An evalution of the use subject based information gateways: case Study ADAM

Monopoli, Maria and Nicholas, David An evalution of the use subject based information gateways: case Study ADAM., 2000 . In 9ο Πανελλήνιο Συνέδριο Ακαδημαϊκών Βιβλιοθηκών, Αθήνα (GR), 2000. [Conference paper]

[img]
Preview
 PDF
9psab020.pdf
Download (258kB) | Preview

English abstract

Nowadays, end-users have quick and direct access to a massive amount of information available on the net. However, this information is unorganised expecting users to be able to identify and evaluate it in accordance with their information needs. Subject Based Information Gateways (SBIGs), organised collections of networked information, provide users with a catalogue of authoritative Internet resources, which can be searched or/and browsed. This paper provides an evaluation of one such gateway - the Art, Design, Architecture & Media Gateway (ADAM). It provides information on who these digital users are, how often they use the service, what their reasons for use are, which search methods and services provided they prefer, and what are the advantages and/or disadvantages of an online information service.

Item type: Conference paper
Keywords: Online Information Retrieval, Evaluation, User Studies, Art Design, Architecture and Media Information Gateway, Internet Gateways, Resource Discovery Network, ADAM-UK
Subjects: C. Users, literacy and reading. > CB. User studies.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HQ. Web pages.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HR. Portals.
L. Information technology and library technology > LZ. None of these, but in this section.
Depositing user: Andreas K. Andreou
Date deposited: 29 Jun 2007
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:08
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/9750

References

(1) Desire Project: Subject Gateways Overview. Available at: http://www.desire.org/html/ subjectgateways/about.html (visited 23 March 2000).

(2) Art, Design, Architecture & Media Information Gateway (ADAM). Available at: http://www.adam.ac.uk (visited 17 July 2000).

(3) ADAM Collections Policy: Collections Policy for the Art, Design, Architecture & Media Information Gateway 2.2. Available at: http://www.adam.ac.uk/adam/reports/ collection/(visited 30 June 2000).

(4) Guidelines for the Selection of Resources for Inclusion in the ADAM Gateway. Available at: http://www.adam.ac.uk/adam/reports/select/ (visited 30 June 2000).

(5) House, N.A. et "al. User-Centred Iterative Design for Digital Libraries: the cypress experience. D-Lib Magazine, February 1996. Available at: http://www.dlib.org/ dlib/february96/02vanhouse.html (visited 05 October 1999).

(6) Bawden, D. User-oriented evaluation of information systems and services. Aldershot: Gower, 1990, p. 40.

(7) ΡΙΝΑΚΕΣ: A Subject Launchpad. Available at: http://www.hw.ac.uk/libWWW/irn/pinakes/pinakes2.html (visited 01 July 1999).

(8) King, I. and Moffat, M. Evaluation of the EEVL Pilot Service. Heriot - Watt University, 1996. Available at: http://www.eevl.ac.uk/evaluation/report.html(visited 01 May 1999).

(9) Monopoli, M. and Nicholas, D. A User-Centred Approach to the Evaluation of Subject Based Information Gateways: case study SOSIG. Aslib Proceedings, 52(6), 2000, p.224.

(10) King, I. and Moffat, M. Evaluation of the EEVL Pilot Service. Heriot-Watt University, 1996. Available at: http://www.eevl.ac.uk/evaluation/report.html(visited 01 May 1999).

(11) Ferry, A. 1996 Survey of User Information Needs and Search Methods Results. Available at: http://www.adam.ac.uk/adam/reports/survey/ (visited 30 May 1999).

(12) Monopoli, M. and Nicholas, D. A User-Centred Approach to the Evaluation of Subject Based Information Gateways: case study SOSIG. Aslib Proceedings, 52(6), 2000, p.222-224.

(13) What you say about RUDI: taken from the RUDI mailing list and discussion pages. Available at: http://rudi.herts.ac.uk/publicity/praise.htm (visited 08 June 2000).

(14) BUBL: User feedback. Available at: http://bubl.ac.Uk/admin/reports/report98.htm#8.4 (visited 08 July 2000).

(15) Ramsden, A. ELINOR: Electronic Library Project. London: Bowker-Saur, 1998, p.133.

(16) Dalton, P. and Nankivell, C. Builder: An Analysis of User Accesses and Feedback from 19 December 1998 to 25 June 1999. Available at: http://builder.bham.ac.uk/ reports/html/exam.asp (visited 22/02/00).

(17) Khalil, M.A. Digital Libraries: their usage from the end user point of view. The City College of New York, 2000 (unpublished).

(18) East, H., Sheppard, E. and Jeal, Y. A Huge Leap Forward: a quantitative and qualitative examination of the development of access to database services by British Universities, 1988-1994. London: British Library Research & Innovation Centre, 1995, p.2. (British Library R&D Report No. 6202).

(19) King, I. and Moffat, M. Evaluation of the EEVL Pilot Service. Heriot-Watt University, 1996. Available at: http://www.eevl.ac.uk/evaluation/report.html (visited 01 May 1999).

(20) Internet Library of Early Journals (ILEJ): Final Report, March 1999. Available at: http://www.rsl.ox.ac.uk/ilej/papers/frl999/ (visited 04 April 1999).

(21) Monopoli, M. and Nicholas, D. A User-Centred Approach to the Evaluation of Subject Based Information Gateways: case study SOSIG. Aslib Proceedings, 52(6), 2000, p.227-229.

(22) Monopoli, M. and Nicholas, D. A User-Centred Approach to the Evaluation of Subject Based Information Gateways: case study SOSIG. Aslib Proceedings, 52(6), 2000, p.230.

(23) East, H., Sheppard, E. and Jeal, Y. A Huge Leap Forward: a quantitative and qualitative examination of the development of access to database services by British Universities, 1988-1994. London: British Library Research & Innovation Centre, 1995, p.2. (British Library R&D Report No. 6202).

(24) King, I. and Moffat, M. Evaluation of the EEVL Pilot Service. Heriot-Watt University, 1996. Available at: http://www.eevl.ac.uk/evaluation/report.html(visited 01 May 1999).

(25) Monopoli, M. and Nicholas, D. A User-Centred Approach to the Evaluation of Subject Based Information Gateways: case study SOSIG. Aslib Proceedings, 52(6), 2000, p.231.

(26) Khalil, M.A. Digital Libraries: their usage from the end user point of view. The City College of New York, 2000 (unpublished).

(27) Bishop, A. P. Measuring Access, Use, and Success in Digital Libraries, 1998. Available at: http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/04-02/bishop.html (visited 08 February 2000).

(28) Ramsden, A. ELINOR: Electronic Library Project. London: Bowker-Saur, 1998, p.75.

(29) Headline Newsletter: Hybrid Electronic Access and Delivery in the Library Networked Environment (1999) What Users want from the Hybrid Library? Available at: http://www.headline.ac.uk (visited 09 April 1999).

(30) Goldberg, J. Why web usage statistics are (worse than) meaningless. Available at: http://www.cranfield.ac.uk/docs/stats/ (visited 02 April 2000).

(31) Ferry, A. 1996 Survey of User Information Needs and Search Methods Results. Available at: http://www.adam.ac.uk/adam/reports/survey/ (visited 30 May 1999).

(32) Bawden, D. User-oriented evaluation of information systems and services. Aldershot: Gower, 1990, p. 41.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS