La investigación en recuperación de información: revisión de tendencias actuales y críticas

Salvador Oliván, José Antonio and Arquero Avilés, Rosario La investigación en recuperación de información: revisión de tendencias actuales y críticas. Cuadernos de Documentación Multimedia, 2004, vol. 15. [Journal article (Unpaginated)]

[img]
Preview
PDF
InvestigaciónRI.pdf

Download (101kB) | Preview

English abstract

Two paradigms have guided the research in information retrieval: one focused in algorithms design and information retrieval systems, and other focused in all the factors that have an effect on the user's information search process. This article revises characteristics and current trends in research in both paradigms, analyzing criticisms than these paradigms have received related to the different methodology and difficulty to define relevance and to measure changes derived from mental state of user.

Spanish abstract

La investigación en recuperación de información ha estado dominada por dos paradigmas, uno centrado en el diseño de algoritmos y sistemas de recuperación de información, y otro centrado en todo lo que rodea al usuario en la búsqueda de información. En este artículo se revisan brevemente las características y tendencias actuales de investigación en ambos paradigmas, así como las críticas que han recibido, derivadas de la diferente metodología y de la dificultad para definir la relevancia y medir los cambios que se producen en el estado mental del usuario.

Item type: Journal article (Unpaginated)
Keywords: Recuperación de información; Relevancia; Evaluación; Information retrieval; Relevance; Evaluation.
Subjects: L. Information technology and library technology > LZ. None of these, but in this section.
Depositing user: Jose Antonio Salvador Oliván
Date deposited: 05 Jan 2007
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:05
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/8759

References

"SEEK" links will first look for possible matches inside E-LIS and query Google Scholar if no results are found.

ORERA ORERA, L. “Reflexiones en torno a la investigación en Biblioteconomía”. En: TRAMULLAS SAZ, J. (Editor). Tendencias de Investigación en Documentación. Zaragoza: Biblioteconomía y Documentación, Universidad de Zaragoza, 1996, p. 19-49.

ROBERTSON, S. E. “Computer retrieval”. En: Vickery, B.C. (Ed). Fifty Years of Information Progress. A Journal of Documentation Review. London: Aslib, The Association for Information Management, 1994, p. 119-146.

OLE PORS, N. “Information retrieval, experimental models and statistical analysis”. Journal of Documentation, 2000, vol. 56, n. 1, p. 55-70.

TAGUE-SUTCLIFFE, J. “The pragmatics of information retrieval experimentation, revisited”. Information Processing and Management, 1992, vol. 28, n. 4, p. 467-490.

FROEHLICH, T. J. “Relevance reconsidered-Towards and agenda for the 21st Century: Introduction to special topic issue on relevance research”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1994, vol. 45, nº 3, p. 124-133.

MIZZARO, S. “Relevance: The whole history”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1997, vol. 48, n. 9, p. 810-832.

SCHAMBER, L. “Relevance and information behavior”. En: M.E. Williams (Ed.). Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. Meford, NJ: American Society for Information Science, 1994, vol. 29, p. 3-48.

HARTER, S. P. “Variations in relevance assessments and the measurement of retrieval effectiveness”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1996, vol. 47, n. 1, p. 37-49.

GREISDORF, H. “Relevance: An interdisciplinary and information science perspective”. Informing Science (Special Issue on Information Science Research), 2000, vol. 3, n. 2, p. 67-72.

REES, A.M.; SARACEVIC, T. “The measurability of relevance”. Proceedings of the American Documentation Institute. Annual Meeting, Santa Monica, California, October 3-7, 1966. Woodland Hills, California: Adrianne Press, 1966, vol. 3, p. 225-234.

ELLIS, D. “The dilemma of measurement in information retrieval research”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1996, vol. 47, n. 1, p. 23-36.

HARTER, S. P. “Variations in relevance assessments and the measurement of retrieval effectiveness”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1996, vol. 47, n. 1, p. 37-49.

PERSSON, O. “The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986-1990”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1994, vol. 15, n. 1, p. 31-38.

WHITE, H. D.; McCAIN, K. W. “Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1998, vol. 49, n. 4, p. 327-355.

ELLIS, D. Progress and Problems in Information Retrieval. London: Library Association Publishing, 1996.

ROBERTSON, S. E.; BEAULIEU, M. M. “On the evaluation of IR systems”. Information Processing and Management, 1992, vol. 28, n. 4, p. 457-466.

NIST. TRECK Tracks, 2005 <http://trec.nist.gov/tracks.html>. [Consulta: 21 de febrero de 2005].

ACM. The 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR. Conference on Research and Devlopment in Information Retrieval, 2004.

<http://www.dcc.ufmg.br/eventos/sigir2005/callforpapers.php>. [Consulta: 21 de febrero de 2005].

American Society for Information Science and Technology. ASIS&T Special Interests Groups (SIGs), 2005. <http://www.asist.org/> [Consulta: 21 de febrero de 2005].

HARTER, S.; HERT, C. “Evaluation of information retrieval systems: Approaches, issues and methods”. En: M. Williams (Ed). Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 1997, vol. 32, p. 3-94.

BLAIR, D. C. “Some thougths on the reported results of TREC”. Information Processing and Management, 2002, vol. 38, n. 3, p. 445-451.

SARACEVIC, T.; VOORHEES, E.; HARMAN, D. “Letter to the Editor. Information Processing and Management, 2003, vol. 39, n. 1, p. 153-156.

SPARCK JONES, K. “Letter to the Editor. Information Processing and Management, 2003, vol. 39, n. 1, p. 156-159.

De MEY, M. “The relevance of the cognitive paradigm for information science”. En: Harbo, O., Kajberg, L. (Eds). Theory and Application of Information Research. Proceedings of the 2nd International Research Forum on Information Science. London: Mansell, 1980, p. 49-61.

SARACEVIC, T. Information Science revisited. Rutgers, N.Y.: Rutgers University, School of Communication, Information and Library Studies, 1990.

BELKIN, N. J.; ODDY, R. N.; BROOKS, H. M. “ASK for information retrieval. Part I. Background and theory”. Journal of Documentation, 1982, vol. 38, n. 2, p. 61-71.

BORLUND, P. “Experimental components for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems”. Journal of Documentation, 2000, vol. 56, n. 1, p. 71-90.

OLUIC-VUKOVIC, V. “From information to knowledge: Some reflections on the origin of the current shifting towards knowledge processing and further perspective”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2001, vol. 52, n. 1, p. 54-61.

TAGUE-SUTCLIFFE, J. “Some perspectives on the evaluation of information retrieval systems”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1996, vol. 47, n. 1, p. 1-3.

SARACEVIC, T. “Information Science”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1999, vol. 50, n. 12, p. 1051-1063.

WU, M.; SONNENWALD, D. H. “Reflections on information retrieval evaluation”. Proceedings of the 1999 EBTI, ECAI, SEER & PNC Joint Meeting. Academia Sinica, Taipei, 1999, p. 63-81. < http://pnclink.org/annual/annual1999/1999pdf/wu-mm.pdf>. [Consulta: 21 de febrero de 2005].

ROGERS, E. Diffusion of Innovations, 4th Edition. New York: The Free Press, 1995. <http://nnlm.gov/pnr/eval/rogers.html>. [Consulta: 21 de febrero de 2005].

BEAULIEU, M. “Interaction in information searching and retrieval”. Journal of Documentation, 2000, vol. 56, n. 4, p. 431-439.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item