¿Evaluar la calidad de los recursos Web o simplemente filtrarlos?

Salvador Oliván, Jose Antonio and Angós Ullate, José María ¿Evaluar la calidad de los recursos Web o simplemente filtrarlos? Documentación de las Ciencias de la Información, 2001, n. 24, pp. 105-126. [Journal article (Print/Paginated)]

WarningThere is a more recent version of this item available.
[img]
Preview
PDF
Artículo-Evaluacion-RDCI.pdf

Download (125Kb) | Preview

English abstract

This article examines the concepts of evaluation, quality and Web resources, and analyzes the problems in carry out an objective and rigorous evaluation due to the scientifical difficulty to define and to measure the quality of the information and to the nonexistence of validated evaluation tools. The design of a retrieval information system that solely provides trustworthy resources and facilitates to the user the searching, the filtering and the evaluation of the information is proposed.

Spanish abstract

Este artículo examina los conceptos de evaluación, calidad y recursos web, y analiza los inconvenientes para llevar a cabo una evaluación objetiva y rigurosa debido a la dificultad para definir y medir la calidad de la información y a la inexistencia de instrumentos de evaluación validados científicamente. Se propone el diseño de un sistema de recuperación de información que proporcione únicamente recursos fiables y facilite al usuario la búsqueda, el filtrado y la evaluación de la información.

Item type: Journal article (Print/Paginated)
Keywords: Evaluación de la calidad; Recursos web; Sitios de revisión; Recuperación de información; Web resources; Information retrieval; Quality evaluation
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information. > BZ. None of these, but in this section.
Depositing user: Jose Antonio Salvador Oliván
Date deposited: 24 Dec 2006
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:05
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/8694

Available Versions of this Item

References

"SEEK" links will first look for possible matches inside E-LIS and query Google Scholar if no results are found.

Silberg, W. M.; Lundberg, G. D.; Musacchio, R. A. (1997). “Assessing, controlling and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: caveant lector et viewor – let the reader and viewer beware”. JAMA, vol. 277, n. 5, pp. 1244-1245.

Greer, T.; Holinga, D.; Kindel, C.; Netznik, M. (1999). Why evaluate Web information. <http://www.lrs.ed.uiuc.edu/wp/credibility/page1.htm>

Meadow, C. T.; Boyce, B. R.; Kraft, D. H. (2000). Text Information Retrieval Systems. Second edition. California: Academic Press.

Lancaster, F. W. (1996). Evaluación de la biblioteca. Madrid: ANABAD.

Abad García, Ma F. (1997). Investigación evaluativa en Documentación. Aplicación a la Documentación Médica. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia. Servicio de Publicaciones.

Salvador Oliván, J. A. (2000). “La Estadística como herramienta fundamental para el profesional de la información en el entorno empresarial y Centros de Investigación”. En: Actas de las VII Jornadas Españolas de Documentación. Bilbao: Universidad del Pais Vasco, pp. 29-38.

Sparck Jones, K.; Willet, P. (1997). Readings in information retrieval. San Francisco, California: Morgan Kaufmann.

World Wide Web Consortium. Web Characterization Terminology & Definitions Sheet. W3C Working Draft 24-May-1999. <http://www.w3.org/1999/05/WCA-terms/>

International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. (1999). ISBD(ER): International Standard Bibliographic Description for Electronic Resources. <http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/pubs/isbd2.htm>

Association for Library Collections and Technical Series (A division of the Amercian Library Association). Cataloging and Classification Section. Committee on Cataloging: Description and Access. (1999). Task Force on Harmonization of ISBD(ER) and AACR2. Final Report. pp 74. <http://www.libraries.psu.edu/iasweb/personal/jca/ccda/tf-harm3.pdf>

Roswitha, P.; Boekhorst P. (1998). Medición de la calidad: directrices internacionales para la edición del rendimiento en las bibliotecas universitarias. Versión española de Ramón Abad Hiraldo y Belén Altuna Esteibar. Madrid: ANABAD.

International Organization for Standarization, Technical Committee ISO/TC 176. (1994). ISO 8402: Quality management and quality assurance-Vocabulary. 2nd. ed. Geneva: International Organization for Standarization.

Information Market Observatory (IMO. (1995). The quality of electronic information products and services. Luxembourg, September 1995. <http://158.169.50.95:10080/imo/en/9504.html>

Hofman, P.; Worsfold, E.; Hiom, D.; Day, M.; Oehler, A. (1996). DESIRE-Development of a European service for information on research and education. <http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/DESIRE/quality/report.rtf>

Codina, L. (2000). “Evaluación de recursos digitales en línea: conceptos, indicadores y métodos”. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, vol. 23, n. 1, pp. 9-43.

Nielsen, J. (2000). Usabilidad. Diseño de sitios Web. Madrid: Pearson Educación.

Cooke, A.; McNab, A.; Anagnostellis, B. (1996). “The good, the bad and the ugly: Internet review sites”. En: D. Raitt and B. Jeapes (eds). Online Information 96: Proceedings of the 20th International Online Information Meeting, London, 3-5 December 1996. Oxford: Learned Information, pp. 33-40. <http://biome.ac.uk/sage/iolim96.html>

Wang, R. Y.; Strong, D. M. (1997). “Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers”. Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 12, n. 4, pp. 5-34.

Cambridge Research Group (1997). Information quality assessment survey: Administrator’s guide. Cambridge, MA: CRG.

Strong, D. M.; Lee, Y. W.; Wang, R. Y. (1996). “Data quality in context”. Communications of the ACM, vol. 40, nº 5, pp. 103-110.

Huang, K-T; Lee, Y. W.; Wang, R. Y. (2000). Calidad de la información y gestión del conocimiento. Madrid: AENOR.

Rolph, P.; Bartram, P. (1994). The information agenda: harnessing relevant information in a changing business environment. London: Management Books 2000.

Ciolek, T. M. (1996). “The six quests for the electronic grail: Current approaches to information quality in WWW resources”. Review Informatique et Statistique dans les Sciences Humaines, n. 1-4, pp. 45-71. <http://www.ciolek.com/PAPERS/QUEST/QuestMain.html>

Oliver, K. M.; Wilkinson, G. L.; Bennett, L. T. (1997). “Evaluating the quality of Internet information sources”. Paper Presented at The Annual Convention of the Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), ED-MEDIA/ED-TELECOM 97, Calgary, AB, Canada. <http://www.edtech.vt.edu/edtech/kmoliver/webeval/AACE97.html>

Bennett, L., Wilkinson, G., Oliver, K. (1996). “The development and validation of instruments to assess the quality of Internet information: A progress report”. Paper Presented at The Annual Convention of the Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), ED-MEDIA 96, Boston Massachusetts. <http://www.edtech.vt.edu/edtech/kmoliver/webeval/AACE96paper.html>

BIOME Special Advisory Group on Evaluation. (2001). Factors affecting the quality of an information source. <http://biome.ac.uk/guidelines/eval/factors.html>

Centrale Santé. Net Scoring: critères de qualité de l’information de santé sur l’Internet. 12 April 2001 (version 3). <http://www.chu-rouen.fr/netscoring>

CISMeF. Catalogue et Index des Sites Médicaux Francophones. <http://www.chu-rouen.fr/cismef/>

Anagnostellis, B.; Cooke, A.; McNab, A. (1997). “Thinking critically about information on the Web”. Vine, vol. 104, pp. 21-28. <http://biome.ac.uk/sage/vine.html>

Anagnostellis, B.; Cox, J. (1996). “Data on the Internet: evaluating the quality or less is more”. En: C. J. Armstrong and R. J. Hartley (eds). ukolug96@warwick.ac.uk: UKOLUG State-of-the-Art Conference Warwick 17-19 July 1996, London: UKOLUG. pp.59-69. <http://biome.ac.uk/sage/ukolug.html>

McNab, A.; Anagnostelis, B. (1997). “Never mind the quality, check the badge-width!”. Ariadne vol. 9, pp.5-6. <http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue9/quality-ratings/>

Impicciatore, P.; Pandolfini, C.; Casella, N.; Bonati, M. (1997). “Reliability of health information for the public on the world wide web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home”. BMJ, vol. 314, pp. 1875-1879.

Ciolek, T.M. (1999). Information quality – some definitions. <http://www.ciolek.com/WWWVLPages/QltyPages/QltyDefinitions.html>

Eysenbach, G.; Diepgen, T. L. (1998). “Towards quality management of medical information on the internet: evaluation, labelling, and filtering of information”. BMJ vol. 317, pp. 1496-1500. <http://www.bmj.com>

Jadad, A. R.; Gagliardi, A.G. (1998). “Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel?”. JAMA, vol. 279, pp. 611-614.

Horvat, J.; Sarlija, N. (2000). “How to develop an algorithm in order to choose the appropiate measurement instrument”. Developments in Survey Methodology, pp. 109-123. <http://mrvar.fdv.uni-lj.si/pub/mz/mz15/horvat.pdf>

Zhang, X.; Keeling, K.B.; Pavur, R.J. (2000). “Information quality of commercial Web site home pages: an explorative analysis”. Fundamental Concepts for the New Millennium. Twenty-First Annual International Conference on Information Systems. Brisbane, Australia, 10-13 December 2000. <http://www.commerce.uq.edu.au/icis/ProgramFinal.pdf>

Auer, N. J. (2001). Bibliography on evaluating Internet resources. <http://borneo.lib.vt.edu/research/libinst/evalbiblio.html>

Wyatt, J. C. (1997). “Measuring quality and impact on the World Wide Web”. BMJ, vol. 314, pp. 1879-1881.

Internet Healthcare Coalition (2000). EHealth Code of Ethics. <http://www.ihealthcoalition.org/ethics/code0254.pdf>

Health On the Net Foundation (1997). HON Code of Conduct (HONcode) for medical and health Web sites. Version 1.6, April 1997. <http://www.hon.ch/HONcode/Conduct.html>

Ingwersen, P. (1998). “The calculation of Web Impact Factors”. Journal of Documentation, vol. 54, n. 2, pp. 236-243.

Aguillo, I. F. (2000). “Indicadores hacia una evaluación objetiva (cuantitativa) de sedes web”. En: Actas de las VII Jornadas Españolas de Documentación. Bilbao: Universidad del Pais Vasco, pp.233-248.

Sanvick, H. (1999). “Health information and interaction on the internet: a survey of female urinary incontinence”. BMJ, vol. 319, nº 7201, pp. 29-32.

Pandolfini, C.; Impicciatore, P.; Bonati, M. (2000). “Parents on the web: risks for quality management of cough in children”. Pediatrics, vol. 105, n. 1, pp. 1-8.


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item