E-LIS, Eprints in Library and Information Science Homepage E-LIS, Eprints in Library and Information Science
   home   |   about   |   search   |   browse   |   register   |   registered users area   |   help   |   FAQ   |   JITA   

The Shifting Balance of Intellectual Trade in Information Studies

Cronin, Blaise and Meho, Lokman I. (2008) The Shifting Balance of Intellectual Trade in Information Studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(4):pp. 551-564.

Full text available as:
PDF - Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.

View statistics for this eprint

Abstract

The authors describe a large-scale, longitudinal citation analysis of intellectual trading between information studies and cognate disciplines. The results of their investigation reveal the extent to which information studies draws on and, in turn, contributes to the ideational substrates of other academic domains. Their data show that the field has become a more successful exporter of ideas as well as less introverted than was previously the case. In the last decade, information studies has begun to contribute significantly to the literatures of such disciplines as computer science and engineering on the one hand and business and management on the other, while also drawing more heavily on those same literatures.

Keywords:Citation analysis, scholarly communication, interdisciplinarity, bibliometrics
Subjects:A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AC. Relationship of LIS with other fields .
B. Information use and sociology of information. > BB. Bibliometric methods.
ID Code:12941
Deposited By:Meho, Lokman I.
Deposited On:10 March 2008
Alternative Locations:http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/117860654/PDFSTART?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0, http://www.slis.indiana.edu/faculty/meho/cronin-meho-03.pdf
All fields:Show all fields

Arhonditsis, G. B., Adams-VanHaren, B. A., Nielsen, L., Stow, C. A., & Reckhow, K. H. (2006). Evaluation of the current state of mechanistic aquatic biogeochemical modeling: Citation analysis and future perspectives. Environmental Science & Technology, 40(21), 6547-6554.

Bates, M. J. (1996). Learning about the information seeking of interdisciplinary scholars and students. Library Trends, 45, 155-164.

Bedeian, A. G. (2005). Crossing disciplinary boundaries: A epilegomenon for Lockett and McWilliams. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(2), 151-155.

Borgman, C. L. & Rice, R. E. (1992). The convergence of information science and communication: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(6), 397-411.

Bowker, G. C. (2005). Memory practices in the sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Buttlar, L. J. (1999). Information sources in library and information science doctoral research. Library & Information Science Research, 21(2), 227-245.

Chapman, K. & Brothers, P. (2006). Database coverage for research in management information systems. College & Research Libraries, 67(1), 50-62.

Cronin, B. (2002). Holding the center while prospecting at the periphery: Domain identity and coherence in North American information studies education. Education for Information, 20(1), 2002, 1-8.

Cronin, B. & Pearson, S. (1990). The export of ideas from information science. Journal of Information Science, 16, 381-391.

Ellis, D., Allen, D., & Wilson, T. (1999). Information science and information systems: Conjunct subjects disjunct disciplines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1095-1107.

Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2005). Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 8-24.

Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. New York: Wiley.

Goldstone, R. L. & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The import and export of Cognitive Science. Cognitive Science, 30, 983-993.

Grover, V., Ayyagari, R., Gokhale, R., Lim, J., & Coffey, J. (2006). A citation analysis of the evolution and state of information systems within a constellation of reference disciplines. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(5), 270-325.

Harnad, S. (2007). Open Access Scientometrics and the UK Research Assessment Exercise. Proceedings of 11th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Madrid, Spain. June 25 2006. Available at: http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/13804/

Kärki, R. (1996). Searching for bridges between disciplines: an author co-citation analysis on the research into scholarly communication. Journal of Information Science, 22(5), 323-334,

Keen, P. G. W. (1980). MIS research: Reference disciplines and a cumulative tradition. First International Conference on Information Systems, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 9-18.

Liu, Z., & Wang, C. Z. (2005). Mapping interdisciplinarity in demography: a journal network analysis. Journal of Information Science, 31(4), 308-316.

Lockett, A. & McWilliams, A. (2005). The balance of trade between disciplines. Do we effectively manage knowledge? Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(2), 139-150.

Mason, R. O., McKenney, J. L., & Copeland, D. G. (1997). Developing an historical tradition in MIS research. MIS Quarterly, 21(3), 257-278.

McKechnie, L. E. F., Goodall, G. R., Lajoie-Paquette, D., & Julien, H. (2005). How human information behaviour researchers use each other's work: a basic citation analysis study. Information Research. Available at: http://informationr.net/ir/10-2/paper220.html

Menand, L. (2005). Dangers within and without. Profession 2005, 10-17.

Meyer, T. (1996). A citation analysis study of library science: Who cites librarians? College & Research Libraries, 57, 23-33.

Miyamoto, S., Midorikawa, N., & Nakayama, K. (1990). A view on studies on bibliometrics and related studies in Japan. In: Borgman, C. L. (Ed.). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 73-83.

Mote, L. J. B. (1962). Reasons for the variation of information needs of scientists. Journal of Documentation, 18, 169-175.

Nisonger, T. E. & Davis, C. H. (2005). The perception of library and information science journals by LIS education deans and ARL library directors: A replication of the Kohl-Davis study. College & Research Libraries, 66, 341-77.

Peritz, B. C., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2002). The sources used by bibliometrics-scientometrics as reflected in references. Scientometrics, 54(2), 269–284.

Rice, R. E., Borgman, C. L., & Reeves, B. (1988). Citation networks of communication journals, 1977-1985: Cliques and positions, citations made and citations received. Human Communication Research, 15, 256-283.

Swanson, D. R. (1986). Fish oil, Raynaud's syndrome and undiscovered public knowledge. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 30(1), 7-18.

Talja, S. (2005). The domain analytic approach to scholars' information practices. In: Fisher, K. E., Erdelez, S., & McKechnie, E. F. (Eds.). Theories of information behavior. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 123-127.

Tang, R. (2004). Evolution of the interdisciplinary characteristics of information and library science. In: Proceedings of the 67th ASIS&T Annual Meeting, 54-63.

Urata, H. (1990). Information flows among academic disciplines in Japan. Scientometrics, 18, 309-319.

White, H. D. (2004). Citation analysis and discourse analysis revisited. Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 89-116.

Archive Staff Only: edit this record

   home   |   about   |   search   |   browse   |   register   |   registered users area   |   help   |   FAQ   |   JITA   

Send comments and questions to      |     E-LIS is hosted by AEPIC at CILEA      |     Powered by GNU Eprints software