Self-archiving practice and the influence of publisher policies in the social sciences

Watkinson, A. Securing authenticity of scholarly

paternity and integrity, Book Industry Communication,

2003.

Frankel, M. S., et al. Defining and

certifying electronic publication in science: a proposal

to the International Association of STM Publishers.

Learned Publishing, 2000:13(4)

Lynch, C. When documents deceive:

trust and provenance as new factors for information

retrieval in a tangled web. Journal of the American

Society for Information Science and Technology,

2001:52(1)

Rowlands,I.and Nicholas,D.New journalpublishing

models: an international survey of senior researchers.

A CIBER report for the Publishers Association and

the International Association of STM Publishers,

2005

Swan, A. and Brown, S. Open access self-archiving:

an author study. Key Perspectives Limited, 2005

Harnad, S. and Brody, T. Comparing the impact

of open access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same

journals. D-Lib Magazine, 2004: June.

Kurtz, M. J.,Eichhorn, G.,Accomazzi,A., Grant, C.,

Demleitner, M., and Murray, S. S. Worldwide use and

impact of the NASA Astrophysics Data System digital

library, Journal of the American Society for Information

Science and Technology, 2005:56(1)

Antelman, K. Do open access articles have a greater research

impact? College & Research Libraries, 2004:65(5)

Wren, J.D. Open access and openly

accessible: a study of scientific publications shared via

the internet. BMJ, 2005:330.

Mabe,M.A.and Amin,M.DrJekylland Dr Hyde:

author–reader asymmetries in scholarly publishing.

Aslib Proceedings, 2002:54(3).

Guédon, J. C. The

‘green’ and ‘gold’ roads to open access: the case for

mixing and matching. Serials Review, 2004:30(4)

Gadd, E., Oppenheim, C., and Probets, S.

RoMEO Studies 3: how academics expect to use

open-access research papers. Journal of Librarianship

and Information Science, 2003:35(3).

Guédon, J. C. The ‘green’ and ‘gold’ roads to open

access: the case for mixing and matching. Serials

Review, 2004:30(4).

SHERPA Publisher Copyright Policies & Self-

archiving (http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeoinfo.html).

Frankel, M. S.,Elliott, R.,Blume,M., Bourgois,J.M.,

Hugenholtz, B., Lindquist, M. G., Morris, S., and

Sandewell, E. Defining and certifying electronic

publication in science. Learned Publishing, 2000:13

(4)

Gadd, E.,Oppenheim, C.,Probets,S.RoMEO Studies4:

an analysis of journal publishers’ copyright agreements.

Learned Publishing, 2003:16(4).

Pinfield, S. How do physicists use an e-print archive? Implications for

institutional e-print services. D-Lib Magazine, 2001:

Dec, 5.

JISC Disciplinary Differences Report, Sparks, S.,

Rightscom Ltd, 2005, 49.

Gadd, E. and Oppenheim, C. RoMEO Studies 1: the impact of

copyright ownership on academic author self-

archiving. Journal of Documentation, 2003:59(3)

Ober, J. Postprint Repository Services:

Context and Feasibility at the University of

California, Final Draft, 2005.

Goodman, D. The criteria for open access. Serials

Review, 2004:30(4).

Pinfield, S. How do physicists use an e-print archive?

Implications for institutional e-print services, D-Lib

Magazine, 2001: Dec, 5. (http://www.dlib.org/dlib/

december01/pinfield/12pinfield.html).

Wren,J.D.Open access and openly accessible: a

study of scientific publications shared via the internet.

BMJ, 2005:330.

Watkinson, A. Securing authenticity of scholarly

paternity and integrity, Book Industry Communication,

2003.

Whitley, R. The Intellectual and Social Organization of

the Sciences, New York, Oxford University Press, 2000.

Becher,T.and Trowler, P. R. Academic Tribes and

Territories, The Society for Research into Higher

Education,& Open University Press, 2001.

‘What Authors Want’: the ALPSP research study on

the motivations and concerns of contributors to

learned journals. Learned Publishing, 1999:12 (3).

King, R., Spector, L., and McKim, G. The guild

model. Journal of Electronic Publishing 2002:8(1).

Guédon, J. C. In Oldenburg’s long shadow: librarians,

research scientists, publishers, and the control of

scientific publishing. In ARL (Association of Research

Libraries) Proceedings, 138. May 2001 Membership

Meeting, 22.

Fry, J. Scholarly research and information practices: a

domain analytic approach. Information Processing &

Management 2006:42.