Attitudes toward Open Access, Open Peer Review, and Altmetrics among Contributors to Spanish Scholarly Journals

Xin Gu and Karen Blackmore, ‘Characterisation of Academic Journals in the Digital Age,’ Scientometrics 110, no. 3 (2017): 1333–50.

Chris R. Triggle and David J. Triggle, ‘From Gutenberg to Open Science: An Unfulfilled Odyssey,’ Drug Development Research 78, no. 1 (2017): 3–23.

Roger Clarke, ‘The Cost Profiles of Alternative Approaches to Journal Publishing,’ First Monday 12, no. 12 (2007), doi:10.5210/fm.v12i12.2048.

Jean-Claude Guédon, ‘The “Green” and “Gold” Roads to Open Access: The Case for Mixing and Matching,’ Serials Review 30, no. 4 (2004): 315–28.

Williams E. Nwagwu and Bosire Onyancha, ‘Back to the Beginning—the Journal Is Dead, Long Live Science,’ Journal of Academic Librarianship 41, no. 5 (2015): 669–79.

William B. Millard, ‘The Wisdom of Crowds, the Madness of Crowds: Rethinking Peer Review in the Web Era,’ Annals of Emergency Medicine 57, no. 1 (2011): A13–A20.

Tony Ross-Hellauer, ‘What Is Open Peer Review? A Systematic Review,’ F1000Research 6 (April 2017): 588, doi:10.12688/f1000research.11369.1.

Lovela Machala Poplašen and Ivana Hebrang Grgić, ‘Altmetric and Bibliometric Scores: Does Open Access Matter?,’ Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries 5, no. 2 (2017): 451–60.

Lars Moksness and Svein Ottar Olsen, ‘Understanding Researchers’ Intention to Publish in Open Access Journals,’ Journal of Documentation 73, no. 6 (2017): 1149–66; Christian Matt, Christian Hoerndlein, and Thomas Hess, ‘Let the Crowd Be My Peers? How Researchers Assess the Prospects of Social Peer Review,’ Electronic Markets 27, no. 2 (2017): 111–24.

Yimei Zhu, ‘Who Support Open Access Publishing? Gender, Discipline, Seniority and Other Factors Associated with Academics’ OA Practice,’ Scientometrics 111, no. 2 (May 6, 2017): 557–79; Joachim Schöpfel et al., ‘Ready for the Future? A Survey on Open Access with Scientists from the French National Research Center (CNRS),’ Interlending & Document Supply 44, no. 4 (2016): 141–49; Sergio Ruiz-Pérez and Emilio Delgado-López-Cózar, ‘Spanish Researchers’ Opinions, Attitudes and Practices towards Open Access Publishing,’ El Profesional de La Información 26, no. 4 (August 2017): 722, doi:10.3145/epi.2017.jul.16.

Jennifer Rowley et al., ‘Academics’ Behaviors and Attitudes towards Open Access Publishing in Scholarly Journals,’ Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 68, no. 5 (2017): 1201–11.

Julia E. Rodriguez, ‘Awareness and Attitudes about Open Access Publishing: A Glance at Generational Differences,’ Journal of Academic Librarianship 40, no. 6 (2014): 604–10.

Aspasia Togia and Stella Korobili, ‘Attitudes towards Open Access: A Meta-synthesis of the Empirical Literature,’ Information Services & Use 34 (2014): 221–31.

Ruiz-Pérez and Delgado-López-Cózar, ‘Spanish Researchers’ Opinions, Attitudes and Practices towards Open Access Publishing.’

Wilhelm Peekhaus and Nicholas Proferes, ‘How Library and Information Science Faculty Perceive and Engage with Open Access,’ Journal of Information Science 41, no. 5 (2015): 640–61.

Zhu, ‘Who Support Open Access Publishing?’

Schöpfel et al., ‘Ready for the Future?’

Rowley et al., ‘Academics’ Behaviors and Attitudes towards Open Access Publishing.’

Rodriguez, ‘Awareness and Attitudes about Open Access Publishing’; Paola Bongiovani, Sandra Miguel, and Tony Hernández-Pérez, ‘Actitudes Y Percepciones de Los Evaluadores de La Carrera Científica En Argentina Sobre La Publicación En Acceso Abierto,’ Revista Española de Documentación Científica 40, no. 2 (June 2017): e171, doi:10.3989/redc.2017.2.1404; Zhu, ‘Who Support Open Access Publishing?’

Peekhaus and Proferes, ‘How Library and Information Science Faculty Perceive and Engage with Open Access’; Carol Tenopir et al., ‘Imagining a Gold Open Access Future: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Funding Scenarios among Authors of Academic Scholarship,’ College & Research Libraries 78, no. 6 (August 2017): 824, doi:10.5860/crl.78.6.824; Zhu, ‘Who Support Open Access Publishing?’; Matt, Hoerndlein, and Hess, ‘Let the Crowd Be My Peers?’

Francisco Segado-Boj, María Ángeles Chaparro-Domínguez, and Cristina Castillo-Rodríguez, ‘Use of Twitter among Spanish Communication-Area Faculty: Research, Teaching and Visibility,’ First Monday 20, no. 6 (May 2015), doi:10.5210/fm.v20i6.5602.

Schöpfel et al., ‘Ready for the Future?’; Zhu, ‘Who Support Open Access Publishing?’

Jihyang Choi, ‘Why Do People Use News Differently on SNSs? An Investigation of the Role of Motivations, Media Repertoires, and Technology Cluster on Citizens’ News-Related Activities,’ Computers in Human Behavior 54 (2016): 249–56.

Nicole B. Ellison, Charles Steinfield, and Cliff Lampe, ‘The Benefits of Facebook ‘Friends’: Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites,’ Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12, no. 4 (2007): 1143–68.

Francisco Segado-Boj, Juan Martín-Quevedo, and Juan-José Prieto-Gutiérrez, ‘Percepción de Las Revistas Científicas Españolas Hacia El Acceso Abierto, Open Peer Review y Altmetrics,’ Ibersid 12, no. 1 (2018): in press.

Segado-Boj, Martín-Quevedo & Prieto-Gutiérrez, ‘Percepción de Las Revistas Científicas Españolas Hacia El Acceso Abierto, Open Peer Review y Altmetrics.’

Ruiz-Pérez and Delgado-López-Cózar, ‘Spanish Researchers’ Opinions, Attitudes and Practices towards Open Access Publishing.’

Peekhaus and Proferes, ‘How Library and Information Science Faculty Perceive and Engage with Open Access.’

Candela Ollé Castellà, Alexandre López-Borrull, and Ernest Abadal, ‘The Challenges Facing Library and Information Science Journals: Editors’ Opinions,’ Learned Publishing 29 (2016): 89-94.

Ruiz-Pérez and Delgado-López-Cózar, ‘Spanish Researchers’ Opinions, Attitudes and Practices towards Open Access Publishing’; Schöpfel et al., ‘Ready for the Future?’; Zhu, ‘Who Support Open Access Publishing?’; Togia and Korobili, ‘Attitudes towards Open Access.’

Ollé Castellà, López-Borrull, and Abadal, ‘The Challenges Facing Library and Information Science Journals.’

Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo et al., ‘Peer Review: The Experience and Views of Early Career Researchers,’ Learned Publishing 30, no. 4 (2017): 269–77.

R. Melero and F. López-Santoveña, ‘Referees’ Attitudes toward Open Peer Review and Electronic Transmission of Papers,’ Food Science and Technology International 7, no. 6 (2001): 521–27.

Hulya Dilek-Kayaoglu and M. Tayfun Gulle, ‘Peer Review Process in Turkey for Journals Regarding Social and Human Sciences: A Study from the Perspectives of Author, Peer Reviewer and Editor,’ Turkish Librarianship 29, no. 3 (2015): 391–432.

Hildrun Kretschmer and Theo Kretschmer, ‘Gender Bias and Explanation Models for the Phenomenon of Women’s Discriminations in Research Careers,’ Scientometrics 97, no. 1 (October 13, 2013): 25–36.

Matthias Potthoff and Fabian Zimmermann, ‘Is There a Gender-Based Fragmentation of Communication Science? An Investigation of the Reasons for the Apparent Gender Homophily in Citations,’ Scientometrics 112, no. 2 (2017): 1047–63.

Romy van der Lee and Naomi Ellemers, ‘Gender Contributes to Personal Research Funding Success in the Netherlands,’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112, no. 40 (2015): 12349–53.

Stephanie Sardelis and Joshua A. Drew, ‘Not “Pulling up the Ladder”: Women Who Organize Conference Symposia Provide Greater Opportunities for Women to Speak at Conservation Conferences,’ PLOS One 11, no. 7 (July 28, 2016): e0160015.

Kathleen Reed, Dana McFarland, and Rosie Croft, ‘Laying the Groundwork for a New Library Service: Scholar-Practitioner & Graduate Student Attitudes toward Altmetrics and the Curation of Online Profiles,’ Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 11, no. 2 (June 20, 2016): 87, doi:10.18438/B8J047; Tara Malone and Susan Burke, ‘Academic Librarians’ Knowledge of Bibliometrics and Altmetrics,’ Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 11, no. 3 (September 2016): 34, doi:10.18438/B85G9J.

Enrique Orduna-Malea et al., ‘Do ResearchGate Scores Create Ghost Academic Reputations?,’ Scientometrics 112, no. 1 (2017): 443–60.

Min-Chun Yu et al., ‘ResearchGate: An Effective Altmetric Indicator for Active Researchers?,’ Computers in Human Behavior 55 (2016): 1001–6.

Adrian Mulligan, Louise Hall, and Ellen Raphael, ‘Peer Review in a Changing World: An International Study Measuring the Attitudes of Researchers,’ Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64, no. 1 (2013): 132–61.

Björn Stockleben et al., ‘Towards a Framework for Creative Online Collaboration: A Research on Challenges and Context,’ Education and Information Technologies 22, no. 2 (2017): 575–97.