Scholarly Electronic Journal Publishing: A Study Comparing Commercial and Nonprofit/University Publishers

Galyani Moghaddam, Golnessa Scholarly Electronic Journal Publishing: A Study Comparing Commercial and Nonprofit/University Publishers. Serials Librarian, 2007, vol. 51, n. 3/4, pp. 165-183. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of Scholarly_Journals_Publishing.pdf]
Preview
PDF
Scholarly_Journals_Publishing.pdf

Download (225kB) | Preview

English abstract

Pricing is a critical aspect of economic and business models of scholarly electronic journals. This study, in accordance with conventional wisdom, has divided publishers into two broad groups—those in the for-profit sector (hereafter called commercial publishers) and those in the nonprofit sector (hereafter called nonprofit/university publishers)—and examines the differences between the two groups in terms of journal price. It focuses on ten publishers, five in each group, and 4,415 electronic journals published by them. The Average Subscription Price (ASP) and the Average Subscription Price per Issue (ASPPI) of the various publishers and disciplines in 2003 were calculated. A comparison of the two publisher groups revealed that the number of journals published by the commercial publishers was higher than the journals published by the nonprofit/university publishers. Blackwell was found to be the least expensive (US $455) among the five commercial publishers and Cambridge University Press had the lowest ASP (US $279) among the five nonprofit/university publishers. MCB University Press was the most expensive publisher. Ranked ASP and ASPPI showed that, with the exclusion of MCB University Press, there was a remarkable difference between the commercial and nonprofit/university publishers studied. The Average Subscription Price of journals from the commercial publishers was 2.8 times higher than the ASP of journals from the nonprofit/university publishers, and the Average Subscription Price per Issue of commercial-owned journals was 1.8 times higher. These results confirm the findings of earlier studies in this regard. Physics and chemistry titles were the most costly disciplines in comparison with the other subject categories surveyed.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Journal prices, Electronic journals, Scholarly journals, Commercial publishers, Non-profit publishers
Subjects: E. Publishing and legal issues. > EB. Printing, electronic publishing, broadcasting.
J. Technical services in libraries, archives, museum. > JB. Serials management.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HN. e-journals.
Depositing user: Golnessa Galyani Moghaddam
Date deposited: 25 Mar 2007
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:07
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/9214

References

Bonn, Maria S., Wendy P. Lougee, Jeffrey K. MacKie-Mason, and Juan F. Riveros, “A Report on the PEAK Experiment: Context and Design”, D-Lib Magazine, 5(6) June 1999. (Accessed January 2006), Available at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june99/06bonn.html

Odlyzko, Andrew, “The Economics of Electronic Journals.” A paper presented at session 3 (Economics of Electronic Publishing: Journals Pricing and User Acceptance) of the Scholarly Communication and Technology Conference, organized by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation at Emory University, Atlanta, April 24-25, 1997. (Accessed January 2006), Available at: http://www.arl.org/scomm/scat/odlyzko.html

Bergstrom, Theodore C., “Free Labor for Costly Journals?” Revised March 15, 2001. (Accessed January 2006), Available at: http://www.econ.ucsb.edu/~tedb/Journals/jeppdf.pdf

Tenopir, Carol and Donald W. King, “Setting the Record Straight on Journal Publishing, Myth vs. Reality” Library Journal, 121 (5), (1996): 32-34.

Odlyzko, Andrew, “Tragic Loss or Good Riddance? The Impending Demise of Traditional Scholarly Journals”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 42, 1995. (Accessed January 2006), Available at: http://www.research.att.com/~amo

Tenopir, Carol, and Donald W. King, Towards Electronic Journals: Realities for Scientists, Librarians, and Publishers. Washington, D.C.: Special Libraries Association, 2000.

Barschall, Henry H., “The Cost of Physics Journals,” Physics Today. Vol. 39, No. 12 (December 1986): 34-36.

Barschall, Henry H., “The Cost-Effectiveness of Physics Journals,” Physics Today, Vol. 41, No. 7 (July 1988): 56-59.

Loughner, William, “Top Ten Science Publishers Take 76 Percent of Science Budget” Newsletter on Serials Pricing Issues, No. 221, (May 20, 1999).

Wilder, Stanley J., “Comparing Value and Estimated Revenue of SciTech Journals,” ARL, October 1998. (Access January 2006), Available at: http://www.arl.org/newsltr/200/wilder.html

Bergstrom, Carl T. and Theodore C. Bergstrom, “The Costs and Benefits of Library Site Licenses to Academic Journals,” PNAS, Vol. 101, No. 3, (January 20, 2004): 897-902.

“Sales and Earnings Improve at Reed Elsevier,” Publishers Weekly, Vol. 250, No. 9 (March 3, 2003): 28.

Edwards, Richard and David Shulenburger, “The High Cost of Scholarly Journals (And What to Do About It)” Change, Vol. 35, No. 6, (November/December 2003): 10.

Kean, Gene, “18th Annual Study of Journal Prices for Scientific and Medical Society Journals: 2005 Pricing Trends for U.S. Society Journals and Ten Recommendations for Pricing 2006 Volumes” JP, The Newsletter for Journal Publishers” year 2005, No. 3. (Accessed January 2006), Available at: http://www.allenpress.com/static/newsletters/pdf/JP-2005-03.pdf

“U.S. Periodicals Price Index,” (Accessed January 2006), Available at: http://www.ala.org/ala/alcts/alctspubs/pubsresources/resources.htm

Cornell University Faculty Task Force, “Journal Price Study: Core Agricultural and Biological Journals”. (November, 1998). (Accessed January 2006), Available at: http://jan.mannlib.cornell.edu/jps/jps.htm


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item