A new relation for multidisciplinary knowledge organization systems: dependence

Gnoli, Claudio and Bosch, Mela and Mazzocchi, Fulvio . A new relation for multidisciplinary knowledge organization systems: dependence., 2007 In: Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge, proceedings of the Eighth ISKO-Spain Conference 18-20 April 2007 León, Spain. Universidad de León, Secretariado de Publicaciones), pp. 399-409. [Book chapter]

[img]
Preview
 PDF
Gnoli_Bosch_MazzocchiDependence_A_new_relationship_for_multidisciplinary_KOS.pdf
Download (229kB) | Preview

English abstract

Most existing knowledge organization systems (KOS) are based on disciplines. However, as research is increasingly multidisciplinary, scholars need tools allowing them to explore relations between phenomena throughout the whole spectrum of knowledge. We focus on the dependence relationship, holding between one phenomenon and those at lower integrative levels on which it depends for its existence, like alpinism on mountains, and mountains on rocks. This relationship was first described by D.J. Foskett in the context of CRG's work towards a non-disciplinary scheme. We discuss its possible status and representation in three kinds of KOS: thesauri, classification schemes, and ontologies. In thesaural structures, dependence could be one of the subtypes of associative relationships (RT) which have been wished to enrich their semantic functions. In classification, it could act together with hierarchy as a structuring principle, providing a way of connecting and sorting main classes based on integrative levels. In ontologies, it could be defined as a dependsOn direct slot, expressing the fact that through it a class does not inherit all properties of the other class on which it depends. We argue that providing search interfaces with cross-disciplinary links of this kind can give users more adequate tools to examine the recorded knowledge through creative paths overcoming some limitations of its canonical segmentation into disciplines.

Spanish abstract

Resumen: La mayor parte de los sistemas de organización del conocimiento se fundamentan en disciplinas. Sin embargo a medida que la investigación crece en ámbitos multidisciplinarios, se necesitan herramientas que permitan explorar relaciones entre fenómenos a través de todo el espectro de conocimiento. Nos centramos en la relación de dependencia que es la que se establece entre un fenómeno y aquéllos de nivel inferior de los que depende para poder existir, por ejemplo la relación entre alpinismo y montañas, y la que se establece entre montañas y rocas. Esta relación fue descripta por Foskett en el contexto del trabajo del Classification Research Group dirigido a la elaboración de un esquema de representación no disciplinario. Analizamos el posible desarrollo y modo de representación de la relación de dependencia en tres tipos de sistemas de organización del conocimiento: los tesauros, los esquemas clasificatorios y las ontologías. En las estructuras de tesauro la relación de dependencia puede ser uno de los subtipos de las relaciones asociativas (RT) las cuales por medio de esta relación pueden enriquecer sus funciones semánticas. En las clasificaciones la relación de dependencia se podría utilizar junto con la jerarquía como principio estructurante ofreciendo una forma de conectar y organizar clases principales basadas en niveles de integración. En las ontologías la relación de dependencia puede ser definida como un slot directo, que denominamos dependsOn el cual que indica restricciones a la herencia de las propiedades de la clase de la cual depende. Sostenemos que al proporcionar a las interfaces de búsqueda la posibilidad de enlaces transdiciplinarios a través de esta relación se puede dotar a los usuarios de un más adecuado instrumento para examinar el conocimiento acumulado, abriendo la posibilidad a caminos creativos salvando algunas de las limitaciones de la tradicional segmentación en disciplinas

Item type: Book chapter
Keywords: classification, dependence, disciplines vs. phenomena, integrative levels, ontologies, relationships, thesauri
Subjects: A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AB. Information theory and library theory.
Depositing user: Mela Bosch
Date deposited: 21 May 2007
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:07
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/9558

References

American Library Association. Final report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject analysis committee. 1997.<http://www.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/catalogingsection/catcommittees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/finalreport.htm>. [Consulted: 3 nov. 2006].

Austin, D. Prospects for a new general classification. Journal of librarianship, 1969, 1, n. 3, p. 149-169.

Beghtol, C. Within, among, between: three faces of interdisciplinarity. Canadian journal of information science, 1995, 20, n. 2, p. 30-41.

Beghtol, C. Knowledge domains: multidisciplinarity and bibliographic classification systems. Knowledge organization, 1998, 25, n. 1-2, p. 1-12.

Beghtol, C. General classification systems: structural principles for multidisciplinary specification. In: Mustafa el Hadi, W.; Maniez, J.; Pollitt, S.A. (eds.). Structures and relations in knowledge organization: proc. 5th International ISKO conference, Lille, 25-29 aug. 1998. Wzburg: Ergon, 1998, p. 89-96.

Broughton, V. Essential classification. London: Facet, 2004.

Cranefield, S. Networked knowledge representation and exchange using UML and RDF [electronic resource]. Journal of digital information, 2001, 1, n. 8. <http://jodi.tamu.edu/Articles/v01/i08/Cranefield/>. [Consulted: 3 nov. 2006].

Dextre Clarke, S.G. Thesaural relationships. In: Bean C. & Green R. (eds.). Relationships in the organization of knowledge. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2001, p. 37-52.

Fisher, D.H. From thesauri towards ontologies? In: Mustafa el Hadi, W.; Maniez, J.; Pollitt, S.A. (eds.). Structures and relations in knowledge organization: proc. 5th Int. ISKO Conference, Lille, 25-29 aug. Würzburg: Ergon, 1998, p. 18-30.

Foskett, D.J. Classification and integrative levels. In: Foskett, D.J; Palmer, B.I. (eds.). The Sayers memorial volume. London: Library Association, 1961, p. 136-150. Republished in: Chan, L.M.; Richmond, P.A.; Svenonius, E. (eds.). Theory of subject analysis. Littleton: Libraries unlimited, 1985, p. 210-220.

Foskett, D.J. Concerning general and special classifications. International classification, 1991, 18, n. 2, p. 87-91.

Gatto, E. Variazione locale e comunicabilità globale [electronic resource]. In: Classificare la documentazione locale: giornata di studio, San Giorgio di Nogaro, 17 dic. 2005. ISKO Italia. <http://www.iskoi.org/doc/locale.htm>. [Consulted: 11 nov. 2006].

Gnoli, C. The meaning of facets in non-disciplinary classification. In: Budin, G.; Swertz, C.; Mitgutsch, K. (eds.). Knowledge organization for a global learning society: proc. 9th International ISKO conference, Vienna, 4-7 jul. 2006. Würzburg: Ergon, 2006, p. 11-18.

Gnoli, C. Phylogenetic classification. Knowledge organization, 2006, 33, in prep.

Gnoli, C.; Hong M. Freely faceted classification for Web-based information retrieval. New review of hypermedia & multimedia, 2006, 12, n. 1, p. 63-81.

Gnoli, C.; Merli, G. Notazione e interfaccia di ricerca per una classificazione a livelli. AIDA informazioni, 2005, 23, n, 1-2, p, 57-72.

Gnoli, C.; Poli, R. Levels of reality and levels of representation. Knowledge organization, 2004, 31, n. 3, p. 151-160.

Hjørland, B.; Albrechtsen, H. Toward a new horizon in information science: domain-analysis. Journal of the American society for information science, 1995, 46, n. 6, p. 400-425.

Hong M. A phenomenon approach to faceted classification [in Japanese]. In: Japan society of Library and information science 53th conference, Keio university, 22-23 oct. 2005. English abstract: <http://www.iskoi.org/ilc/phenomenon.htm>. [Consulted: 11 nov. 2006].

International Organization for Standardization. ISO 2788:1986: Guidelines for the establishment and development of monolingual thesauri. 2nd. ed. Geneva: ISO, 1986.

ISKO Italia. Integrative level classification: research project [electronic resource]. 2004-. <http://www.iskoi.org/ilc/>. [Consulted: 11 nov. 2006].

Kyle, B. Towards a classification for social science literature. American documentation. 1958, 9, p. 168-183.

Kyle, B. An examination of some of the problems involved in drafting general classifications and some proposals for their solution. Review of documentation, 1959, 26, n. 1, p. 17-21.

Langridge, D. Bliss, the disciplines and the New Age. Bliss classification bulletin, 1992, 34, p. 8-13.

Mazzocchi, F.; Plini, P. Refining thesaurus relational structure: implications and opportunities. In: Compatibility and heterogeneity, ethics and future of knowledge organization: proc. 10th German ISKO conference, Vienna, 3-5 jul. 2006. Würzburg: Ergon, 2007.

McIlwaine, I.C. Interdisciplinarity: a new retrieval problem? In: Beghtol, C.; Howarth, L.C.; Williamson, N. (eds.). Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: proc. 6th International ISKO conference, Toronto, 10-13 jul. 2000. Würzburg: Ergon, 2000, p. 261-267.

Noy, N.F.; McGuinness D.L. Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology. Stanford University, 2001. <http://protege.stanford.edu/publications/ontology_development/ontology101-noy-mcguinness.html>. [Consulted: 3 nov. 2006].

Poli, R. The basic problem of the theory of levels of reality. Axiomathes, 2001, 12, n. 3-4, p. 261-283.

Schmitz-Esser , W. Thesaurus and beyond: an advanced formula for linguistic engineering and information retrieval. Knowledge organization, 1999, 26, n. 1, p. 10-22.

Shirky, C. Ontology is overrated: categories, links, and tags [electronic resource]. In: Clay Shirky's writings about the Internet . 2005. <http://www.shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html>. [Consulted: 11 nov. 2006].

Soergel, D. [et al.]. Reengineering thesauri for new applications: the Agrovoc example [electronic resource]. Journal of digital information, 2004, 4, n. 4. <http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v04/i04/Soergel/>. [Consulted: 3 nov. 2006].

Szostak, R. Classifying science: phenomena, data, theory, method, practice. Berlin: Springer, 2004.

Trigari, M. Old problems in a new environment: the impact of the Internet on multilingual thesauri as research interfaces [electronic resource]. In: Thesauri and taxonomies: an international conference and workshop: Multites, London, 29-30 sep. 2003.

Tudhope, D.; Alani, H.; Jones, C. Augmenting thesauri relationships: possibilities for retrieval [electronic resource]. Journal of digital information, 2001, 1, n. 8. <http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v01/i08/Tudhope/>. [Consulted: 3 nov. 2006].

Weinberg, B.H. Complexity in indexing systems: abandonment and failure: implications for organizing the Internet [electronic resource]. In: Hardin, S. (ed.). Global complexity: information chaos and control: proc. 59th ASIS annual meeting. ASIS, 1996.<http://www.asis.org/annual-96/ElectronicProceedings/weinberg.html>. [Consulted: 11 nov. 2006].

Weisgerber, D.W. Interdiscipinary searching: problems and suggested remedies. Journal of documentation, 1993, 49, n. 3, p. 231-254.

Williamson, N. An interdisciplinary world and discipline based classification. In: Mustafa el Hadi, W.; Maniez, J.; Pollitt, S.A. (eds.). Structures and relations in knowledge organization: proc. 5th International ISKO conference, Lille, 25-29 aug. 1998. Würzburg: Ergon, 1998, p. 116-124.

Winston, M.E.; Chaffin, R.; Herrmann, D.A taxonomy of part-whole relations. Cognitive science, 1987, 11, p. 417-444.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS