Classificare il dominio della comunicazione secondo la teoria dei livelli di integrazione

Albrechtsen, H., Jacob, E. K. (1997). Classification Systems as Boundary Objects in Diverse Information Ecologies. In E. Efthimades (Ed.). Advances in Classification Research: Proceedings of the 5th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop. Medford, New Jersey: Information Today.

Austin, D. (1969). Prospects for a new general classification. Journal of librarianship, 1, 149-169.

Austin, D. (1976). The CRG research into a freely faceted scheme. In A. Maltby (Ed.), Classification in the 1970s: a second look (158-194). London: Bingley.

Beghtol, C. (1998). Knowledge domains: Multidisciplinarity and bibliographic classification systems. Knowledge organization, 25, n. 1-2, 1-12.

Binwall, J. C. (1992). Ranganathan and the Universe of Knowledge. International Classification, 19(4), 195-200.

Blitz, D. (1992). Emergent evolution: qualitative novelty and the levels of reality. Boston: Kluwer Publishers.

Broughton V. (2004). Una classificazione per il 21° secolo: principi e strutture della Classificazione bibliografica Bliss, traduzione di Claudio Gnoli. Roma: AIB <http://www.aib.it/aib/contr/broughton1.htm>.

Brown, R. (1986). Social psychology. London: Collier Macmillan.

Caprio, L., Ghiglione B. (2003). Information Architecture. Milano: Tecniche Nuove.

Cicovacki, P. (2001). New ways of ontology: the ways of interaction, «Axiomathes», 12, 159-170: 160. Cit. in Scognamiglio, C. (2003). La teoria ontologica di Nicolai Hartmann e la processualità del reale. <www.filosofia.it/pagine/ebook/Hartmann.pdf>.130

Coates, E., Lloyd, G., Simandl, D. (1979). The BSO manual: the development, rationale and use of the Broad System of Ordering. The Hague, Fédération Internationale de Documentation. Estratti da <http://www.ucl.ac.uk/fatks/bso>.

Cowan, J.W. (1997). The complete Lojban language. Fairfax (Virginia): The Logical Language Group. <http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=The+Lojban+Reference+Grammar&bl>.

Dal Porto, S., Marchitelli, A. (2006). Functionality and flexibility of traditional classification schemes applied to a Content Management System (CMS): facets, DDC, JITA. Knowledge organization, 33, 1, 35-44.

Denton, W. (2003). Putting Facets on the Web: An Annotated Bibliography. <http://www.miskatonic.org/library/facet-biblio.html>.

Denton, W. (2003). How to Make a Faceted Classification and Put It On the Web. <http://www.miskatonic.org/library/facet-web-howto.html>.

Farradane, J.E. (1961). Fundamental fallacies and new needs in classification. In D.J. Foskett & B.I. Palmer (Eds.), The Sayers memorial volume (120-135). London: Library Association.

Feibleman, J.K. (1954). Theory of Integrative Levels. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 5, 17, 59-66

Foskett, D.J. (1961). Classification and integrative levels. In D.J. Foskett & B.I. Palmer (Eds.), The Sayers memorial volume (pp. 136-150). London: Library Association. Republished in Chan, L.M., Richmond, P.A. & Svenonius, E. (Eds.), Theory of subject analysis: A sourcebook (pp. 210-220). Littleton (Col.): Libraries Unlimited, 1985.

Foskett, D.J. (1970). Classification for a general index language: A review of recent research by the Classification Research Group. London: Library Association.

Foskett D.J., Foskett, J. (1974). The London Education Classification: a thesaurus/classification of British educational terms. London: University of London, Institute of Education Library.

Gardin, J.C. (1965). Free classifications and faceted classifications: their exploitation with computers, in Classification research. Proceedings International conference on classification research. Elsinore (Denmark) 1964, Pauline Atherton ed. Copenhagen : Munksgaard, 161-176.131

Gatto, E. (2004). A righe o a quadretti? [resoconto] Le dimensioni dell’informazione. Giornata di studio AIB Piemonte-ISKO Italia. Torino. Biblioteca civica Geisser: 12 giugno 2004. <http://www.iskoi.org/doc/dimensioni4.htm>.

Giangualano, M. (2006). Compendio di teoria della comunicazione. <http://www.tecnolab.tm/saggi/comunicazione/>.

Gnoli, C. (2000). Il tavolino di Ranganathan. Bologna: Bibliotime, 3. <http://didattica.spbo.unibo.it/bibliotime/num-iii-3/gnoli.htm>.

Gnoli, C. (2002). Indicizzazione semantica nell’era digitale. <http://www.burioni.it/forum/gnoli-sem.htm>

Gnoli, C. (2004). Classificazione a faccette. Roma: Associazione italiana biblioteche.

Gnoli, C. (2005). BC2 classes for phenomena: An application of the theory of integrative levels. The Bliss classification bulletin, 47, 17-21. Presente anche in DLIST <http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/920/>.

Gnoli, C., Poli, R. (2004). Levels of reality and levels of representation. Knowledge organization, 31, 3, 151-160.

Gnoli, C., Merli, G. (2005). Notazione e interfaccia di ricerca per una classificazione a livelli. AIDA informazioni, 23, 1-2, 57-72. <http://www.aidainformazioni.it/2005/122005.html#articoli>.

Gnoli, C., Hong M. (2006). Freely faceted classification for Web-based information retrieval. New Review in Hypermedia and Multimedia, 12, 1, 63-81.

Gnoli, C., Marino, V., Rosati, L. (2006). Organizzare la conoscenza. Dalle biblioteche all’architettura dell’informazione per il Web. Milano: Tecniche Nuove.

Gnoli, C., Cesanelli, E. (2007). Levels of reality. [resoconto] workshop, Bolzano, 26-28 September 2007. <http://www.iskoi.org/ilc/razor.htm>.

Graig, R.T. (1999). Communication Theory As A Field. Communication Theory, 9, 2, 199-161.

Graig, R.T. (1999). Table 1. Seven Traditions of Communication Theory. <http://www.colorado.edu/communication/meta-discourses/Bibliography/Craig%20(1999)/tables.html>.

Graig, R.T., Muller, H. L. (2007). Theorizing Communication. Readings Across Traditions. Sage Publications.132

Hartmann, N. (1952). New ways of ontology. Westport: Greenwood Press.

Hjørland, B., Albrechsten H. (1999). An Analysis of Some Trends in Classification Research. Knowledge Organization, 26, 3, 131-139.

ISKO Italia (2004). Integrative level classification. Research project. <http://www.iskoi.org/ilc>.

ISKO Italia (2007). The León manifesto. <http://www.iskoi.org/ilc/leon.htm>.

Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory and Practice. Detroit, Michigan: Wayne State Univ. Press.

Korzybski, A. (1933). Science and Sanity An Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General Semantics. Institute of General Semantics.

Kosko, B. (1995). Il Fuzzy-pensiero. Teoria e applicazioni della logica Fuzzy. Milano: Baldini & Castoldi.

Kyle, B. (1958). Towards a classification for social science literature. American documentation. 9, 168-183.

Kyle, B. (1959). An examination of some of the problems involved in drafting general classifications and some proposals for their solution. Review of documentation. 26, 1, 17-21.

La Barre, K. (2004). Adventures in faceted classification: A brave new world or a world of confusion? In I. McIlwaine (Ed.), Knowledge organization and the global society: Proceedings 8th international ISKO conference, London, July 13-16, 2004 (p. 79-84). Würzburg: Ergon.

La Barre, K., Dent C. (2002). Creating Conceptual Access: Faceted Knowledge Organization in the Unrev-II email archives http://www.lml.bas.bg/iccs2002/port/

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University Of Chicago Press.

Landow, G.P. (2000). L’ipertesto: tecnologie digitali e critica letteraria. Milano: Bruno Mondadori.

Littlejohn, S.W., Foss K.A. (2005). Theories of Human Communication. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing.133

Marino, V. (2004). Classificazioni per il Web: i vantaggi dell’adozione di schemi a faccette. AIB-WEB Contributi. <http://www.aib.it/aib/contr/marino1.htm>

Montecchi, G., Venuda F. (2002). Manuale di biblioteconomia. Milano: Editrice Bibliografica.

Mills, J., Broughton, V. (1977). Bliss bibliographic classification, 2nd ed. Introduction and auxiliary schedules. London; Boston: Butterworths.

Olson, H. (2007). Cultural Infrastructure: The Story of How Classification Came to Shape Our Lives. Presente in Dlist. < http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/2057/>

Ong, W.J. (1986). Oralità e Scrittura, le tecnologie della parola. A Calanchi, R Loretelli. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Parsons, J. (1996). On the Relevance of Classification Theory to Database Design. In R. Fidel et al. (Eds.). Advances in Classification Research Proceedings of the 5th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop. Medford, New Jersey: Information Today. 131-140.

Poli, R. (1998). Levels. Netherlands: Springer. Axiomathes 9, 1-2, 197-211.

Poli, R. (2000). Spazi di rappresentazione. In Categorie e modelli di conoscenza, 19-54. Milano: Franco Angeli.

Poli, R. (2001). The basic problem of the theory of levels of reality. Netherlands: Springer. Axiomathes n. 12, 3-4, 261-283.

Poli, R. (2007). Three obstructions: forms of causation, chronotopoids, and levels of reality. Netherlands: Springer. Axiomathes n. 17, 1, 1-18. <http://www.springerlink.com/content/9078522m1kv3q800/fulltext.pdf>

Quintarelli, E. (2005). Folksonomies: power to the people. Milano: incontro ISKO Italia UniMIB. <http://www.iskoi.org/doc/folksonomies.htm>.

Quintarelli, E., Resmini A., Rosati, L. (2007). Facetag: Integrating Bottom-up and Top-down. Classification in a Social Tagging System. <http://www.facetag.org/download/facetag-20070325.pdf>.

Ranganathan, S. R. (1967). Prolegomena to Library Classification. New York: Asia Publishing House. Disponibile anche in Dlist <http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/1151/>.134

Rosati, L. (2003). Per un accesso multidimensionale all’informazione o della classificazione a faccette. <http://iainstitute.org/it/articoli/000204.html>

Rosenfeld, L., Morville, P. (2002). Architettura dell’informazione per il World Wide Web. Milano: Hops Libri.

Sacco, G.M. (2002). Conventional Taxonomies vs. Dynamic Taxonomies. Torino: Dipartimento di Informatica, Università di Torino. <http://66.102.1.104/scholar?hl=it&lr=&q=cache:yc3gjclVW3sJ:www.di.unito.it/~sacco/sacco-dyntax.pdf+Conventional+taxonomies+vs,+Dynamic+Taxonomies>

Scognamiglio, C. (2003). La teoria ontologica di Nicolai Hartmann e la processualità del reale. Roma: Edizioni Filosofia.it. <http://www.filosofia.it/pagine/ebook/Hartmann.pdf>.

Scognamiglio, C. (2007). Ontologia e teoria dei sistemi: un contributo all’ingegneria del software. in Pianeta Galileo 2006, a cura di A. Peruzzi, Regione Toscana, 145-158.

Seibt, J. (2004). Process theories: Crossdisciplinary studies in dynamic categories. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Shirky, C. (2005). Ontology is Overrated: Categories, Links, and Tags. <http://shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html>.

Spiteri, L. (1995). The Classification Research Group and The Theory of Integrative Levels. The Katharine Sharp Review, 1, Summer 1995, 1-6. <http://web.archive.org/web/20011222083409/alexia.lis.uiuc.edu/review/summer1995/spiteri.html>

Spiteri, L. (1998). A Simplified Model for Facet Analysis, in Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science 23, 1-30. Toronto: Toronto Press University. <http://iainstitute.org/pg/a_simplified_model_for_facet_analysis.php>

Szostak, R. (2004). Classifying science: Phenomena, data, theory, method, practice. Berlin: Springer.

Universal Decimal Classification (2003). Pocket Edition. London: BSI.

Vickery, B. (1960). Faceted classification: A guide to construction and use of special schemes. London: Aslib.

Weinberger, D. (2007). Everything is miscellaneous. The power of the new digital disorder. New York: Time Books.