Building Bridges with Blocks: Assisting digital library and Virtual Learning Environment integration through reusable middleware

Chumbe, Santiago and MacLeod, Roddy and Kennedy, Marion L Building Bridges with Blocks: Assisting digital library and Virtual Learning Environment integration through reusable middleware., 2007 . In ELPUB 2007 International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Vienna (Austria), 13-15 June 2007. (Unpublished) [Conference paper]

[img]
Preview
PDF
chumbeEtalPaper.pdf

Download (147kB) | Preview

English abstract

Various studies have reported that achieving effective use of increasingly heterogeneous scholarly objects within institutional learning and teaching frameworks is becoming critical to the performance of educational institutions. The integration of digital information environments, such as a University library, within a virtual learning environment (VLE) encapsulates this challenge. This paper presents reusable middleware to achieve effective digital library (DL) and VLE integration. The aim of the study is to demonstrate that the use of open standards and service-oriented architectures (SOA) to build “light” web-services-based middleware is a suitable alternative for embedding digital library information sources in learning and teaching frameworks. We argue that by using open-source and open-standards approaches rather than software and practices developed specifically for a particular VLE product, it is possible to obtain open reusable middleware that can simplify the DL-VLE integration and bridge the functionality of both environments. We hope that our methodology can provide a common foundation on which a variety of institutions may build their own customized middleware to integrate scholarly objects in VLEs. The study has assessed the impact of the VLE-library integration on academic users of both the library and the VLE. Performance issues of the proposed digital library-VLE integration are also discussed. A secondary but important finding of our study is that much more effort is required to open and standardize the closed, restricted and proprietary approach of digital publishers to the reuse of scholarly material. This approach can be a serious obstacle to effective digital library-VLE integration and can limit the publishers’ ability to allow the discovery, integration and reuse of scholarly material. Current research in this area is analyzed and discussed.

Item type: Conference paper
Keywords: reusable middleware; SOA; SRU/SRW; federated search; VLE; open standards.
Subjects: J. Technical services in libraries, archives, museum. > JZ. None of these, but in this section.
L. Information technology and library technology > LS. Search engines.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HS. Repositories.
Depositing user: Roderick A MacLeod
Date deposited: 21 Jun 2007
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:07
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/9386

References

[1] M. J. Rosenberg. e-Learning - Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age. McGraw-Hill, 2001

[2] Pinfield, S. The changing role of subject librarians in academic libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 33(1) pp. 32-38. 2001

[3] Alexander W. Adaptive developments for learning in the hybrid library. Ariadne Issue 24. 2000 [Available at http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue24/sellic/intro.html]

[4] Maccoll J. Virtuous learning environments: the library and the VLE. Program: electronic library & information systems, Volume 35, Number 3, pp. 227-239(13) 2001

[5] McLea N., Lynch C. Interoperability between Library Information Services and Learning Environments - Bridging the Gaps. A white paper on behalf of the IMS Global Learning Consortium [Available at http://www.imsglobal.org/digitalrepositories/CNIandIMS_2004.pdf]

[6] Carlson S. The Deserted Library: As Students Work Online, Reading Rooms Empty Out Leading Some Campuses to Add Starbucks. Chronicle of Higher Education Nov 16 2001 [Available at http://chronicle.com/free/v48/i12/12a03501.htm]

[7] Faulhaber, C. Distance Learning and Digital Libraries: Two Sides of a Single Coin. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v47 n11 pp. 854-56 Nov 1996

[8] Low B., MacColl J. Searching Heterogeneous e-Learning Resources. Paper presented at the DELOS Workshop 2005, Digital Repositories: Interoperability and Common Services, May 2005

[9] Black, Nancy E. Distance Library Services in Canada: Observations and Overview of Some of the Issues. New Review of Libraries and Lifelong Learning 4, pp. 45-62. 2003

[10] Flecker D. and McLean N., Digital Library Content and Course Management Systems: Issues of Interoperation. Report of a study group funded by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. July 2004 [Available at http://www.diglib.org/pubs/dlf100/cmsdl0407.pdf]

[11] Whiting J., Kartus E. and Runner E. Challenges of Integrating Learning Resources within the Learning Management System at Deakin University. Proceedings of the EDUCAUSE Australasia Conference, pp. 159-171. 2003.[Available at http://www.caudit.edu.au/educauseaustralasia/2003/EDUCAUSE/PDF/AUTHOR/ED030070.PDF]

[12] Pilot Engineering Repositories Xsearch (PerX) Project: http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/perx

[13] Blackboard VLE: http://www.blackboard.com/us/index.Bb

[14] He H. What Is Service-Oriented Architecture. Sept. 2003 [Available at http://www.xml.com/pub/a/ws/2003/09/30/soa.html]

[15] Open Archives Initiative: http://www.openarchives.org

[16] SRU/SRW Protocol: http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru

[17] Z39.50 Protocol: http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency

[18] Chumbe S., MacLeod R., Barker P., Moffat M. and Rist R. Overcoming the obstacles of harvesting and searching digital repositories from federated searching toolkits, and embedding them in VLEs. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, Greece. 2006

[19] Alonso G., Casati F., Kuno H. and Machiraju V. Web Services: Concepts, Architectures and Applications. ISBN: 978-3-540-44008-6 Springer 2004

[20] Oldenettel f., Malachinski M., Reil D., Integrating digital libraries into learning environments: the LEBONED approach. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries. 2003

[21] zur Muehlen M., Nickerson, J,; Swenson, K. Developing Web Services Choreography Standards – The Case of REST vs. SOAP. Decision Support Systems 37. Elsevier. 2004.

[22] Fielding R. Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-based Software Architectures. Doctoral Dissertation. University of California, Irvine, CA (180p.) 2000

[23] Blackboard Building Blocks. Developer Guide. Blackboard Learning System Release 7.1 2006

[24] JSR 154: JavaTM Servlet 2.4 Specification: http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=154

[25] Apache Tomcat Servlet: http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/index.html

[26] Polgar J., Bram R., Polgar A. Building and Managing Enterprise-wide Portals. Idea Group Inc (IGI) 2006

[27] Lagoze, C., Krafft, D., Cornwell, T., Dushay, N., Eckstrom, D., Saylor J. Supporting education: Metadata aggregation and "automated digital libraries": a retrospective on the NSDL experience. Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries JCDL '06, June 2006

[28] Stern R. and McElroy M. Virtual Collections: Challenges in Harvesting and Transforming Metadata from Harvard Catalogs for Topical Collections. Proceedings of the DLF Fall 2006 Forum. Harvard University. Boston MA. 2006

[29] Foulonneau M. at al. Strand : Open Archives Protocol for Metadata Harvesting. The Knowledge Exchange workshop on Institutional Repositories Report. Danish Library Agency in Copenhagen, Denmark. Feb. 2007 [Available at http://knowledge-exchange.net.dynamicweb.dk]

[30] JAFER Toolkit Project: http://www.jafer.org

[31] OLIVE Project Final Report (2004) [Available at http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/OLIVE_Project_Report.pdf]

[32] Richardson J. Building Bridges between Learning Management Systems and Library Content Systems. Presented at the 11th Australian World Wide Web (AusWeb05) Conference, Gold Coast. 2005 [Available at http://ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw05/papers/refereed/richardson/index.html]

[33] S. Wilson, K. Blinco, D. Rehak. Service-Oriented Frameworks: Modelling the Infrastructure for the Next Generation of e-Learning Systems. Presented at Alt-I-Lab Conference, 2004

[34] Powell, A. A ‘service oriented’ view of the JISC Information Environment. UKOLN Report. Nov. 2005 [Available at http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/distributed-systems/jisc-ie/arch/soa/jisc-ie-soa.pdf]

[35] Payette S. Choosing Technology that can Evolve With User Needs. A service-oriented approach to e-research, e-scholarship, and advanced scholarly publication. VALA 2006 Conference. Melbourne, Australia. February 2006 [Available at http://www.valaconf.org.au/vala2006/papers2006/97_Payette_Final.pdf]

[36] Hunter J. Scientific Models – A user-oriented approach to integrating scientific data and digital libraries. VALA 2006, Melbourne. February 2006 [Available at http://www.valaconf.org.au/vala2006/papers2006/55_Hunter_Final.pdf]

[37] Johnston L. Development and Assessment of a Public Discovery and Delivery Interface for a Fedora Repository. In D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 11, Number 10. 2005 [Available at http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october05/johnston/10johnston.html]

[38] Lagoze C, Kraffti D., Payettei S. and Jesurogaii S. What Is a Digital Library Anymore, Anyway? Beyond Search and Access in the NSDL. In D-Lib Magazine Vol. 11, Number 11. 2005 [Available at http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november05/lagoze/11lagoze.html]

[39] The JISC e-Framework for Education and Research: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/programme_eframework.aspx

[40] Moffat M. 'Marketing' with Metadata - How Metadata Can Increase Exposure and Visibility of Online Content. PerX Project Report. 2006 [Available at http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/perx/advocacy/exposingmetadata.htm]

[41] Brantley P., Greenbaum D. and Yee R. Emerging Best Practices for Integrating Library Content and Services with Educational Technology. Presented at EDUCAUSE Annual Conferences. 2003

[42] Coleman R. Publication, Business and the Digital Library. Sydney University Press. 2006 [Available at http://www.valaconf.org.au/vala2006/papers2006/58_Coleman_Final.pdf]

[43] CrossRef: http://www.crossref.org

[44] Google Scholar: http://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/about.html

[45] Directory of open access journals: http://www.doaj.org

[46] Scirus: http://www.scirus.com

[47] Xie H.I. Supporting ease-of-use and user control: desired features and structure of web-based online IR systems. Information Processing and Management, Vol. 39, pp.899–922. 2003

[48] Vilar P. and Zumer M. Comparison and evaluation of the user interfaces of e-journals. Journal of Documentation. Vol. 61, No. 2, pp.203–227. 2005

[49] Jacso P. Google scholar: the pros and the cons. Online Information Review, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp.208–214. 2005

[50] Markland, M. Embedding online information resources in Virtual Learning Environments: some implications for lecturers and librarians of the move towards delivering teaching in the online environment Information Research, 8(4), paper no. 158. 2003. [Available at: http://informationr.net/ir/8-4/paper158.html]

[51] Coyle K. Open Source, open standards. Information Technology and Libraries. Vol. 21, No. 1 pp. 33-36. 2002

[52] CORBA: http://www.corba.org

[53] Lippincott J. Net Generation Students and Libraries. Chapter 13 in Educating the Net Generation. Diana G. Oblinger and James Oblinger Eds. E-Book. 2005 [Available at http://www.educause.edu/NetGenerationStudentsandLibraries/6067]

[54] Bertoncini M., Masci M. and Ronca A. Paving the Way for the Next Generation Cultural Digital Library Services: The Case Study of 'Fortuna visiva of Pompeii' within the BRICKS Project. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Electronic Publishing ELPUB2006. Bulgaria, June 2006 ISBN 978-954-16-0040-5, 2006, pp. 5-16 [Available at http://elpub.scix.net/cgi-bin/works/Show?245_elpub2006]


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item