All Change : the Ever Evolving Institutional Repository at the University of Melbourne

Fernando, Bernadine and Gibson, Daina All Change : the Ever Evolving Institutional Repository at the University of Melbourne., 2007 . In ALIA National Library and Technicians Conference, Melbourne (Australia), 9-12 October 2007. [Conference paper]

[img]
Preview
PDF
All_Change_elis20071003.pdf

Download (76kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF
allchange07-09-26.pdf

Download (8MB) | Preview

English abstract

Institutional repositories are becoming prevalent in academic libraries as the location for storing theses, research publications, learning objects and other grey literature. This paper will provide brief background information on the history, the role and growth of open access Institutional Repositories and, in particular, will concentrate on the University of Melbourne's repository. The paper will touch upon the origin and changes that it has gone through and its links to the Australasian Digital Theses (ADT) Program. It will also discuss issues for academic involvement, copyright, the Research Quality Framework (RQF) and the benefits of depositing, such as increased citation rates and linking with the University's Themis Enterprise Management tool. In order to raise the profile and the citation rate of the Univerity of Melbourne's research community, the Vice-Chancellor has strongly encouraged researchers to deposit research output into the University of Melbourne ePrint Repository (UMER). This has resulted in new skills development and a change in workflows for institutional repository staff. We shall mainly speak about the role of the members of the institutional repository staff, the workflow implications, and how workflow is managed day to day. To meet the University's priorities and timelines, flexibility and time management are essential. We shall also discuss the interaction needed outside our own team, and the positive feedback and conversations with authors and colleagues. As this is an ever evolving and fast moving field, the paper will reflect on where we are now; however, because of the impact of the RQF, the University of Melbourne's strategic plan, and the implementation of new repository software, changes are to be expected.

Item type: Conference paper
Keywords: institutional repository, open access, scholarly communication, online publishing, eprints, universities
Subjects: H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HS. Repositories.
Depositing user: Daina Gibson
Date deposited: 04 Oct 2007
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:09
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/10460

References

Houghton, J, Steele, C and Sheehan, P 2006, Research Communication Costs in Australia: Emerging Opportunities and Benefits: a Report to the Department of Education, Science and Training, Canberra, DEST, accessed 5 May 2007, <http://www.dest.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/0ACB271F-EA7D-4FAF-B3F7-0381F441B175/13935/DEST_Research_Communications_Cost_Report_Sept2006.pdf>.

Lynch, C 2003, ‘Institutional Repositories: Essential Infrastructure for Scholarship in the Digital Age’ portal: Libraries and the Academy , v.3, issue 2, accessed 22 April 2007, <http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/portal_libraries_and _the_academy/v003/3.2lynch.html>.

National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia) 2006, Project Grants Funding Policy for Funding Commencing in 2008, accessed 15 May 2007, <http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/funding/_files/profundingpol.pdf>

Open Archives Initiative, accessed 19 April 2007, <http://www.openarchives.org/>

Pringle, J 2005, ‘Partnering helps institutional repositories thrive’, KnowledgeLink Newsletter, February, 2005, accessed 14 May 2007, <http://scientific.thomson.com/news/newsletter/2005-02/8264025/>.

SHERPA/RoMEO 2007,‘Publisher Copyright Policies & Self-archiving’, accessed 9 May 2007, < http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo.php>.

Quint, B 2006, ‘Institutional Repositories on Target: ARL Survey and Scopus/Scirus Features’, Information Today, October 5, accessed 7 May 2007, <http://www.infotoday.com/newsbreaks/nb060828-2.shtml>.

Rightscom 2007, Research Funders’ Policies for the Management of Information Outputs A report commissioned by the Research Information Network, accessed 26 April 2007, <http://www.rin.ac.uk/files/Funders'%20Policy%20&%20Practice%20-%20Final%20Report.pdf>.

Richardson, J 2006, ‘Research Quality Framework as a catalyst for open access’, AusWeb06: the Twelfth Australasian World Wide Web Conference, Noosa Lakes, Qld, 1-5 July 2006, accessed 5 May 2007, <http://ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw06/papers/refereed/richardson/paper.html>.

University of Melbourne 2006, Growing Esteem: the University of Melbourne Strategic Plan 2006, accessed 5 May 2007, <http://www.unimelb.edu.au/publications/docs/strategic_plan2006.pdf>.

University of Melbourne 2007, Find an Expert, accessed 15 May 2007, <http://www.findanexpert.unimelb.edu.au/>.

University of Melbourne, Information Services 2007, Information Services: mission, purpose and values, accessed 14 May 2007, <http:www.infodiv.unimelb.edu.au/about/vision.html>.

University of Melbourne 2006, Growing Esteem: the University of Melbourne Strategic Plan 2006, accessed 14 May 2007, <http://www.unimelb.edu.au/publications/docs/strategic_plan2006.pdf>.

University of Melbourne, Office of the Vice-Chancellor 2007, Growing Esteem, accessed 14 May 2007, < http://growingesteem.unimelb.edu.au/>.

Walters, T. 2007, ‘Reinventing the library: how repositories are causing librarians to rethink their professional roles’, portal: Libraries and the Academy, v.7, no.2, pp 213-225, accessed 1 May 2007, <http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/portal_libraries_and_the_academy/v007/7.2walters.html>.

Young, E & Sullivan, S 2003, ‘Establishing an eprint repository at the University of Melbourne: implementation aspects’, Proceedings Educause in Australasia 03, pp 25-35, viewed 21 April 2007, from <http://eprints.infodiv.unimelb.edu.au/archive/00000265/02/eveandshirley.pdf>


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item