Readers’ attitudes to self-archiving in the UK

Miller, Rhiannon Macfie Readers’ attitudes to self-archiving in the UK., 2006 MSc dissertation thesis, Napier University. [Thesis]

[img]
Preview
 PDF
Rhiannon_Miller_self-archiving2006.pdf
Download (5MB) | Preview

English abstract

The online self-archiving by authors of their scholarly articles has been proposed as an alternative to author-pays open access publication, but has the potential to undermine journal publisher income if the ready availability of self-archived articles leads to a drop in subscriptions. This study investigated the awareness of self-archiving and use of self-archived articles in a survey of a mainly academic population including both authors and non-authors, and looks at their attitudes to self-archived papers and whether they view them as an authoritative alternative to subscription access. In total, 70% of respondents had heard of self-archiving, though only 15% knew a lot about it, and 71% had used self-archived papers. These proportions are higher than in previous studies, suggesting that awareness has grown. Most self-archived papers used came from websites rather than repositories, particularly among those whose awareness of self-archiving was low. Use of self-archived articles was greater amongst those who had published more papers and also depended strongly on subject field – use and awareness were both particularly low in the field of medicine. People who were more aware of self-archiving were less likely to view the publisher’s official version as the only authoritative version and more likely not to care about the online location of articles. Moreover, authors who had self-archived tended to archive the publisher’s official version regardless of whether they were permitted to. These results suggest that the awareness of self-archiving is currently mostly limited to academic authors and is unlikely to grow beyond this in the short term. However, in the long term, the combination of high rates of self-archiving of the publisher’s official version, coupled with the devaluation of the journal as the authoritative source of material together with increased convenience of access to self-archived material, could result in fewer people accessing articles through subscription-based methods.

Item type: Thesis (UNSPECIFIED)
Keywords: self-archiving, institutional repositories, subject repositories
Subjects: E. Publishing and legal issues. > ED. Intellectual property: author's rights, ownership, copyright, copyleft, open access.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HS. Repositories.
E. Publishing and legal issues. > EB. Printing, electronic publishing, broadcasting.
Depositing user: Rhiannon Miller
Date deposited: 20 Nov 2006
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:05
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/8413

References

Albanese, A. (2005). Blackwell offers open access plan. Library Journal, 130(6), 20.

Albanese, A. (2004a). Publishers protest at NIH. Library Journal, 129(14), 17.

Albanese, A. (2004b). Report: open access cheaper. Library Journal, 129(10), 24.

Albanese, A. R. (2005). Life after the NIH. Library Journal, 130(7), 56.

Allen, J. (2005) Interdisciplinary differences in attitudes towards deposit in institutional repositories. Masters dissertation. Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester. http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00005180/

Anderson, R. (2004). Author disincentives and open access. Serials Review, 30(4), 288-291.

Andrew, T. (2003). Trends in self-posting of research material online by academic staff. Ariadne, 37, http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue37/andrew/ (accessed 29 September 2006).

Anon. (2004). Open access: Publicly funded research results should be available to all. Financial Times Nov 9, 2004 p.18.

Anon. (2005). Science and technology: who pays the piper…; scientific publishing. The Economist, 374(8413), 82.

Antelman, K. (2006). Self-archiving practice and the influence of publisher policies in the social sciences. Learned Publishing, 19, 85–95.

Ashburner, M., Ashmore, J., & al., e. (2005). Open letter from Fellows of the Royal Society regarding the Society's position statement on open access. http://www.frsopenletter.org/ (accessed 29 September 2006).

Awre, C. (2003). Open access and the impact on publishing and purchasing. Serials, 16, 205–208.

Baldwin, C. (2004). What do societies do with their publishing surpluses? ALPSP and Blackwell Survey. http://www.alpsp.org/publications/pub8.htm (accessed 20 January 2006).

Banks, P. (2004). Open access: a medical association perspective. Learned Publishing, 17, 135-142.

Belew, R. K. (2005). Scientific impact quantity and quality: analysis of two sources of bibliographics data. http://www.cogsci.ucsd.edu/~rik/papers/belew05-iqq.pdf (accessed 3 October 2006).

Bernard Wysocki, Jr (2004). Journals Resist Free Access To Medical Data. Wall Street Journal Oct 28, 2004 p.B.1.

Bjork, B.-C. (2005). A lifecycle model of the scientific communication process. Learned Publishing, 18, 165-176.

Bosc, H., & Harnad, S. (2005). In a paperless world a new role for academic libraries: providing open access. Learned Publishing, 18, 95-100.

Bosch, S. (2005). Buy, build, or lease: managing serials for scholarly communications. Serials Review, 31(2), 107-115.

Byrd, G. D., Bader, S.A., & Mazzaschi, A.J. (2005). The status of open access publishing by academic societies. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93, 423–424.

Carr, L., & Harnad, S. (2005). Keystroke Economy: A Study of the Time and Effort Involved in Self-Archiving. www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Temp/Keystroke3edited.doc (accessed 12 January 2006).

Chesler, A. (2004). Open access: a review of an emerging phenomenon. Serials Review, 30(4), 292-297.

Clark, N., & Scherlen, A. (2005). The balance point: looking at journals from both sides. Serials Review, doi: 10.1016/j.serrev.2005.08.003

Cockerill, M. (2004). The benefits to scientists of open access scientific publishing provided by the internet are too significant to be ignored,. Financial Times Nov 26, 2004 p.13.

Conference on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities. (2003). Berlin declaration on open access to knowledge in the sciences and humanities. http://www.zim.mpg.de/openaccess-berlin/berlin_declaration.pdf

Cookson, C. (2005). Scientists reignite open access debate: publicly funded research. Financial Times, Aug 31, 2005, p.4.

Costello, A., & Osrin, D. (2004). Open-access publishing. The Lancet, 364(9428), 25-26.

Crawford, B. (2003). Open-access publishing: where is the value? The Lancet, 362(9395), 1578–1580. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14749-6

Crawford, W. (2005). Open access and survivable libraries. EContent, 28(6), 42.

Daoutis, C., & Price, K. (2006) The development of an institutional repository at the University of Surrey: a feasability study. Report. University of Surrey, Surrey.

Davis, P., Ehling, T., Habicht, O., How, S., Saylor, J.M., & Walker, K. (2004). Report of the CUL Task Force on Open Access Publishing Presented to the Cornell University Library Management Team August 9, 2004. Cornell University Library. Technical Reports and Papers.

Butler, D. (2003). Scientific publishing: who will pay for open access? Nature, 425, 554–555. doi: 10.1038/425554a

Doyle, B. (2005). Opening access to content. EContent, 28(6), 28.

Ellen, P. (2004). Warning: open access may be hazardous to the health of your scientific society. BioScience, 54, 1060-1063.

Enderby, J. (2004). Internet upstarts v traditional publishers. Financial Times Nov 26, 2004 p.13.

Eysenbach, G. (2006). Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biology, 4, 692–698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157

Frank, M., Reich, M., & Ra'anan, A. (2004). A not-for-profit publisher's perspective on open access. Serials Review, 30(4), 281-287.

Fried Foster, N., & Gibbons, S. (2005). Understanding faculty to improve content recruitment for institutional repositories. D-Lib Magazine, 11, http://dlib.org/dlib/january05/foster/01foster.html (accessed 29 September 2006).

Friend, F. J. (2004). How can there be open access to journal articles? Serials, 17, 37–40.

Gadd, E., Oppenheim, C., & Probets, S. (2003a). RoMEO studies 2: how academics want to protect their open-access research papers. Journal of Information Science, 29(5), 333–356. doi: 10.1177/01655515030295002

Gadd, E., Oppenheim, C., & Probets, S. (2003b). RoMEO studies 3: how academics expect to use open access research papers. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 35(3), 171-187.

Gadd, E., Oppenheim, C., & Probets, S. (2003c). RoMEO studies 4: an analysis of journal publishers' copyright agreements. Learned Publishing, 16, 293-308. doi: 10.1087/095315103322422053

Gannon, F. (2005). Open access: scientists as paradoxical consumers. Learned Publishing, 18, 295-299.

Gass, A. (2005). Paying to free science: costs of publication as costs of research. Serials Review, 31(2), 103-106.

Gedye, R. (2004). Open access is only part of the story. Serials Review, 30(4), 271-274.

Goodman, D. (2004). The criteria for open access. Serials Review, 30(4), 258-270.

Goodman, D. (2005). Open access: what comes next? Learned Publishing, 18, 13-23.

Goodman, D., & Foster, C. (2004). Special focus on open access: issues, ideas, and impact. Serials Review, 30(4), 257-257.

Gregory, P. (2004). Open-access model to fund scholarly publishing has failed in the past. Financial Times Jun 7, 2004 p.16.

Guédon, J.-C. (2004). The "green" and "gold" roads to open access: the case for mixing and matching. Serials Review, 30(4), 315-328.

Hajjem, C., Harnad, S., & Gingras, Y. (2005). Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation impact. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin. Cited in http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/11688/ (accessed 2 October 2006)

Ham, M. F., Namtini, S. S., Luo, W.-J., & Xu, J.-X. (2004). Open-access publishing. The Lancet, 364(9428), 24-25.

Hangarter, R. (2005). Worrisome Profit Grab in Scholarly Publishing. Wall Street Journal Jun 21, 2005 p.A.17.

Harnad, S. (2001). Research access, impact and assessment. Times Higher Education Supplement, 1487, 16. http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Tp/thes1.html

Harnad, S. (2003). Open access to peer-reviewed research through author/institution self-archiving: maximizing research impact by maximizing online access. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 49, 337–342.

Harnad, S. (2005a). Fast-Forward on the Green Road to Open Access: The Case Against Mixing Up Green and Gold. Ariadne, 42. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue42/harnad/ (accessed 23 November 2005).

Harnad, S. (2005b). Southampton workshop on UK institutional open access repositories. Serials Review, 31, 175–177.

Harnad, S. (2005). Southampton workshop tackles open access. Information Today, 22(3), 1.

Harnad, S., & Brody, T. (2004). Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10, http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/edoc/aw/d-lib/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad.html (accessed 26 November 2005).

Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallieres, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y., Oppenheim, C., Stamerjohanns, H., & Hilf, E., R. (2004). The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access. Serials Review, 30(4), 310-314.

Harris, E. (2005). Institutional repositories: is the open access door half open or half shut? Learned Publishing, 18, 85-90.

Hawkins, D. T. (2005). Does open access publishing really work in practice? Information Today, 22(1), 40.

Hernon, P., & Schwartz, C. (2005). Open access to research. Library & Information Science Research, 27(2), 139-140.

Hey, J. M. N., Simpson, P., & Carr, L. A. (2005). The TARDis route map to Open Access: developing an institutional repository model. Paper presented at the ELPUB 2005 Conference on Electronic Publishing, Kath. Univ. Leuven, 2005.

House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. (2004). Scientific publications: free for all? The Stationery Office, London.

Hubbard, C., Tamber, P., S, Lin, V., Furler, L., & Duckett, S. (2005). The implications of open access publishing for the medical community. Evidence-Based Healthcare and Public health, 9(6), 371-373.

Stevenson, I. (2004). Is open access the new vanity publishing? Learned Publishing, 17, 83-84.

IRRA Project. (2006). IRRA: Institutional Repositories for Research Assessment: A JISC Project. http://irra.eprints.org/about.html (accessed 29 September 2006).

Jacsó, P. (2003). Proxy Searching of Non-Searchable and Poorly Searchable Open Access Archives of Digital Scholarly Journals. In Digital Libraries: Technology and Management of Indigenous Knowledge for Global Access. (pp. 552–555). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

Jacsó, P. (2005). Google Scholar and The Scientist. http://www2.hawaii.edu/~jacso/extra/gs/ (accessed 3 October 2006).

JISC. (2005a). Open Access. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/JISC-BP-OpenAccess-v1-final.pdf (accessed 30 November 2005).

JISC. (2005b). Digital repositories: helping universities and colleges. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/JISC-BP-Repository(HE)-v1-final.pdf (accessed 30 November 2005).

Willinsky, J. (2003). Scholarly associations and the economic viability of open access. Journal of Digital Information, 4(2), http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v04/i02/Willinsky/ (accessed 26 November 2005)

Jones, M. (2003). Archiving e-journals consultancy – final report. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/ejournalsfinal.pdf (accessed 2 October 2006).

Jongejan, A. (2004). The formula works, so don't tinker with it. Financial Times May 26, 2004 p.16.

Hunter, K. (2005). Critical issues in the development of STM journal publishing. Learned Publishing, 18, 51-55.

Kaufmann-Wills Group. (2005). The facts about Open Access. http://www.alpsp.org/publications/pub11.htm (accessed 20 January 2006).

Kim, J. (2005). Finding Documents in a Digital Institutional Repository: DSpace and Eprints. Paper presented at the 42 Proceedings 68th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST), Charlotte, NC, USA, 2005.

King, D. (2004). Who is going to pay for Open Access publishing? Paper presented at the Cologne Summit on Open Access Publishing, Cologne, 2004. http://www.zbmed.de/summit/PPking.pdf (accessed 26 November 2006).

Kirsop, B., & Chan, L. (2005). Transforming access to research literature for developing countries. Serials Review, doi:10.1016/j.serrev.2005.09.003

Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2006). Google Scholar Citations and Google Web/URL Citations: A Multi-Discipline Exploratory Analysis. Paper presented at the Proceedings International Workshop on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics & Seventh COLLNET Meeting, Nancy, France, 2006. http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00006416/

Kurtz, M.J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C., Demleitner, M., Henneken, E., & Murray, S.S. (2005). The effect of use and access on citations. Information Processing & Management, 41(6), 1395-1402.

Lafferty, M. (2003). Making scholarly communication accessible: the Budapest Open Access Initiative. http://www.unc.edu/~melaffer/BOAI/BOAI.pdf (accessed 4 October 2006)

Lamb, C. (2004). Open access publishing models: opportunity or threat to scholarly and academic publishers? Learned Publishing, 17, 143-150.

Law, S.M., Lowry, R. E., Motherswell, M.G., & Cody, S.M. (no date) The costs of electronic publishing of scholarly works. http://www.ryerson.ca/gcm/cep/THE_COSTS_OF_ELECTRONIC_PUBLISHING.pdf (accessed 2 October 2006)

Lawrence, S. (2001). Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact. Nature, 411, 521–522. doi: 10.1038/35079151

Liesegang, T.J., Schachat, A., P., & Albert, D.M. (2005). The open access initiative in scientific and biomedical publishing: fourth in the series on editorship. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 139(1), 156-167.

Langston, L. (1996). Scholarly Communication and Electronic Publication: Implications for Research, Advancement, and Promotion. http://www.library.ucsb.edu/untangle/langston.html (accessed 29 November 2005).

MacCallum, C. J., & Parthasarathy, H. (2006). Open access increases citation rate. PLoS Biology, 5, 661–662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040176

Macleod, D. (2005). Royal society attacked for 'negative' open access stance. Guardian Unlimited, http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/research/story/0,9865,1661107,00.html (accessed 29 September 2006).

McCabe, M., & Snyder, C. (2004). The economics of open-access journals. www.prism.gatech.edu/~mm284/OA.pdf (accessed 2 October 2006).

McVeigh, M. E. (2004). Open Access Journals in the ISI Citation Databases: Analysis of Impact Factors and Citation Patterns. http://www.isinet.com/media/presentrep/essayspdf/openaccesscitations2.pdf (accessed 30 November 2005).

Milmo, D. (2005). Lancet publisher scathing about university funding in UK. The Guardian Feb 18, 2005 p.23.

Montonen, C. (2005). The european physics publications scene: avant-garde and traditionalism. Learned Publishing, 18, 149–151.

Morris, S. (2003). Open publishing. Learned Publishing, 16, 171-176.

Morris, S. (2004a). Open Access publishing and not-for-profit publishers. Paper presented at the Cologne Summit on Open Access Publishing, Cologne, 2004.

Morris, S. (2004b). Open access: how are publishers reacting? Serials Review, 30(4), 304-307.

Morris, S. (2005). The true costs of scholarly journal publishing. Learned Publishing, 18, 115-126.

Morris, S. (2006). Personal view: when is a journal not a journal? a closer look at the doaj. Learned Publishing, 19, 1–3.

Mort, D. (2004). STM information market still looks healthy. http://www.researchinformation.info/special2004overview.html (accessed 2 October 2006).

National Institutes of Health. (2005). Final NIH Public Access Policy Implementation. http://publicaccess.nih.gov/publicaccess_imp.htm (accessed 29 November 2005).

National Library of Medicine. (2004). Fact Sheet: What's the Difference Between MEDLINE® and PubMed®? http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/dif_med_pub.html (accessed 29 September 2006).

Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., & Rowlands, I. (2005). Open access journal publishing: the views of some of the world's senior authors. Journal of Documentation, 61, 497–519. doi: 10.1108/00220410510607499

Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., & Jamali, H. R. (2006). The impact of open access publishing on use and users: A deep log analysis of 'Nucleic Acids Research'. http://www.oxfordjournals.org/news/oa_report.pdf (accessed 29 September 2006).

Nicholas, D., & Rowlands, I. (2005). Open access publishing: the evidence from the authors. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(3), 179-181.

OCLC. (2003). Five-year information format trends. http://www.oclcpica.org/?id=1235&ln=uk (accessed 2 October 2006).

Office of Fair Trading. (2002). The market for scientific, technical and medical journals. http://www.oft.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/A56C7602-C0BD-428D-BED2-36784363243B/0/oft396.pdf (accessed 2 October 2006).

Ojala, M. (2005). Open access: open sesame or opening Pandora's box? EContent, 28(6), 30.

Open Society Institute (2001). Budapest Open Access Initiative. http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml (accessed 19 January 2006)

Patterson, V., Barbour, C., & Mccallum, M. (2004). Opening access to scholarly papers. Financial Times Jun 2, 2004 p.18.

Peek, R. (2005). Counting OA journals. Information Today, 22, 17–18.

Peek, R. (2004a). The free-access debate flourishes. Information Today, 21(5), 17.

Peek, R. (2004b). The cascading effect. Information Today, 21(8), 17.

Pentz, E. (2005). Crossref search pilot. CrossRef Newsletter. Cited in http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2005_02_13_fosblogarchive.html (accessed 3 October 2006).

Suber, P. (2003). Bethesda statement on open access publishing. http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm (accessed 27 November 2005).

Pinfield, S. (2004). Self-archiving publications. In Gorman, G. E., & Rowland, F. (Eds.), International Yearbook of Library and Information Management 2004/2005: Scholarly Publishing in an Electronic Era. (pp. 118–145) Facet Publishing. http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/archive/00000142/

Pinfield, S. (2005). A mandate to self archive? The role of open access institutional repositories. Serials: the Journal for the Serials Community, 18, 30–34.

Poynder, R. (2004). No gain without pain. Information Today, 21(10), 1–5.

Poynder, R. (2004). Ten years after. Information Today, 21 (9), 1–5.

Prosser, D. C. (2003). From here to there: a proposed mechanism for transforming journals from closed to open access. Learned Publishing, 16, 163-166.

Public Library of Science. (2004). Publishing open-access journals. http://www.plos.org/downloads/oa_whitepaper.pdf (accessed 2 October 2006).

Quint, B. (2004). Future of the NIH open access policy. Information Today, 21(9), 7.

RCUK. (2006). RCUK position statement on access to research outputs. Research Councils UK. http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/access/2006statement.pdf (accessed 4 October 2006)

Regazzi, J. (2004). The shifting sands of open access publishing, a publisher's view. Serials Review, 30(4), 275-280.

Regazzi, J., & Caliguiri, N. A. (2006). Publisher and author partnerships: a changing landscape. Learned Publishing, 19, 183–192.

Reid, C. (2004). STM publishers fight open access proposal. Publishers Weekly, 251(35), 11.

Wray, R. (2004). Business: Media Business: MPs back free access to research results. The Guardian Jul 20, 2004 p.17.

Richardson, M. (2005). Open access and institutional repositories: an evidence-based approach. Serials, 18, 98–103.

Rowland, F., Swan, A., Needham, P., Probets, S., Muir, A., Oppenheim, C., O'Brien, A., & Hardy, R. (2004). Delivery, management and access model for e-prints and open access journals. Serials Review, 30(4), 298-303.

Rowlands, I., & Nicholas, D. (2005). New journal publishing models: an international survey of senior authors. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ciber/pa_stm_final_report.pdf (accessed 14 January 2006)

Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., & Huntington, P. (2004). Scholarly communication in the digital environment: what do authors want? Learned Publishing, 17, 261-273.

Rowlands, I., & Nicholas, D. (2005). Scholarly communication in the digital environment : the 2005 survey of journal author behaviour and attitudes. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 57, 481–497.

Royal Society. (2005). Royal Society position statement on 'open access’. http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/page.asp?id=3882 (accessed 25 November 2005)

Royal Society. (2006). Royal Society launches trial of new 'open access' journal service. http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/news.asp?id=4838 (accessed 29 September 2006)

Russell, J. (2005). Opening access to uk doctoral theses: the ethos project. Serials, 18, 230.

Sainsbury, D. (2004). Open access is not only science publishing model. Financial Times Nov 10, 2004 p.16.

Schroter, S., Tite, L., & Smith, R. (2005). Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors. BMJ, 330, 756–759. doi:10.1136/bmj.38359.695220.82

Shah, S. (2005). Reed Elsevier facing fresh threat to science journal profits. The Independent Jan 6, 2005 p.44.

Shah, S. (2004). Anger as ministers block science publishing shake-up. The Independent Nov 8, 2004 p.38.

SHERPA. (2006). Distribution of UK Higher Education Repositories. http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/documents/rep_distrib.html (accessed 28 September 2006)

Siegel, V. (2004). Open-access publishing. The Lancet, 364(9428), 25-25.

Simpson, P., & Hey, J. (2006). Repositories for research: southampton’s evolving role in the knowledge cycle. Program, 40, 224–231.

SQW. (2004). Costs and business models in scientific research publishing. http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/en/images/costs_business_7955.pdf (accessed 30 November 2005)

Stern, D. (2005). Open access or differential pricing for journals: the road best traveled? Online, 29(2), 30.

Suber, P. (2003). Scholarly communication – removing barriers to research: an introduction to open access for librarians. College & Research Libraries News, 64(2), http://ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlpubs/crlnews/backissues2003/february1/removingbarriers.htm (accessed 2 October 2006)

Suber, P. (2005). Open access overview. http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm (accessed 13 November 2005)

Suber, P. (2005). Open access, impact, and demand. BMJ, 330, 1097–1098. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7500.1097

Swan, A., & Brown, S. (2004). Authors and open access publishing. Learned Publishing, 17, 219-224.

Swan, A., & Brown, S. (2004). JISC/OSI JOURNAL AUTHORS SURVEY Report. http://cogprints.org/4125/01/JISCOAreport1.pdf (accessed 20 January 2006).

Swan, A., & Brown, S. (2005). Open access self-archiving: an author study. Technical Report, Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC), UK FE and HE funding councils. http://cogprints.org/4385/

Swan, A., Needham, P., Steve, P., Muir, A., Charles, O., O'Brien, A., Hardy, R., Rowland, F., & Brown, S. (2005). Developing a model for e-prints and open access journal content in uk further and higher education. Learned Publishing, 18, 25-40.

Tenopir, C. (2004). Open access alternatives. Library Journal, 129(12), 33.

Tenopir, C., King, D., & Boyce, P. (2003). Patterns of journal use by scientists through three evolutionary phases. D-Lib Magazine, 9 (5),

Tenopir, C., & King, D.W. (2002). Reading behaviour and electronic journals. Learned Publishing, 15, 259–265.

Berners-Lee, T., Roure, D.D., Harnad, S., Shadbolt, N., Law, D., Murray-Rust, P., Oppenheim, C., & Wilks, Y. (2005). Open Letter to Research Councils UK: Rebuttal of ALPSP Critique. http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/18-guid.html (accessed 29 November 2005)

Turid, H., Tomas, G., & Bo-Christer, B. (2004). The open access scientific journal: an empirical study. Learned Publishing, 17, 199-209.

Ulrich, P. (2004). Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance. Learned Publishing, 17, 105-113.

Spedding, V. (2005). The infrastructure is there: time to populate. http://www.researchinformation.info/special2005selfarchiving.html (accessed 29 November 2005)

Velterop, J. (2003). Should scholarly societies embrace open access (or is it the kiss of death)? Learned Publishing, 16, 167-169.

Velterop, J. (2004). Open access: science publishing as science publishing should be. Serials Review, 30(4), 308-309.

Vine, R. (2006). Google scholar. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 94, 97–99. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1324783

Walport, M. (2004). The paperless revolution in knowledge. Financial Times. Apr 30, 2004. p.14.

Waltham, M. (2005). Open access – the impact of legislative developments. Learned Publishing, 18, 101–114.

Ware, M. (2004a). Universities' own electronic repositories yet to impact on open access. Nature webdebates, http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/4.html (accessed 27 September 2006)

Ware, M. (2004b). Pathfinder research on web-based repositories. http://www.palsgroup.org.uk/ (accessed 29 September 2006)

Ware, M. (2006). Open archives and their impact on journal cancellations. Learned Publishing, 19, 226–229.

Wellcome Trust. (2005). Wellcome Trust position statement in support of open and unrestricted access to published research. http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/doc_WTD002766.html (accessed 29 November 2005).

Willinsky, J. (2003). The nine flavours of open access publishing. Postgraduate Journal of Medicine, 49, 263–267.

Wray, R. (2005). Wellcome boost for open access. The Guardian Media Business, 15 December 2005 p.27.

Wray, R. (2005). Springer hires open access pioneer. The Guardian, Aug 17, 2005, p.17.

Wray, R. (2005). Media business: Open access moves a step closer. The Guardian, Feb 2, 2005, p.23.

Wray, R. (2004). Reed allows academics free web access: 200,000 articles may be available on the net but competitors accuse publisher of making token effort. The Guardian Jun 3, 2004 p.23.

Wray, R. (2004). Open access jeopardises academic publishers, Reed chief warns. The Guardian, Jun 30, 2004, p.16.

Wray, R. (2005). Keystroke strategy for open access: Southampton professor will unveil new plan that could revolutionise how academics and the public view research. The Guardian, Mar 1, 2005 p.20.

Wray, R. (2004). Analysis: Confused decision on science publishing. The Guardian Nov 9, 2004, p.16.

Wren, J.D. (2005). Open access and openly accessible: a study of scientific publications shared via the internet. BMJ, 330, 1128–1132. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38422.611736.E0

Wysocki, B.J. (2004). Academic libraries back open access publishing system. Financial Times, May 29, 2004, p.12.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS