Are virtual reference services color blind?

Abels, E. G. (1996). The e-mail reference interview. Reference Quarterly, 35(3), 345−358.

Adkins, D., & Espinal, I. (2004). The diversity mandate. Library Journal, 129(7), 52−54.

Allen, R., Dawson, G., Wheatley, K., & White, C. S. (2004). Diversity practices: Learning responses for modern organizations. Development and Learning in Organizations, 18(6), 13−15.

American Library Association (1995). Code of ethics of the American Library Association. Retrieved February 20, 2005, from http://www.ala.org/ala/oif/statementspols/codeofethics/codeethics.htm

Bushallow-Wilbur, L., DeVinney, G., & Whitcomb, F. (1996). Electronic mail reference service: A study. Reference Quarterly, 35(3), 359−371.

Bushman, B. J., & Bonacci, A. M. (2004). You've got mail: Using e-mail to examine the effect of prejudiced attitudes on discrimination against Arabs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(6), 753−759.

Carter, D. S., & Janes, J. (2003). Unobtrusive data analysis of digital reference questions and service at the Internet Public Library: An exploratory study. Library Trends, 49(2), 251−265.

Civil Rights Act of 1964 § 201, 42 USC, § 2000(a) (1964).

Coffman, S. (2003). Going live: Starting and running a virtual reference service. Chicago: American Library Association.

Coffman, S., & Arret, L. (2004). To chat or not to chat: Taking yet another look at virtual reference. The Searcher, 12(8), 49−56.

Curry, D. A. (1994). Your worries ain't like mine: African American librarians and the pervasiveness of racism, prejudice and discrimination in academe. Reference Librarian, 45/46, 299−311.

Curry, A., & Copeman, D. (2005). Reference service to international students: A field stimulation research study. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(5), 409−420.

Dewdney, P., & Ross, C. S. (1994). Flying a light aircraft: Reference service evaluation from a user's viewpoint. Reference Quarterly, 34(2), 217−230.

Douglas, K. M., & McGarty, C. (2001). Identifiability and self-presentation: Computer-mediated, communication and intergroup interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(3), 399−416.

Durrance, J. (1989). Reference success: Does the 55 percent rule tell the whole story? Library Journal, 114, 31−36.

Feagin, J. (1991). The continuing significance of race: Antiblack discrimination in public places. American Sociological Review, 56(1), 101−116.

Glaser, J., & Kahn, K. B. (2005). Prejudice and discrimination and the Internet. In Y. Amichai-Hamburger (Ed.), The social psychology of the Internet (pp. 247−274). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Gross, M., & Saxton, M. L. (2002). Integrating the imposed query into the evaluation of reference service: A dichotomous analysis of user ratings. Library & Information Science Research, 24, 251−263.

Hernon, P., & Calvert, P. (2005). E-service quality in libraries: Exploring its features and dimensions. Library & Information Science Research, 27, 377−404.

Hernon, P., & McClure, C. R. (1986). Unobtrusive reference testing: The 55 percent rule. Library Journal, 111(7), 37−41.

International Federation of Library Associations (2005). IFLA digital reference guidelines. Retrieved January 5, 2006, from http://www.ifla.org/VII/s36/pubs/drg03.htm

Kaske, N., & Arnold, J. (2002). An unobtrusive evaluation of online real time library reference services. Retrieved February 20, 2005, from http://www.lib.umd.edu/groups/digref/kaskearnoldunobtrusive.html

Liu, M., & Redfern, B. (1997). Information seeking behavior of multicultural students: A case study at San Jose State University. College and Research Libraries, 58, 348−354.

McClure, C., Lankes, R. David, Gross, M., & Choltco-Devlin, B. (2002). Statistics, measures and quality standards for assessing digital library services: Guidelines and procedures. ERIC Clearinghouse. Retrieved December 22, 2005, from http://quartz.syr.edu/rdlankes/tiki-download_file.php?fileId=7

Reference and User Services Association (2004a). Guidelines for behavioral performance of reference and information service providers. Retrieved January 5, 2006, from http://www.ala.org/ala/rusa/rusaprotools/referenceguide/guidelinesbehavioral.htm

Reference and User Services Association (2004b). Guidelines for implementing and maintaining virtual reference services. Retrieved September 20, 2005, from http://www.ala.org/ala/rusa/rusaprotools/referenceguide/virtrefguidelines.htm

Shachaf, P. (2005). Bridging cultural diversity through email. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 8(2), 46−60.

Shachaf, P., Hara, N., Meho, L., Kwon, N., Li, B., Sakai, Y., & Lankes, D. (2005). Cross-cultural analysis of virtual reference. [electronic version]. Proceedings of the 68th Annual Meeting of the Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 42.

Sproull, L., & Keisler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 1492−1513.

Stacy-Bates, K. (2003). E-mail reference responses from academic ARL libraries: An unobtrusive study. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 43(1), 59−70.

Swanson, D. R. (2002). Diversity programs: Attitude and realities in the contemporary corporate environment. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 7(4), 257−268.

White, M. D. (2001). Digital reference services: Framework for analysis and evaluation. Library & Information Science Research, 23, 211−231.

Whitlatch, J. B. (1989). Unobtrusive studies and the quality of academic reference services. College and Research Libraries, 50(2), 181−194.

Whitlatch, J. B. (2001). Evaluating reference services in the electronic age. Library Trends, 50(2), 207−217.

Whitmire, E. (1999). Racial differences in the academic library experiences of undergraduates. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 25(1), 33−37.

Whitmire, E. (2003). Cultural diversity and undergraduates' academic library experiences. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 29(3), 148−161.

Zoe, L. R., & DiMartino, D. (2000). Cultural diversity and end-user searching—An analysis by gender and language background. Research Strategies, 17(4), 291−305.