Current status of open access in biomedical field-the comparison of countries related to the impact of national policies

Matsubayashi, Mamiko and Kurata, Keiko and Sakai, Yukiko and Morioka, Tomoko and Kato, Shinya and Mine, Shinji and Ueda, Shuichi Current status of open access in biomedical field-the comparison of countries related to the impact of national policies., 2006 . In 69th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST), Austin (US), 3-8 November 2006. [Conference paper]


Download (489kB) | Preview

English abstract

The purpose of the article is to show the current status of Open Access (OA) in biomedical field, and compare some countries such as the U.S., the U.K. and Japan in terms of the OA situation. There are controversies about the definition of OA. After examining the requirements about OA, we recognized OA as the situation in which researchers could read the full text of articles in unrestricted way. In order to investigate the current situation of OA, 4,756 articles were sampled randomly from articles published between January and September in 2005 and indexed in PubMed. The main results are as follows: 1) The rate of OA articles was 25%, and 75% of all the articles were available online including electronic subscription journal articles. 2) The means of OA was classified into five types. Among them, the rate of OA articles by “OA and Hybrid OA journals” was overwhelming (more than 70%), and that of PMC was 26.2%. The rates of OA articles by “institutional repositories” and “authors’ personal sites” were considerably low (6.0% and 4.9% respectively). 3) When comparing the rates of OA articles by countries, Belgium ranked the first with 41.7%. The five countries indicated more than 30% in OA articles: Canada and India (38.7%), Brazil (36.4%), Australia (30.8%), and the U.S. (30.7%). Each country was different in the means of OA. 4) We explored the rates of OA for two groups; one group consists of articles published in journals with IF, and the other consists of articles published in journals without IF. The rate of OA for the group of articles in journals with IF is 20.6%, and that of articles in journals without IF is 30.8%.

Item type: Conference paper
Keywords: Open Access, Institutional Repository, OA journals, Hybrid OA Journals, self-archiving, National Policies, NIH Public Access Policy, Biomedicine, health information
Subjects: H. Information sources, supports, channels.
Depositing user: Shinji MINE
Date deposited: 17 Dec 2006
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:05


Adachi, J., Negishi, M. Tutiya, S. Konishi, K., Oba, T. & Okumura, S. (2003)Publishing role in the scholarly communication : Dispatch of Japanese scientific research seen in SPARC/JAPAN and university library (in Japanese)The Journal of Information Science and Technology Association, 53(9), 429-434

Antelman, K. (2004)Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact?College and Research Libraries65(5), 372-382. Retrieved February 6, 2006 from

Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002)Retrieved January 26, 2006, from

Council for Science and Technology Policy (2005)Science and Technology Basic Plan (in Japanese) Retrieved February 2, 2006 from

Directory of Open Access JournalsRetrieved February 3, 2006 from

Hajjem, C., Harnad, S. and Gingras, Y. (2005)Ten-Year Cross-Disciplinary Comparison of the Growth of Open Access and How it Increases Research Citation Impact. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin. 28(4), 39-47. Retrieved February 2, 2006 from

Harnad, S. (2005)The Implementation of the Berlin Declaration on Open Access : Report on the Berlin 3 Meeting Held 28 February - 1 March 2005 Southampton, UK. D-Lib Magazine, 11(3). Retrieved February 2, 2006 from

Harnad, S., and Brody, T. (2004)Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA)?vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10(6). Retrieved February 2, 2006 from

House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (2004)Scientific Publications ; Free for all?Retrieved February 2, 2006 from

Kurtz, M.J., Eichihorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C., Demleitner, M., Henneken, E., Murray, S. S. (2005)The effect of use and access on citations Information Processing and Management, 41(5), 1395-1402

Lawrence, S. (2001)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact, Nature 411(6837): 521. Retrieved February 2, 2006 from

Miyairi, Y. (2005)Impact analysis on Open Access (in Japanese). Current Awareness, 284. Retrieved February 2, 2006 from

Morris, S. (2006)When is a journal not a journal? A closer look at the DOAJ. Learned Publishing, 19(1), 73-76

Registry of Open Access Repositories. Retrieved February 3, 2006 from

SPARC Open Access Newsletter, issue #94. February 2, 2006. Retrieved February 6, 2006 from

Suber, P. (2004)Open Access OverviewRetrieved January 26, 2006 from

Swan, A. and Brown, S. (2004)Open access self-archiving: An author studyJISC Technical Report. Retrieved February 6, 2006 from


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item