits of, and the challenges associated with, using e-mail interviewing in qualitative research. The article concludes that while a mixed mode interviewing strategy should be considered when possible, e-mail interviewing can be in many cases a viable alternative to face-to-face and telephone interviewing. A list of recommendations for carrying out effective e-mail interviews is presented.

Item type: Journal article (Print/Paginated)
Keywords: E-mail interviewing, Interviewing, Interviews, Qualitative research, Internet research, Methodology, Research methods, Data collection methods, Data gathering instruments
Subjects: A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AZ. None of these, but in this section.
B. Information use and sociology of information. > BZ. None of these, but in this section.
Depositing user: Lokman I. Meho
Date deposited: 13 Nov 2006
Last modified: 14 Dec 2012 19:26
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/8377

References

"SEEK" links will first look for possible matches inside E-LIS and query Google Scholar if no results are found.

Beck, C.T. (2005). Benefits of participating in Internet interviews: Women helping women. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 411–422.

Birnbaum, M.H. (2004). Human research and data collection via the Internet. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 803–832.

Bowker, N., & Tuffin, K. (2004). Using the online medium for discursive research about people with disabilities. Social Science Computer Review, 22(2), 228–241.

Brownlow, C., & O’Dell, L. (2002). Ethical issues for qualitative research in on-line communities. Disability & Society, 17, 685–694.

Burton, L.J., & Bruening, J.E. (2003). Technology and method intersect in the online focus group. Quest, 55, 315–327.

Chase, L., & Alvarez, J. (2000). Internet research: The role of the focus group. Library & Information Science Research, 22, 357–369.

Couper, M.P. (2000). Web surveys: A review of issues and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 464–494.

Curasi, C.F. (2001). A critical exploration of face-to-face interviewing vs. computer-mediated interviewing. International Journal of Market Research, 43(4), 361–375.

Denscombe, M. (2003). The good research guide. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2005). The sage handbook of qualitative research. (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

Dijk, T.A.V. (1997). Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Dillman, D.A. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Dommeyer, C.J., & Moriarty, E. (2000). Comparing two forms of an e-mail survey: Embedded vs. attached. International Journal of Market Research, 42(1), 39–50.

Ess, C. (2002). Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee. Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR). Retrieved February 27, 2005, from http://www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf.

Eysenbach, G., & Till, J.E. (November 10, 2001). Ethical issues in qualitative research on Internet communities. British Medical Journal, 323(7321), 1103–1105.

Fidel, R. (1993). Qualitative methods in information retrieval research. Library & Information Science Research, 15(3), 219–247.

Foster, G. (1994). Fishing with the Net for research data. British Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 91–97.

Frankel, M.S., & Siang, S. (1999). Ethical and legal aspects of human subjects research on the Internet. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). Retrieved February 27, 2005, from http://www.aaas.org/spp/sfrl/projects/intres/report.pdf.

Frost, F. (1998). Electronic surveys: New methods of primary data collection. In European Marketing Academy, Proceedings of the 27th EMAC Conference: Marketing, Research and Practice (1998). Stockholm: EMAC.

Gaiser, T.J. (1997). Conducting on-line focus groups: A methodological discussion. Social Science Computer Review, 15(2), 135–144.

Groves, R.M., Dillman, D.A., Eltinge, J.L., & Little, R.J.A. (2002). Survey nonresponse. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Groves, R.M., Fowler, F.J., Couper, M.P., Lepkowski, J.M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2004). Survey methodology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Gubrium, J.F., & Holstein, J.A. (2002). Handbook of interview research: Context & method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Herring, S.C. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamin Publishing Company.

Herring, S.C. (2002). Computer-mediated communication on the Internet. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 109–168.

Hodgson, S. (2004). Cutting through the silence: A sociological construction of self-injury. Sociological Inquiry, 74(2), 162–179.

Internet World Stats. (2005). Internet World Stats: Usage and population statistics. Retrieved May 25, 2005, from http://www.internetworldstats.

com/ Karchmer, R.A. (2001). The journey ahead: Thirteen teachers report how the Internet influences literacy and literacy instruction in their K–12 classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(4), 442–466.

Kennedy, T.L.M. (2000). An exploratory study of feminist experiences in cyberspace. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3(5), 707–719.

Kim, B.S.K., Brenner, B.R., Liang, C.T.H., & Asay, P.A. (2003). A qualitative study of adaptation experiences of 1.5-generation Asian Americans. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 9(2), 156–170.

Knapp, M.L., & Daly, J.A. (2002). Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Kraut, R., Olson, J., Banaji, M., Bruckman, A., Cohen, J., & Couper, M. (2004). Psychological research online: Report of board of scientific affairs’ advisory group on the conduct of research on the Internet. American Psychologist, 59(2), 105–117.

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Lehu, J-M. (2004). Back to life! Why brands grow old and sometimes die and what managers then do: An exploratory qualitative research put into the French context. Journal of Marketing Communications, 10, 133–152.

Levinson, P. (1990). Computer conferencing in the context of the evolution of media. In L.M. Harasim (Ed.), Online education: Perspectives on a new environment (pp. 3–14). NY: Praeger.

Madge, C., & O’Connor, H. (2002). On-line with e-mums: Exploring the Internet as a medium for research. Area, 34(1), 92–102.

Madge, C.,&O’Connor,H. (2004). Online methods in geography educational research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 28(1), 143–152.

Mann, C., & Stewart, F. (2000). Internet communication and qualitative research: Ahandbook for researching online. London: Sage Publications.

Matheson, K. (1992). Women and computer technology: Communicating for herself. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 66–88). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Meho, L.I. (2001). The information-seeking behavior of social science faculty studying stateless nations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Meho, L.I., & Tibbo, H.R. (2003). Modeling the information-seeking behavior of social scientists: Ellis’s study revisited. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(6), 570–587.

Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Moon, Y. (2000). Intimate exchanges: Using computers to elicit selfdisclosure from consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 323–339.

Murray, C.D. (2004). An interpretive phenomenological analysis of the embodiment of artificial limbs. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(16), 963–973.

Murray, C.D., & Harrison, B. (2004). The meaning and experience of being a stroke survivor: An interpretive phenomenological analysis. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(13), 808–816.

Murray, C.D., & Sixsmith, J. (1998). E-mail: Aqualitative research medium for interviewing? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1(2), 103–121.

Murray, P.J. (1995). Research from cyberspace: Interviewing nurses by e-mail. Health Informatics, 1(2), 73–76.

Murray, P.J. (1996). Nurses’ computer-mediated communications on NURSENET: A case study. Computers in Nursing, 14(4), 227–234.

Olivero, N., & Lunt, P. (2004). Privacy versus willingness to disclose in e-commerce exchanges: The effect of risk awareness on the relative role of trust and control. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(2), 243–262.

Oppermann, M. (1995). E-mail surveys: Potentials and pitfalls. Marketing Research, 7(3), 29–33.

Panteli, N. (2002). Richness, power cues and email text. Information & Management, 40(2), 75–86.

Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Persichitte, K.A., Young, S., & Tharp, D.D. (1997). Conducting research on the Internet: Strategies for electronic interviewing. In Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the 1997 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (19th, Albuquerque, NM, February 14–18, 1997).Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.

Pettigrew K.E., Fidel, R., & Bruce, H. (2001). Conceptual frameworks in information behavior. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 35, 43–78.

Pittenger D.J. (2003). Internet research: An opportunity to revisit classic ethical problems in behavioral research. Ethics&Behavior, 13(1), 45–60.

Presser, S., Couper, M.P., Lessler, J.T., Martin, E., Martin, J., Rothgeb, J.M., et al. (2004). Methods for testing and evaluating survey questions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1), 109–130.

Robert, L.P., & Dennis, A.R. (2005). Paradox of richness: A cognitive model of media choice. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48(1), 10–21.

Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H.E. (2001). The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

Schneider, S.J., Kerwin, J., Frechtling, J., & Vivari, B.A. (2002). Characteristics of the discussion in online and face to face focus groups. Social Science Computer Review, 20(1), 31–42.

Selwyn, N., & Robson, K. (1998). Using e-mail as a research tool. Social Research Update, 21. Retrieved from http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/sru/ SRU21.html.

Sharf, B.F. (1999). Beyond netiquette: The ethics of doing naturalistic discourse research on the Internet. In Steve Jones (Ed.), Doing Internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the Net (pp. 243–256). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Shaw, D., & Davis, C.H. (1996). Modern Language Association: Electronic and paper surveys of computer-based tool use. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(12), 932–940.

Singer, E., & Levine F.J. (2003). Protection of human subjects of research: Recent developments and future prospects for the social sciences. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67(1), 148–164.

Strauss, A.L., & Corbin, J.M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Taylor, S.J., & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Thurlow, C., Tomic, A., & Lengel, L.B. (2004). Computer mediated communication: Social interaction and the Internet. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Tidwell, L.C., & Walther, J.B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 317–348.

Tourangeau, R. (2004). Survey research and societal change. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 775–801.

Underhill, C., & Olmsted, M.G. (2003). An experimental comparison of computer-mediated and face-to-face focus groups. Social Science Computer Review, 21(4), 506–512.

Walther, J.B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3–43.

Walther, J.B., Anderson, J.F., & Park, D.W. (1994). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated communication: A meta-analysis of social and antisocial communication. Communication Research, 21, 460–487.

Wang, P. (1999). Methodologies and methods for user behavioral research. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, 53–99.

Weber, R.P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Young, S., Persichitte, K.A., & Tharp, D.D. (1998). Electronic mail interviews: Guidelines for conducting research. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 4(4), 291–299.


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item