Consortial use of electronic journals in Turkish universities

Tonta, Yaşar Consortial use of electronic journals in Turkish universities., 2008 . In ELPUB 2008 International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Toronto (Canada), 25-27 June 2008. (In Press) [Conference paper]

WarningThere is a more recent version of this item available.
[img]
Preview
 PDF
TONTA-UNAL-ELPUB_2008-yt.pdf
Download (395kB) | Preview

English abstract

The use of electronic journals has outnumbered that of printed journals within the last decade. The consortial use of electronic journals through publishers’ or aggregators’ web sites is on the rise worldwide. This is also the case for Turkey. The Turkish academic community downloaded close to 50 million full-text articles from various electronic journal databases since the year 2000. This paper analyzes the seven-years’ worth of journal use data comprising more than 25 million full-text articles downloaded from Elsevier’s ScienceDirect (SD) electronic journals package between 2001 and 2007. Some 100 core journals, constituting only 5% of all SD journal titles, satisfied over 8.4 million download requests. The lists of core journals were quite stable, consistently satisfying one third of all demand. A large number of journal titles were rarely used while some were never used at all. The correlation between the impact factors (IFs) of core journal titles and the number of downloads therefrom was rather low. Findings can be used to develop better consortial collection management policies and empower the consortium management to negotiate better deals with publishers.

Item type: Conference paper
Keywords: Electronic journals, consortial use of electronic journals, core journal titles, Turkish universities, Bradford Law of Scattering, ScienceDirect
Subjects: H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HN. e-journals.
Depositing user: prof. yasar tonta
Date deposited: 21 Jun 2008
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:11
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/11764

Available Versions of this Item

References

Statistics come from the web site of the Student Selection and Admission Center: ÖĞRENCİ SEÇME VE YERLEŞTİRME MERKEZİ. (n.d.). 2006-2007 öğretim yılı yükseköğretim istatistikleri (Higher Education Statistics of 2006-2007 Academic Year). Ankara: ÖSYM. Retrieved 26 March 2008, from http://www.osym.gov.tr/dosyagoster.aspx?DIL=1&BELGEANAH=19176&DOSYAISIM=1_Ogrenci_Say.pdf.

The statistics on the distribution of students by subject disciplines come from p.46, Table 4.2 of TÜRK YÜKSEKÖĞRETİMİNİN BUGÜNKÜ DURUMU (the state of the art of Turkish higher education). (November 2005). Ankara: Higher Education Council. Retrieved, 26 March 2008, from http://www.yok.gov.tr/egitim/raporlar/kasim_2005/kasim_2005.doc.

Statistics come from the web site of the Student Selection and Admission Center: ÖĞRENCİ SEÇME VE YERLEŞTİRME MERKEZİ. (n.d.). 2006-2007 öğretim yılı yükseköğretim istatistikleri (Higher Education Statistics of 2006-2007 Academic Year). Ankara: ÖSYM. Retrieved, 26 March 2008, from http://www.osym.gov.tr/dosyagoster.aspx?DIL=1&BELGEANAH=19176&DOSYAISIM=2_Ogretim_El_Say.pdf.

TONTA, Y. (2001). Collection development of electronic information resources in Turkish university libraries. Library Collections, Acquisitions and Technical Services, 25(3): 291-298.

LINDLEY, J.A., & ERDOĞAN, P.L. (2002). TRNSL: A model site license for ANKOS. (paper) Presented at the Symposium on Research in the Light of Electronic Developments, October 24-25, 2002, Bolu, Turkey. Retrieved, March 26, 2008, from http://www.library.yale.edu/~llicense/TRNSL-paper.doc

LINDLEY, J.A. (2003). Turkish National Site License (TRNSL). Serials, 16(2): 187-190.

ERDOĞAN, P.L., & KARASÖZEN, B. (2006). ANKOS and its dealings with vendors. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(3-4): 69-83, p. 69.

KARASÖZEN, B., & LINDLEY, J.A. (2004). The impact of ANKOS: Consortium development in Turkey. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30: 402-409.

See the ANKOS web site for more information (http://www.ankos.gen.tr).

TONTA, Y. (2007). Elektronik dergiler ve veri tabanlarında ulusal lisans sorunu (The national license issue in electronic journals and databases). (conference paper). Presented at the Akademik Bilişim ’07, 31 January – 2 February 2007, Kütahya, Turkey. (Online). Retrieved, May 12, 2008, from http://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~tonta/yayinlar/tonta-ab07-bildirisi.pdf.

For more information on EKUAL, see http://www.ulakbim.gov.tr/cabim/ekual/hakkinda.uhtml.

In fact, ULAKBİM paid for the license fee of 2006 (last year of a three-year license agreement signed by Elsevier and ANKOS) on behalf of ANKOS members.

For more information on databases offered through ULAKBİM’s EKUAL, see http://www.ulakbim.gov.tr/cabim/ekual/veritabani.uhtml.

ÜNAK-OCLC KONSORSİYUMU (The ÜNAK-OCLC Consortium). (2008). Retrieved, 26 March 2008, from http://www.unak.org.tr/unakoclc/

See http://e-gazete.anadolu.edu.tr/ayrinti.php?no=6501.

FRAZIER, K. (2001). The librarians' dilemma: Contemplating the costs of the "big deal". D-Lib Magazine, 7(3). (Online). Retrieved, May 12, 2008, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march01/frazier/03frazier.html

BALL, D. (2004). What’s the “big deal”, and why is it a bad deal for universities? Interlending & Document Supply, 32(2), 117-125.

JOHNSON, R.K. (2004). Open access: Unclocking the value of scientific research. Journal of Library Administration, 42(2), 107-124.

DURANCEAU, E.F. (2004). Cornell and the future of the big deal: An interview with Ross Atkinson. Serials Review, 30(2), 127-130, p. 127. See also Johnson (2004, p. 109) in Ref. 13.

GATTEN, J.N., & SANVILLE, T. (2004). An orderly retreat from the big deal: is it possible for consortia? D-Lib Magazine, 10(10). (Online). Retrieved, May 12, 2008, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october04/gatten/10gatten.html.

HAAR, J. (2000). Project PEAK: Vanderbilt’s experience with articles on demand. Serials Librarian, 38(1/2), 91-99.

HUNTER, K. (2000). PEAK and Elsevier Science. PEAK Conference, Ann Arbor, 23 March 2000. (Online). Retrieved, May 12, 2008, from http://www.si.umich.edu/PEAK-2000/hunter.pdf

DAVIS, P.M. (2002). Patterns in electronic journal usage: Challenging the composition of geographic consortia. College & Research Libraries, 63, 484-497.

GALBRAITH, B. (2002). Journal retention decisions incorporating use-statistics as a measure of value. Collection Management, 27(1), 79-90.

BATI, H. (2006). Elektronik bilgi kaynaklarında maliyet-yarar analizi: Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Kütüphanesi üzerinde bir değerlendirme. (Cost-benefit analysis in electronic information resources: An evaluation of the Middle East Technical University Library). Unpublished M.A. dissertation. Hacettepe University, Ankara.

CHRZASTOWSKI, T.E. (2003). Making the transition from print to electronic serial collections: A new model for academic chemistry libraries? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 1141-1148.

WILEY, L., & CHRZASTOWSKI, T.E. (2002). The Illinois Interlibrary Loan Assesment Project II: revisiting statewide article sharing and assessing the impact of electronic full-text journals. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 26(1), 19-33.

HAMAKER, C. (2003). Quantity, quality and the role of consortia. What’s the Big Deal? Journal purchasing – bulk buying or cherry picking? Strategic issues for librarians, publishers, agents and intermediaries. Association of Subscription Agents and Intermediaries (ASA) Conference (24-25 February 2003). (Online). Retrieved, 14 January 2007, from http://www.subscriptionagents.org/conference/200302/chuck.hamaker.pps.

KE, H-R., KWAKKELAAR, R., TAI, Y-M., & CHEN, L-C. (2002). Exploring behavior of E-journal users in science and technology: Transaction log analysis of Elsevier’s ScienceDirect OnSite in Taiwan. Library & Information Science Research, 24, 265-291.

RUSCH-FEJA, D., & SIEBKY, U. (1999). Evaluation of usage and acceptance of electronic journals: Results of an electronic survey of Max Planck society researchers including usage statistics from Elsevier, Springer and Academic Press (Full report). D-Lib Magazine, 5(10). (Online). Retrieved, May 12, 2008, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october99/rusch-feja/10rusch-feja-fullreport.html.

VAUGHAN, K.T.L. (2003). Changing use patterns of print journals in the digital age: Impacts of electronic equivalents on print chemistry journal use. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 1149-1152.

See also TONTA, Y., & ÜNAL, Y. (2007). Dergi kullanım verilerinin bibliyometrik analizi ve koleksiyon yönetiminde kullanımı (Bibliometric analysis of journal use data and its use in collection management). In Serap Kurbanoğlu, Yaşar Tonta & Umut Al (eds.). Değişen Dünyada Bilgi Yönetimi Sempozyumu 24-26 Ekim 2007, Ankara Bildiriler (pp. 193-200). Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Bilgi ve Belge Yönetimi Bölümü.

AL, U., & TONTA, Y. (2007). Tam metin makale kullanım verilerinin bibliyometrik analizi (Bibliometric analysis of the full-text aricle use). In Serap Kurbanoğlu, Yaşar Tonta & Umut Al (eds.). Değişen Dünyada Bilgi Yönetimi Sempozyumu 24-26 Ekim 2007, Ankara Bildiriler (pp. 209-217). Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Bilgi ve Belge Yönetimi Bölümü.

EVANS, P., & PETERS, J. (2005). Analysis of the dispersal of use for journals in Emerald Management Xtra (EMX). Interlending & Document Supply, 33(3): 155-157.

URBANO, C., ANGLADA, L.M., BORREGO, A., CANTOS, C., COSCULLUELA, C., & COMELLAS, N. (2004). The use of consortially purchased electronic journals by the CBUC (2000-2003). D-Lib Magazine, 10(6). (Online). Retrieved. May 10, 2008, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/anglada/06anglada.html.

COOPER, M.D., & MCGREGOR, G.F. (1994). Using article photocopydata in bibliographic models for journal collection management. Library Quarterly, 64, 386-413.

MCDONALD, J.D. (2007). Understanding journal usage: A statistical analysis of citation and use. Journal of the AmericanSociety for Information Science and Technology, 58, 39-50.

TSAY, M-Y. (1998a). Library journal use and citation half-life in medical science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 1283-1292.

TSAY, M-Y. (1998b). The relationship between journal use in a medical library and citation use. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 86, 31-39.

WULFF, J.L., & NIXON, N.D. (2004). Quality markers and use ofelectronic journals in an academic health sciences library. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 92, 315-322.

SCALES, P.A. (1976). Citation analyses as indicators of the use of serials: A comparison of ranked title lists produced by citation counting and from use data. Journal of Documentation, 32, 17-25.

TONTA, Y., & ÜNAL, Y. (2005). Scatter of journals and literature obsolescence reflected in document delivery requests. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 56(1): 84-94.

DARMONI, S.J., ROUSSEL, F., BENICHOU, J., THIRION, B., & PINHAS, N. (2002). Reading factor: A new bibliometric criterion for managing digital libraries. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 90(3), 323–327.

BOLLEN, J., VAN DE SOMPEL, H., SMITH, J., & LUCE, R. (2005). Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data. Information Processing & Management, 41(6), 1419–1440.

BOLLEN, J., & VAN DE SOMPEL, H. (2008). Usage Impact Factor: the effects of sample characteristics on usage-based impact metrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 136-149.

http://www.mesur.org/MESUR.html (bold in original)

http://www.info.sciencedirect.com/content/journals/titles/

The figure reflects the data obtained from the publisher. It is slightly different from the total given in Fig. 1, as the download statistics for the last quarter of 2007 was estimated and added to the total.

The average number of articles downloaded per journal title over 7 years was 11,991 (1,713 per year) (s.d. = 20,101, median: 4,784).

http://www.info.sciencedirect.com/news/archive/2006/news_billionth.asp

Note that the Journal of the American College of Cardiology ranks 8th on the basis of total use (2001/07). It does not appear in Table 3 because the journal was not common in the core journal lists of all years.

EGGHE, L., & ROUSSEAU, R. (1990). Introduction to informetrics: Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers. (Online) Retrieved. January 31, 2008 from http://hdl.handle.net/1942/587.

COLEMAN, S.R. (1994). Disciplinary variables that affect the shape of Bradford’s bibliograph. Scientometrics, 29(1): 59-81.

COLEMAN, S.R. (1993). Bradford distributions of social-science bibliographies varying in definitional homogeneity. Scientometrics, 27(1): 75-91.

DROTT, M.C., & GRIFFITH, B.C. (1978). An examination of the Bradford’s Law and the scattering of scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29, 238-246.

TRUESWELL, R.L. (1969). Some behavioral patterns of library users: the 80/20 rule. Wilson Library Bulletin, 43: 458-461.

See Ref. 34. Current statistics on the number of electronic journals and articles in the Emerald Management Xtra (EMX) collection come from http://info.emeraldinsight.com/products/xtra/index.htm?PHPSESSID=en8jddl2iumvt3ask2h0a98at6&.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS