Kajian Koleksi Bidang Linguistik dengan Metode Conspectus di Perpustakaan Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya, Universitas Indonesia

Hardi, Wishnu Kajian Koleksi Bidang Linguistik dengan Metode Conspectus di Perpustakaan Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya, Universitas Indonesia., 2005 Undergraduate Final Thesis thesis, Universitas Indonesia (Indonesia). [Thesis]

[img]
Preview
PDF
FINAL_THESES-CONSPECTUS.pdf

Download (1696Kb) | Preview

English abstract

The objective of this research is to identify the existing collection strength, especially on Lingustics, in the Faculty of Humanities Library, Universitas Indonesia. Conspectus Model, a collection-based technique evaluation, is used on this qualitative research. The research was conducted on January - March 2006, which are involved subject specialist as evaluator, and students as the user. The research is also purposed to design initial framework of the academic library network in Jakarta, especially on Linguistics.

Indonesian abstract

Penelitian dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keadaan aktual koleksi buku untuk subjek Linguistik Umum di Perpustakaan Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya Universitas Indonesia. Dari deskripsi tersebut kemudian dapat diperoleh informasi mengenai peta kekuatan dan kelemahan koleksi menuju terbentuknya koleksi inti (core collection) untuk subjek Linguistik. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif. Metode evaluasi yang digunakan adalah metode conspectus yang termasuk dalam kategori teknik evaluasi yang memfokuskan pada keadaan koleksi itu sendiri (collection-based technique) dengan mengambil objek penelitian di Perpustakaan Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya Universitas Indonesia. Selain untuk mengetahui kekuatan dan kelemahan koleksi, penelitian ini juga diharapkan dapat dijadikan paramater kualitas koleksi yang berguna untuk internal perpustakaan yakni pembenahan manajemen koleksi dan eksternal perpustakaan yakni sebagai dasar pertimbangan untuk pembentukan kerja sama perpustakaan perguruan tinggi untuk subjek sejenis. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa koleksi subjek Linguistik di Perpustakaan FIB berada pada kisaran 1a sampai 2b yang masih jauh dari level yang diharapkan oleh evaluator yakni 5F. Penilaian terhadap kekuatan koleksi yang dilakukan oleh evaluator pada kenyataannya sangat dipengaruhi oleh variasi judul-judul yang tersedia. Analisis bahasa pada subjek linguistik memperlihatkan bahwa mayoritas koleksi untuk tiap kelas memiliki indikator E yang berarti bahan literatur berbahasa Inggris mendominasi. Cakupan kronologis pada subjek linguistik bisa dikatakan kurang relevan dengan kebutuhan informasi yang mutakhir. Bahan literatur terbitan 5 tahun terakhir hanya mencapai 3%.di mana idealnya mencapai 10%.

Item type: Thesis (UNSPECIFIED)
Keywords: collection management, conspectus, academic library, core collection, wishnu hardi, universitas indonesia, library and information science, collection evaluation method, library policy, library network
Subjects: A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information.
Depositing user: Wishnu Hardi
Date deposited: 21 Aug 2007
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:09
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/10249

References

"SEEK" links will first look for possible matches inside E-LIS and query Google Scholar if no results are found.

Abell, Millicent D. 1987. “The Conspectus: Issues and Questions” In Association of Research Libraries, NCIP: Means to an End; Minutes of the 109th Meeting, October 22-23, 1986, Washington D.C. Washington: Association of Research Libraries. Hlm. 22-23.

American Library Association. 1990. Guidelines for Branch Libraries in College andUniversities. <http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/guidelinesbranc-h.htm>. Akses tanggal 27 Januari 2005.

American Library Association. Resources and Technical Services Division. 1989. Guide for Written Collection Policy Statements. 2 ed. Edited by Bonita Bryant. Chicago: American Library Association. Hlm.13-29.

American Library Association. 1987. The Mission of a University Undergraduate Library: Model Statement.

<http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/missio-nuniversity.htm>. Akses tanggal 27 Januari 2005.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 1995. Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Hlm.134.

Branin, J. Joseph. Shifting Boundaries: Managing Research Library Collection at the Beginning of the 21st Century. <http://www.rlg.org/globhan.html>. Akses tanggal 11 Januari 2005.

Brennan, M.A. 1991. Trends and Issues in Library and Information Science. <http://ericdigest/ed340389.html>. Akses tanggal 18 Desember 2004.

Columbia University Libraries. 2003. Collection Depth Indicators. <http://www.c-olumbia.edu/cu/lweb/services/colldev/collection-depth.html>. Akses tanggal 11 Januari 2005.

Credaro, Amanda. 2001. Collection Evaluation in School Libraries. <http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Styx/7534/UNIVERSITY/TLship/CollEval.html>. Akses tanggal 18 Desember 2004.

Eisenberg, M.B. 1989. Trends in Library and Information Science. Hlm.5

Ekmekcioglu, Cuna and Dennis Nicholson. 2001. An Evaluation of the Current Approach to Collaborative Collection Management in SCURL Libraries and Alternatives to Conspectus.

Evans, G. Edward. 1979. Developing Library Collections. Littleton: Libraries Unlimited. Hlm.68.

Faisal, Sanapiah. 1998. Format-format Penelitian Sosial. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada. Hlm.20.

Ferguson, Anthony W., Joan Grant, and Joel Rutstein. 1988. “The RLG Conspectus: Its Uses and Benefits”, College and Research Libraries 49 (May). Hlm.107.

Ferguson, Anthony W., Joan Grant, and Joel Rutstein. 1987. “Internal Uses of The RLG Conspectus”, Journal of Library Administration 8 (Summer). Hlm.23.

Finch, Jannete, Elizabeth Williams, and Tom Gilson. 2001. Refference Collection Assessment at the College of Charleston. <http://www.cofc.edu/~finchj/refc-on.pdf>. Akses tanggal 24 Oktober 2004.

Fowler, Rena K. 1998. “The University Library as Learning Organization for Innovation: An Exploratory Study,” College and Research Libraries, January Vol. 59 No.1. Hlm.223.

Fragkou-Batsiou, Anna, et al. The Conspectus Method Application to Scientific Journals: The Greek Case Study. <http://leykada.physics.auth.gr/eeisfragkou-.html>. akses tanggal 10 Januari 2005.

Grant, Joan. 1992. “The Conspectus: An Important Component of a Comprehensive Collection Management Program”, Collection Assesment: A Look at the RLG Conspectus. Ed. Richard J. Wood and Katina Strauch. New York: Haworth Press, Inc. Hlm. 97-104.

Griffith University Library. 1997. Collection Development and Information Access Policy. <http://www.griffith.edu.au/ins/collections/cdevpolicy/collde-v.pdf>. Akses tanggal 10 Januari 2005.

Gwinn, Nancy E., and Paul Mosher H. 1983. “Coordinating Collection Development: The RLG Conspectus”, College and Research Libraries 44 (March).

Hall, Blaine H. 1985. Collection Assesment Manual for College and University Libraries. Phoenix: Oryx Press. Hlm.9.

Hanger, Stephen. 1987. “Collection Development in the British Library: The Role of The RLG Conspectus”, Journal of Librarianship 19 (April). Hlm.107.

Hardesty, Larry. 1991. Why Do We Need Academic Libraries?. <http://www.ala.o-rg/acrl/academiclib.html>. Akses tanggal 10 Januari 2005.

Hassan, Fuad. “Perpustakaan Sebagai Pusat Pembelajaran dan Agen Perubahan Sosial,”.<http://202.155.38.12/download/pdf/e_papers/2004515135625.pdf>Akses tanggal 2 Oktober 2004.

Henige, David. 1987. “Epistemological Dead End and Ergonomic Disaster? : The North American Collection Inventory Project”, Journal of Academic Librarianship 13 (September). Hlm.213.

Hernon, Peter and Charles McClure.1988. Evaluation and Library Decision Making. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation. Hlm.1.

Holt, Brian F.G and Stephen Hanger. 1986. Consepctus in The British Library: A Summary of Current Collection Intensity Data as Recorded on RLG Conspectus Worksheets with Completed Worksheets on Microfiche. London: The British Library. Hlm.47, 10-14.

International Federation Library Association and Instituions. 2001. Guidelines for A Collection Development Policy Using the Conspectus Model. <http://www.ifla.org/VII/s14>. Akses tanggal 21 Desember 2004.

Koentjaraningrat.1991. Metode Penelitian Masyarakat. Jakarta: Gramedia. Hlm.2-9.

Kountur, Ronny. 2002. Metode Penelitian untuk Penulisan Skripsi dan Tesis. Jakarta: PPM. Hlm.53, 105-106.

Lancaster, F.W. 1982. “Evaluating Collections by Their Use,” Collection Management, Vol.4 No.1/2. Hlm.15.

Lancaster, F.W. 1980. The Measurement and Evaluation of Library Services. Arlington: Information Resources Press. Hlm.40.

Line, Maurice B. 1990. Academic Library Management. London: Library Associaton Publication. Hlm.15.

MacEwan, Bonnie. 1989. “The North American Collection Inventory Project: A Tool for Selection, Education and Communication”, Library Acquisitions: Practice and Theory 13 No.1. Hal.45-50.

Matheson, Ann. “Collection Level Description: A Review of Existing Practice”. <http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/cld/study/collection/conspectus/>_. Akses tanggal 21 Desember 2004.

McEldowney, Philip F. 1994. The “How” and “Who” of Collection Development in Academic Libraries. <www.people.virginia.edu/~pm9k/libsci/how3cd.doc>. Akses tanggal 9 April 2005.

Michalak, Sarah. 1994. “Planning Academic Library Facilities: The Library will Have the Walls”, Journal of Library Administration Vol. 20 No.2. Hlm.98.

Mount Saint Vincent University. Collection Development Policy Manual. <http://www.msvu.ca/library/cdrVI2.htm>. Akses tanggal 21 Desember 2004.

Mosher, Paul. 1985. “A National Scheme for Collaboration in Collection Development: The RLG-NCIP Effort”, Resource Sharing and Information Networks, 2, 2/3 (Spring/Summer). Hlm.17.

Munroe, H. Mary and Jennie E Ver Steeg. 2004. “The Decision-Making Process in Conspectus Evaluation of Collections: The Quest for Certainty”, Library Quarterly April Vol. 74. Hlm.181.

Nera, Corazon M. 1993. Introduction to Asean Librarianship: Academic Libraries. Jakarta: The Asean Committe on Culture and Information. Hlm.2.

Nissonger, Thomas E. 1992. Collection Evaluation in Academic Libraries: A Literature Guide and Annotated Bibliography. Colorado: Libraries Unlimited. Hlm.120-132.

New South Wales Department of School Eduation. 1996. Handbook for School Libraries. NSW: Curriculum Directorate, NSW Department of School Education. Hlm.25.

Nuraini, Atikah. 1998. “Evaluasi Koleksi pada Pusat Dokumentasi Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia: Penerapan Metode Checklist dan Conspectus”, Tesis. Hlm.115-116.

Oke, Graeme. Cumulative Approach to Collection Evaluation. <http://w2.vu.edu/library/info/alia98.htm>. Akses tanggal 18 Desember 2004.

Pendit S, Murtini. 1986. “Relevansi Antara Perpustakaan dan Koleksi Pustaka” dalam Hasil Kongres 3 Ikatan Pustakawan Indonesia, Yogyakarta, 22-24 September 1983. Editor Heddy Suprihadi. Jakarta: IPI. Hlm.67.

Perpustakaan Nasional RI. 1998. Pedoman Umum Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta: Perpustakaan Nasional RI. Hlm.1

Peters, T.A. 1998. “Asessing the Use of Academic Library Collection”, Journal of Library AdministrationVo.20. No.2 Hlm.5.

Powell, Nancy and Mary Bushing. 1992. WLN Collection Assessment Manual 4th Ed. Washington: Western Library Network. Hlm 13 & 37.

Prytherch, Ray. 1990. Harrod’s Librarians’ Glossary: of Terms Used in Librarianship, Documentation, and the Book Crafts. England: Gower Publishing. Hlm.174.

Ratchlife, F.W. 1980. The Growth of University Library Collection in the United Kingdom. London: Saur/Bingley. Hlm.7.

Research Libraries Group. A Brief History of the RLG Conspectus. <http://www.rl-g.org/conspechist.html>. Akses tanggal 11 Januari 2005.

Ratchlife, F.W. Conspectus Background. <http://www.rlg.org/en/page.p-hp?page_ID=7701>. Akses tanggal 11 Januari 2005.

Roesma, Lily. 1992. “Perpustakaan Perguruan Tinggi: Filsafat dan Peranan” dalam Laporan Lokakarya Pengembangan Perpustakaan Perguruan Tinggi Negeri di Bogor, 11 – 13 Februari 1992 yang diselenggarakan oleh Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi. Hlm.1.

Saunders, Stewart. 1983. “Student Reliance on Faculty Guidance in the Selection of Reading Materials: The Use of Core Collections”, Collection Management Vol. 4(4). Hlm.10.

Scott, Marianne. 1987. “The National Plan for Collection Inventories”, Canadian Library Journal 44 (October). Hlm.289-290.

Septiyantono, Tri. 2003. Dasar-dasar Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi. Yogyakarta: IAIN Sunan Kalijaga. Hlm.11.

Sevilla, Consuelo G. et al. 1993. Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: UI-Press. Hlm.71.

Stam, David. 1987. “Development and Use of the RLG Conspectus” In Association of Research Libraries, NCIP: Means to an End; Minutes of the 109th Meeting, October 22-23, 1986, Washington D.C. Washington D.C: Association of Research Libraries. Hlm.7-10.

Stark, Marylin M. 1985. “Evaluating the Geoscience Collection”, Collection Management 13, nos 1/2. Hlm.108.

Stielow, Frederick J. And Helen R. Tibbo.1987. “Collection Analysis and the Humanities: A Practicum with the RLG Conspectus”, Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 27 (Winter). Hlm.27.

Strauss, A.L. 1987. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientist. New York: Cambiridge University Press. Hlm.11.

Sugiyono. 2001. Metode Penelitian Administrasi. Bandung: Alfabeta. Hlm.59.

Sulistyo-Basuki. 1991. Pengantar Ilmu Perpustakaan. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Hlm.51.

Sullivan, Shirley. 1995. Travails of Conspectus Officer. <http://www.nla.go-v.au/libraries/hosted/unimelb.html>. Akses tanggal 11 Januari 2005.

Tanner, K. 1995.”Measuring Library Resource Adequacy: A Review of Previous Literature on Collection Evaluation”, Wagga Wagga, NSW: Centre for Information Studies. Hlm.17.

Tezla, Kathy E. 1990. “Reference Collection Development Using the RLG Conspectus”, Reference Librarian No.29. Hlm.43.

Thweatt, Elizabeth. 1992. “Using the WLN Conspectus to Asses a Law Library Collection”, Advances in Collection Development and Resource ManagementVol.2.

Greenwich: JAI Press. Hlm.21.

Unesco. 2004. Unesco Information Statistics. <http://www.uis.unesco.org/ev.php?-ID=5058_201&IDR=DO_Topic> Akses tanggal 9 April 2005.

University at Albany. Collection and Management Evaluation. <http://albany.edu-/~eag91/BibManual?CollectionManagementAndEvaluation.htm>. Akses tanggal 18 Desember 2004.

University of Tennesse. 2002. Collection Evaluation. <http://www.lib.utk.edu/~c-olldev/procedure/colleval.pdf>. Akses tanggal 18 Desember 2004.

University of Waterloo. Collection Evaluation. <http://www.lib.uwaterloo.ca/doc-uments/collection_evaluation.html>. Akses tanggal 18 Desember 2004.

University of Wyoming. Collection Assessment. <http://www-lib.uwyo/cdo/collas-s.htm>. Akses tanggal 25 Januari 2005.

University of Western Australia Library. Conspectus and Definitions. <http://www.library.uwa.edu.au/collection/subject/formatdeftxt.html>. Akses tanggal 18 Desember 2004.

University of York. 2004. Linguistics in the Library. <http://www.york.ac.uk/serv-ices/library/guides/linguide.htm>. Akses tanggal 11 Januari 2005

Washington Research Library Consortium. The University Libraries Begin to Analize the Collection Using the WLN Conspectus. <http://libraries.cua.edu/-newsletter/lnew9812.htm#Conspectus>. Akses tanggal 11 Januari 2005.

Whaley, John H. 1986. “Groping Toward National Standards for Collection Evaluation”, Show-Me Libraries 37 (March). Hlm.25-28.

Wood, Richard. 1992. “A Conspectus of the Conspectus”, Collection Assesment: A Look at the RLG Conspectus. Ed. Richard J. Wood and Katina Strauch. New York: Haworth Press, Inc. Hlm. 2-3.


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item