Scholarly reputation building in the digital age: an activity-specific approach. Review article

Herman, Eti and Nicholas, David Scholarly reputation building in the digital age: an activity-specific approach. Review article. El profesional de la información, 2019, vol. 28, n. 1. [Journal article (Unpaginated)]

[thumbnail of Review article]
Preview
 Text (Review article)
280102_Herman_Nicholas.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (638kB) | Preview

English abstract

Seeking to understand how today's scholars may, indeed should go about building, maintaining and showcasing their professional reputation, the literature review presented here explores the reputational opportunities available to them in the increasingly open-values based, digital and networked environment of Science 2.0. Using a conceptual framework developed with the help of the European Commission and specifically designed for conducting analytical reviews and audits of the reputational value of scholarly activities, this study, examines in some detail the practices –more than 30 of them- that comprise the present-day scientific undertaking from a reputation-accruing angle.

Item type: Journal article (Unpaginated)
Keywords: Scholarly reputation; Reputation building; Communication; Scholars; Careers; Profession; Professional activities; Literature review; Review article; Bibliography.
Subjects: C. Users, literacy and reading. > CZ. None of these, but in this section.
F. Management. > FB. Marketing.
F. Management. > FD. Public relations.
G. Industry, profession and education. > GG. Curricula aspects.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HT. Web 2.0, Social networks
Depositing user: Tomàs Baiget
Date deposited: 19 Jan 2019 13:28
Last modified: 19 Jan 2019 13:43
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/33890

References

Abramo, Giovanni; D'Angelo, Ciriaco-Andrea; Di-Costa, Flavia (2009). “Research collaboration and productivity: Is there correlation?”. Higher education, v. 57, n. 2, pp. 155-171.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9139-z

Abramo, Giovanni; D'Angelo, Ciriaco-Andrea; Di-Costa, Flavia (2010). “Testing the trade‐off between productivity and quality in research activities”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 61, n. 1, pp. 132-140.

https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.01815

https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21254

Abramo, Giovanni; D'Angelo, Ciriaco-Andrea; Murgia, Gianluca (2014). “Variation in research collaboration patterns across academic ranks”. Scientometrics, v. 98, n. 3, pp. 2275-2294.

https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.13352

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1185-3

Academia.edu (2018). About.

http://www.academia.edu/about

Adams, James D.; Black, Grant C.; Clemmons, J. Roger; Stephan, Paula E. (2005). “Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981-1999”. Research policy, v. 34, n. 3, pp. 259-285.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.014

Agarwal, Ashok; Durairajanayagam, Damayanthi; Tatagari, Sindhuja; Esteves, Sandro D.; Harlev, Avi; Henkel, Ralf; Roychoudhury, Shubhadeep; Homa, Sheryl; Garrido-Puchalt, Nicolás; Ramasamy, Ranjith; Majzoub, Ahmad; Dao-Ly, Kim; Tvrda, Eva; Assidi, Mourad; Kesari, Kavindra; Sharma, Reecha; Banihani, Saleem; Ko, Edmund; Abu-Elmagd, Muhammad; Gosálvez, Jaime; Bashiri, Asher (2016). “Bibliometrics: Tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics”. Asian journal of andrology, v.18, n. 2, pp. 296-309.

https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.171582

Åkerlind, Gerlese S. (2008). “An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: An integration of the literature”. Studies in higher education, v. 33, n. 1, pp. 17-31.

https://formamente.guideassociation.org/wp-content/uploads/2009_1_2_akerlind.pdf

https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701794775

Allen, Heidi G.; Stanton, Tasha R.; Di-Pietro, Flavia; Moseley, G. Lorimer (2013). "Social media release increases dissemination of original articles in the clinical pain sciences". PloS one, v. 8, n. 7, e68914.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068914

Alperin, Juan-Pablo; Fischman, Gustavo E.; McKiernan, Erin C.; Muñoz-Nieves, Carol; Niles, Meredith T.; Schimanski, Lesley (2018). “How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion, and tenure documents?”. Humanities commons [preprint].

https://doi.org/10.17613/M6W950N35

Altbach, Philip G.; Reisberg, Liz; Rumbley, Laura E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. A report prepared for the Unesco 2009 World conference on higher education. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College Center for International Higher Education.

http://www.cep.edu.rs/public/Altbach,_Reisberg,_Rumbley_Tracking_an_Academic_Revolution,_UNESCO_2009.pdf

Andersen, Heine (2000). “Influence and reputation in the social sciences – how much do researchers agree?”. Journal of documentation, v. 56, n. 6, pp. 674-692.

https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007132

Anderson, Terry (2016). “Theories for learning with emerging technologies”. In: Veletsianos, George (ed.). Emergence and innovation in digital learning: Foundations and applications. Edmonton: Athabasca University Press, pp. 35-50. ISBN: 978 1 771991490

https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781771991490.01

Anderson, Derrick M.; Slade, Catherine P. (2016). “Managing institutional research advancement: Implications from a university faculty time allocation study”. Research in higher education, v. 57, n. 1, pp. 99-121.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9376-9

Aung, Htet-Htet; Erdt, Mojisola; Theng, Yin-Leng (2017). “Awareness and usage of altmetrics: A user survey”. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 54, n. 1, pp. 18-26.

https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401003

Auranen, Otto; Nieminen, Mika (2010). “University research funding and publication performance — An international comparison”. Research policy, v. 39, n. 6, pp. 822-834.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.003

Barbour, Kim; Marshall, David (2012). “The academic online: Constructing persona through the World Wide Web”. First Monday, v. 17, n. 9.

https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v0i0.3969

Bauerlein, Mark; Gad-el-Hak, Mohamed; Grody, Wayne; McKelvey, Bill; Trimble, Stanley W. (2010). “We must stop the avalanche of low-quality research”. The chronicle of higher education, June 13.

http://chronicle.com/article/We-Must-Stop-the-Avalanche-of/65890

Bazeley, Pat (2010). “Conceptualising research performance”. Studies in higher education, v. 35, n. 8, pp. 889-903.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903348404

Beaver, Donald (2004). “Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority?”. Scientometrics, v. 60, n. 3, pp. 399-408.

https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034382.85360.cd

Beaver, Donald DeB; Rosen, Richard (1978). “Studies in scientific collaboration. Part I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship”. Scientometrics, v. 1, n. 1, pp. 65-84.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016840

Becher, Tony (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Stony Stratford: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press. ISBN: 978 0 335092215

Becher, Tony; Trowler Paul (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Second ed. Buckingham, UK: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press. ISBN: 978 0 335206278

https://www.mheducation.co.uk/openup/chapters/0335206271.pdf

Benavent-Pérez, María; Gorraiz, Juan; Gumpenberger, Christian; De-Moya-Anegón, Félix (2012). “The different flavors of research collaboration: A case study of their influence on university excellence in four world regions”. Scientometrics, v. 93, n. 1, pp. 41-58.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0638-4

Bikard, Michaël; Murray, Fiona; Gans, Joshua S. (2015). “Exploring trade-offs in the organization of scientific work: Collaboration and scientific reward”. Management science, v. 61, n. 7, pp. 1473-1495.

https://www.nber.org/papers/w18958

https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2052

Blackmore, Paul (2016a). Prestige in academic life: Excellence and exclusion. New York: Routledge. ISBN: 978 1 138884944

Blackmore, Paul (2016b). “Why research trumps teaching and what can be done about it”. In: Blackmore, Paul; Blackwell, Richard; Edmondson, Martin (eds.). Tackling wicked issues: Prestige and employment outcomes in the teaching excellence framework. Oxford: Higher Education Policy Institute.

https://www.hepi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Hepi_TTWI-Web.pdf

Blackmore, Paul (2018). “What can policy-makers do with the idea of prestige, to make better policy?”. Policy reviews in higher education, v. 2, n, 2, pp. 227-254.

https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2018.1498300

Blackmore, Paul; Kandiko, Camille B. (2011). “Motivation in academic life: A prestige economy”. Research in post-compulsory education, v. 16, n. 4, pp. 399-411.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2011.626971

Bloch, Carter; Graversen, Ebbe-Krogh; Pedersen, Heide-Skovgaard (2014). “Competitive research grants and their impact on career performance”. Minerva, v. 52, n. 1, pp. 77-96.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-014-9247-0

Bonney, Rick; Ballard, Heidi; Jordan, Rebecca; McCallie, Ellen; Phillips, Tina; Shirk, Jennifer; Wilderman, Candie C. (2009). Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. A Caise Inquiry Group Report.

http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519688.pdf

Borchardt, Rachel; Moran, Cullen; Cantrill, Stuart; Chemjobber; Oh, See-Arr; Hartings, Matthew R. (2018). “Perception of the importance of chemistry research papers and comparison to citation rates”. PloS one, v. 13, n. 3, e0194903.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194903

Bordons, María; Gómez-Caridad, Isabel; Fernández-Bajón, María-Teresa; Zulueta, María-Ángeles; Méndez, Aida (1996). “Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research”. Scientometrics, v. 37, n. 2, pp. 279-295.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02093625

Bornmann, Lutz (2011). “Scientific peer review”. Annual review of information science and technology, v. 45, n. 1, pp. 197-245.

https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2011.1440450112

Bornmann, Lutz (2014). Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics. Journal of Informetrics, v. 8, n. 4, pp. 895-903.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005

Bornmann, Lutz; Daniel, Hans-Dieter (2008). “What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior”. Journal of documentation, v. 64, n. 1, pp. 45-80.

https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844150

Borrego, Ángel; Anglada, Lluís (2016). “Faculty information behaviour in the electronic environment: Attitudes towards searching, publishing and libraries”. New library world, v. 117, n. 3/4, pp. 173-185.

https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-11-2015-0089

Bourne, Philip E.; Barbour, Virginia (2011). "Ten simple rules for building and maintaining a scientific reputation". PLoS comput biol., v. 7, n. 6, e1002108.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002108

Boyer, Ernest L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. A special report. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 0787940690

http://www.hadinur.com/paper/BoyerScholarshipReconsidered.pdf

Boyer, Patricia; Cockriel, Irv (1998). “Factors influencing grant writing: Perceptions of tenured and nontenured faculty”. SRA Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, v. 29, n. 3-4, pp. 61-68.

https://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A53643801/AONE?u=googlescholar&sid=AONE&xid=f759dff6

Boyer, Patricia; Cockriel, Irv (2001). “Grant performance of junior faculty across disciplines: Motivators and barriers”. Journal of research administration, v. 2, n. 1, pp. 19-23.

http://go.galegroup.com/ps/anonymous?id=GALE%7CA80350493&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=15391590&p=AONE&sw=w

Braxton, John M.; Luckey, William; Helland, Patricia (2002). Institutionalizing a broader view of scholarship through Boyer's four domains. Ashe-Eric higher education report. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 0787958417

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED468779.pdf

Breschi, Stefano; Cusmano, Lucia (2004). “Unveiling the texture of a European research area: Emergence of oligarchic networks under EU framework programmes”. International journal of technology management, v. 27, n. 28, pp. 747-772.

https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2004.004992

Brew, Angela (2001). “Conceptions of research: A phenomenographic study”. Studies in higher education, v. 26, n. 3, pp. 271-285.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120076255

Brew, Angela (2012). “Teaching and research: New relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education”. Higher education research & development, v. 31, n. 1, pp. 101-114.

https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.642844

Brewer, Dominic J.; Gates, Susan M.; Goldman, Charles A. (2001). In pursuit of prestige: Strategy and competition in U.S. higher education. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

https://www.rand.org/pubs/drafts/DRU2541.html

Bukvova, Helena (2010). “Studying research collaboration: A literature review”. Working papers on information systems, v. 10, n. 3. Sprouts.

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1126/d981037d4a640ac92b3b7e81fe4111f26a6a.pdf

Carayol, Nicolas; Thi, Thuc-Uyen-Nguyen (2005). “Why do academic scientists engage in interdisciplinary research?”. Research evaluation, v. 14, n. 1, pp. 70-79.

http://carayol.u-bordeaux4.fr/interdisciplinarity.pdf

https://doi.org/10.3152/147154405781776355

Casadevall, Arturo; Fang, Ferric C. (2012). “Reforming science: Methodological and cultural reforms”. Infection and immunity, v. 80, n. 3, pp. 891-896.

https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.06183-11

Chikoore, Lesley; Probets, Steve; Fry, Jenny; Creaser, Claire (2016). “How are UK academics engaging the public with their research? A cross‐disciplinary perspective”. Higher education quarterly, v. 70, n. 2, pp. 145-169.

https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12088

Ciber Research (2018). Harbingers: Third year interim results.

http://ciber-research.eu/download/20180630-Harbingers_year3_interim_report-early.pdf

Clark, Burton (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford, MA: Pergamon Press. ISBN: 978 0 080433547

Colquhoun, David (2011). “Publish or perish: Peer review and the corruption of science”. The guardian, 5 September.

http://www.theguardian.com/science/2011/sep/05/publish-perish-peer-review-science

Conole, Gráinne; Scanlon, Eileen; Mundin, Paul; Farrow, Robert (2010). Interdisciplinary research - Findings from the technology enhanced learning research programme. TLRP, UK.

http://oro.open.ac.uk/35300/1/TELInterdisciplinarity.pdf

Copiello, Sergio; Bonifaci, Pietro (2018). “A few remarks on ResearchGate score and academic reputation”. Scientometrics, v. 114, n. 1, pp. 301-306.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2582-9

Corley, Elizabeth A.; Boardman, P. Craig; Bozeman, Barry (2006). “Design and the management of multi-institutional research collaborations: Theoretical implications from two case studies”. Research policy, v. 35, n. 7, pp. 975-993.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.003

Couros, Alec; Hildebrandt, Katia (2016). “Designing for open and social learning”. In: Veletsianos, George (ed.). Emergence and innovation in digital learning: Foundations and applications. Edmonton: Athabasca University Press, pp. 143-161. ISBN: 978 1 771991490

https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781771991490.01

Cronin, Blaise (2013). “Metrics à la mode”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 64, n. 6, pp. 1091.

https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22989

Cronin, Blaise; Shaw, Debora; La-Barre, Kathryn (2003). “A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 54, n. 9, pp. 855-871.

https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10278

Cronin, Catherine (2017). “Openness and praxis: Exploring the use of open educational practices in higher education”. The international review of research in open and distributed learning, v. 18, n. 5.

https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096

Cronin, Catherine; MacLaren, Iain (2018). "Conceptualising OEP: A review of theoretical and empirical literature in Open Educational Practices". Open praxis, v. 10, n. 2, pp. 127-143. Open Education Global Conference Selected Papers.

https://www.learntechlib.org/p/183580

Crow, Robert; Cruz, Laura; Ellern, Jill; Ford, George; Moss, Hollye; White, Barbara-Jo (2018). “Boyer in the middle: Second generation challenges to emerging scholarship”. Innovative higher education, v. 43, n. 2, pp. 107-123.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-017-9409-8

Daniel, John (2012). “Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility”. Journal of interactive media in education, v. 2012, n. 3, art. 18.

https://doi.org/10.5334/2012-18

David, Paul A.; Den-Besten, Matthijs; Schroeder, Ralph (2010). “Will e-science be open science?”. In: Dutton, William; Jeffreys, Paul (eds.). World wide research: Reshaping the sciences and humanities in the century of information. Siepr Discussion paper N. 08-10. Stanford, CA: Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Stanford University.

http://siepr.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/08-10_1.pdf

Delanty, Gerard (1998). “The idea of the university in the global era: from knowledge as an end to the end of knowledge?”. Social epistemology, v. 12, n. 1, pp. 3-25.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02691729808578856

De-Rond, Mark; Miller, Alan N. (2005). “Publish or perish: Bane or boon of academic life?”. Journal of management inquiry, v. 14, n. 4, pp. 321-329.

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a640/8c13c67ccb4319e8bf61e83460669381f64a.pdf

https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492605276850

De-Solla-Price, Derek; Beaver, Donald (1966). “Collaboration in an invisible college”. American psychologist, v. 21, v. 11, pp. 1011-1018.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/17263883_Collaboration_in_an_Invisible_College

https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024051

Defazio, Daniela; Lockett, Andy; Wright, Mike (2009). “Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program”. Research policy, v, 38, n. 2, pp. 293-305.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.008

Dermentzi, Eleni; Papagiannidis, Savvas; Osorio-Toro, Carlos; Yannopoulou, Natalia (2016). “Academic engagement: Differences between intention to adopt social networking sites and other online technologies”. Computers in human behavior, v. 61, pp. 321-332.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.019

Desrochers, Nadine; Paul-Hus, Adèle; Haustein, Stefanie; Costas, Rodrigo; Mongeon, Philippe; Quan-Haase, Anabel; Bowman, Timothy D.; Pecoskie, Jen; Tsou, Andrew; Larivière, Vincent (2018). “Authorship, citations, acknowledgments and visibility in social media: Symbolic capital in the multifaceted reward system of science”. Social science information, v. 57, n. 2, pp. 223-248.

https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0539018417752089

Dewett, Todd; Denisi, Angelo S. (2004). “Exploring scholarly reputation: It's more than just productivity”. Scientometrics, v. 60, n. 2, pp. 249-272.

https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000027796.55585.6

Donelan, Helen (2016). “Social media for professional development and networking opportunities in academia”. Journal of further and higher education, v. 40, n. 5, pp. 706-729.

http://oro.open.ac.uk/42255/

https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2015.10143

Duffy, Brooke-Erin; Pooley, Jefferson D. (2017). “‘Facebook for academics’: The convergence of self-branding and social media logic on Academia.edu”. Social media + society, v. 3, n. 1.

https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117696523

Dunwoody, Sharon; Ryan, Michael (1985). “Scientific barriers to the popularization of science in the mass media”. Journal of communication, v. 35, n. 1, pp. 26-42.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb01882.x

Ecklund, Elaine H.; James, Sarah A.; Lincoln, Anne E. (2012). How academic biologists and physicists view science outreach. PloS one, v. 7, n. 5, e36240.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036240

Egghe, Leo; Bornmann, Lutz (2013). “Fallout and miss in journal peer review”. Journal of documentation, v. 69, n. 3, pp. 411-416.

https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-12-2011-0053

Erdt, Mojisola; Nagarajan, Aarthy; Sin, Sei-Ching-Joanna; Theng, Yin-Leng (2016). “Altmetrics: An analysis of the state-of-the-art in measuring research impact on social media”. Scientometrics, v. 109, n. 2, pp. 1117-1166.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2077-0

Etzkowitz, Henry; Leydesdorff, Loet (2000). “The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations”. Research policy, v. 29, n. 2, pp. 109-123.

http://www.oni.uerj.br/media/downloads/1-s2.0-S0048733399000554-main.pdf

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4

European Commission (2013). Opening up education: Innovative teaching and learning for all through new technologies and open educational resources. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52013DC0654&from=EN

European Commission (2014). Public consultation 'science 2.0’: Science in transition. Directorates-General for Research and Innovation (RTD) and Communications Networks, Content and Technology (Connect). Background document.

http://ec.europa.eu/research/consultations/science-2.0/background.pdf

European Parliament (2012). Modernising Europe's higher education systems. European Parliament resolution of 20 April 2012 on modernising Europe's higher education systems (2011/2294(INI).

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52012IP0139&rid=7

Fanelli, Daniele; Larivière, Vincent (2016). “Researchers’ individual publication rate has not increased in a century”. PloS one, v. 11, n. 3, e0149504.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149504

Franck, Georg (1999). “Scientific communication. A vanity fair?”. Science, v. 286, n. 5437, pp. 53-55.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5437.53

Freeman, Richard B.; Ganguli, Ina; Murciano-Goroff, Raviv (2014). Why and wherefore of increased scientific collaboration (Working paper no. w19819). National Bureau of Economic Research.

http://www.nber.org/papers/w19819.pdf

French, Amanda (2017). “Contextualising excellence in higher education teaching: Understanding the policy landscape”. In: French, Amanda; O’Leary, Matt (eds.). Teaching excellence in higher education. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing, pp. 5-38. ISBN: 978 1 78714 762 1

Frost, Jetta; Brockmann, Julia (2014). “When qualitative productivity is equated with quantitative productivity: Scholars caught in a performance paradox”. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, v. 17, n. 6, pp. 25-45.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-014-0572-8

Fyfe, Aileen; Coate, Kelly; Curry, Stephen; Lawson, Stuart; Moxham, Noah; Rostvik, Camila (2017). Untangling academic publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research. A briefing paper.

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.546100

Garnett, Fred; Ecclesfield, Nigel (2012). Towards a framework for co-creating open scholarship. Research in learning technology, v. 19.

https://journal.alt.ac.uk/index.php/rlt/article/view/724

Garvey, William D. (1975). “The dynamic scientific-information user”. In: Debons, Anthony; Cameron, William J. (eds). Perspectives in information science. NATO Advances study institutes series (Series E: Applied science), v. 10. Dordrecht: Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7759-7_32

Garvey, William D.; Griffith, Belver (1972). “Communication and information processing within scientific disciplines: Empirical findings for psychology”. Information storage and retrieval, v. 8, n. 3, pp. 123-136.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0271(72)90041-1

Gibbons, Michael; Limoges, Camille; Nowotny, Helga; Schwartzman, Simon; Scott, Peter; Trow, Martin (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage. ISBN: 0 8039 7794 8

Glänzel, Wolfgang; De-Lange, Cornelius (2002). “A distributional approach to multinationality measures of international scientific collaboration”. Scientometrics, v. 54, n. 1, pp. 75-89.

https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015684505035

Greenhow, Christine; Gleason, Benjamin (2014). “Social scholarship: Reconsidering scholarly practices in the age of social media”. British journal of educational technology, v. 45, n. 3, pp. 392-402.

https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12150

Greenhow, Christine; Gleason, Benjamin (2015). “The social scholar: Re-interpreting scholarship in the shifting university”. On the horizon, v. 23, n. 4, pp. 277-284.

https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-10-2014-0035

Gulbrandsen, Magnus; Kyvik, Svein (2010). “Are the concepts basic research, applied research and experimental development still useful? An empirical investigation among Norwegian academics”. Science and public policy, v. 37, n. 5, pp. 343-353.

https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X501171

Hagstrom, Warren O. (1964). “Anomy in scientific communities”. Social problems, v. 12, n. 2, pp. 186-195.

https://doi.org/10.2307/798981

Hagstrom, Warren O. (1974). “Competition in science”. American sociological review, v. 39, n. 1, pp. 1-18

https://doi.org/10.2307/2094272

Halevi, Gali; Schimming, Laura (2018). “An initiative to track sentiments in altmetrics”. Journal of altmetrics, v. 1, n. 1, p. 2.

https://doi.org/10.29024/joa.1

Hammarfelt, Björn; De-Rijcke, Sarah; Rushforth, Alexander D. (2016). “Quantified academic selves: The gamification of science through social networking services”. Information research, v. 21, n. 2, paper SM1.

http://www.informationr.net/ir/21-2/SM1.html

Harley, Diane; Acord, Sophia-Krzys; Earl-Novell, Sarah; Lawrence, Shannon; King, C. Judson (2010). Assessing the future landscape of scholarly communication: An exploration of faculty values and needs in seven disciplines. Berkeley: University of California Center for Studies in Higher Education. ISBN: 978 0 615 35834 5

https://escholarship.org/uc/item/15x7385g

Haustein, Stefanie (2016). “Grand challenges in altmetrics: Heterogeneity, data quality and dependencies”. Scientometrics, v. 108, n. 1, pp. 413-423.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1910-9

Haustein, Stefanie; Larivière, Vincent (2015). “The use of bibliometrics for assessing research: Possibilities, limitations and adverse effects”. In: Welpe, Isabell M.; Wollersheim, Juta; Ringelhan, Stefanie; Osterloh, Margit (eds). Incentives and performance. Cham: Springer, pp. 121-139. ISBN: 978 3 319 09785 5

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09785-5_8

Haustein, Stefanie; Peters, Isabella; Bar-Ilan, Judit; Priem, Jason; Shema, Hadas; Terliesner, Jens (2014). “Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community”. Scientometrics, v. 101, n. 2, pp. 1145-1163.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1221-3

Heap, Tania; Minocha, Shailey (2012). An empirically grounded framework to guide blogging for digital scholarship. Research in learning technology, v. 20 (Supp.), pp. 176-188.

https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.19195

Herman, Eti (2018). “Scholarly reputation”. FEMS microbiology letters, v. 365, n. 18, fny200.

https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fny200

Hoekman, Jarno; Scherngell, Thomas; Frenken, Koen; Tijssen, Robert (2012). “Acquisition of European research funds and its effect on international scientific collaboration”. Journal of economic geography, v. 13, n. 1, pp. 23-52.

https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs011

Hsieh, David (2013). Organization and role of international collaboration in research production. Doctoral dissertation. The University of Arizona.

http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/bitstream/10150/281178/1/Hsieh,+David.pdf

Irwin, Alan (2008). “Risk, science and public communication: Third-order thinking about scientific culture”. In: Bucchi, Massimiano; Trench, Brian (eds.). Handbook of public communication of science and technology. London, UK: Routledge, pp. 199-212. ISBN: 978 1 135049478

Jamali, Hamid R.; Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti (2016). “Scholarly reputation in the digital age and the role of emerging platforms and mechanisms”. Research evaluation, v. 25, n. 1, pp. 37-49.

https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv032

Jensen, Pablo; Rouquier, Jean-Baptiste; Kreimer, Pablo; Croissant, Yves (2008). “Scientists who engage with society perform better academically”. Science and public policy, v. 35, n. 7, pp. 527-541.

https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.4672

https://doi.org/10.3152/030234208X329130

Jordan, Katy (2017). Understanding the structure and role of academics’ ego-networks on social networking sites. PhD thesis. Milton Keynes: The Open University. http://oro.open.ac.uk/48259/1/PhDThesis_KLJ.pdf

Katz, J. Sylvan; Martin, Ben R. (1997). “What is research collaboration?”. Research policy, v. 26, n. 1, pp. 1-18.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1

Kekäle, Jouni (2003). “Academic leaders as thermostats”. Tertiary education & management, v. 9, n. 4, pp. 281-298.

https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025822504242

Kjellberg, Sara; Haider, Juta (2018). “Researchers’ online visibility: Tensions of visibility, trust and reputation”. Online information review.

https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-07-2017-0211

Kling, Rob; McKim, Geoffrey (1999). “Scholarly communication and the continuum of electronic publishing”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 50, n. 10, pp. 890-906.

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2c49/f1dca89d3258c919cbe20c2f6145ebf86982.pdf

https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:10<890::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-8

Kogan, Maurice (2007). “The academic profession and its interface with management”. In: Kogan, Maurice; Teichler, Ulrich (eds.). Key challenges to the academic profession. Paris and Kassel: Unesco Forum on Higher Education Research and Knowledge.

https://goo.gl/EiJWD4

Koryakina, Tatyana; Sarrico, Cláudia S.; Teixeira, Pedro N. (2015). “Universities’ third mission activities”. In: The transformation of university institutional and organizational boundaries. Rotterdam: SensePublishers, pp. 63-82. ISBN: 978 94 6300 178 6

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-178-6_4

Koseoglu, Suzan; Bozkurt, Aras (2018). “An exploratory literature review on open educational practices”. Distance education, pp. 1-21.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1520042

Landry, Réjean; Traore, Namatie; Godin, Benoît (1996). “An econometric analysis of the effect of collaboration on academic research productivity”. Higher education, v. 32, n. 3, pp. 283-301.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138868

Larivière, Vincent; Gingras, Yves (2010). “On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 61, n. 1, pp. 126-131.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/0908.1776.pdf

https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21226

Larivière, Vincent; Gingras, Yves; Sugimoto, Cassidy R.; Tsou, Andrew (2015). “Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 66, n. 7, pp. 323-1332.

https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23266

Lasthiotakis, Helen; Kretz, Andrew; Sá, Creso (2015). “Open science strategies in research policies: A comparative exploration of Canada, the US and the UK”. Policy futures in education, v. 13, n. 8, pp. 968-989.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210315579983

Latour, Bruno; Woolgar, Steve (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN: 978 0 691028323

Laudel, Grit (2005). “Is external research funding a valid indicator for research performance?”. Research evaluation, v. 14, n. 1, pp. 27-34.

https://doi.org/10.3152/147154405781776300

Leahey, Erin (2016). “From sole investigator to team scientist: Trends in the practice and study of research collaboration”. Annual review of sociology, v. 42, pp. 81-100.

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074219

Leahey, Erin; Beckman, Christine; Stanko, Taryn (2012). The impact of interdisciplinarity on scientists’ careers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Denver, CO.

http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/workshops/orgs-markets/past/pdf/LeaheySpring2013Impact.pdf

Lee, Sooho; Bozeman, Barry (2005). “The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity”. Social studies of science, v. 35, n.5, pp. 673-702.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705052359

Lee, Carole J.; Sugimoto, Cassidy R.; Zhang, Guo; Cronin, Blaise (2013). “Bias in peer review”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 64, n. 1, pp. 2-17.

https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22784

Leydesdorff, Loet; Etzkowitz, Henry (1996). “Emergence of a triple helix of university-industry-government relations”. Science and public policy, v. 23, n. 5, pp. 279-286.

https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/23.5.279

Liang, Xuan; Su, Leona-Yi-Fan; Yeo, Sara K.; Scheufele, Dietram A.; Brossard, Dominique; Xenos, Michael; Nealey, Paul; Corley, Elizabeth A. (2014). “Building buzz: (Scientists) communicating science in new media environments”. Journalism & mass communication quarterly, v. 91, n. 4, pp. 772-791.

https://goo.gl/MSbvLg

https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699014550092

Lindgren, Lena (2011). “If Robert Merton said it, it must be true: A citation analysis in the field of performance measurement”. Evaluation, v. 17, n. 1, pp. 7-19.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389010389908

Lupton, Deborah (2014). ‘Feeling better connected’: Academics’ use of social media. Report. Canberra: News and Media Research Centre, University of Canberra.

https://www.canberra.edu.au/about-uc/faculties/arts-design/attachments2/pdf/n-and-mrc/Feeling-Better-Connected-report-final.pdf

Mabe, Michael; Mulligan, Adrian (2011). “What journal authors want: Ten years of results from Elsevier's author feedback programme”. New review of information networking, v. 16, n. 1, pp. 71-89.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13614576.2011.574495

Mairesse, Jacques; Turner, Laure (2005). Measurement and explanation of the intensity of co-publication in scientific research: An analysis at the laboratory level (NBER Working paper n. 11172). Revised in 2010. National Bureau of Economic Research.

https://doi.org/10.3386/w11172

https://www.nber.org/papers/w11172

Mallard, Grégoire; Lamont, Michèle; Guetzkow, Joshua (2009). “Fairness as appropriateness. Negotiating epistemological differences in peer review”. Science, technology & human values, v. 34, n. 5, pp. 573-606.

https://goo.gl/wLsFkZ

https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243908329381

Martín-Sempere, María-José; Rey-Rocha, Jesús; Garzón-García, Belén (2002). “The effect of team consolidation on research collaboration and performance of scientists. Case study of Spanish university researchers in Geology”. Scientometrics, v. 55, n. 3, pp. 377-394.

https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020462712923

Mas-Bleda, Amalia; Thelwall, Mike; Kousha, Kayvan; Aguillo, Isidro F. (2014). “Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web?”. Scientometrics, v. 101, n. 1, pp. 337-356.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1345-0

McKiernan, Erin C.; Bourne, Philip E.; Brown, C. Titus; Buck, Stuart; Kenall, Amye; Lin, Jennifer; McDougall, Damon; Nosek, Brian A.; Ram, Karthik; Soderberg, Courtney K.; Spies, Jeffrey R.; Thaney, Kaitlin; Updegrove, Andrew; Woo, Kara H.; Yarkoni, Tal (2016). “How open science helps researchers succeed”. Elife, n. 5, e16800.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16800

Meadows, Arthur-Jack (1998). Communicating research. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. ISBN: 978 0 124874152

Meishar-Tal, Hagit; Pieterse, Efrat (2017). “Why do academics use academic social networking sites?”. The international review of research in open and distributed learning, v. 18, n. 1, pp. 1-22.

https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2643

Melguizo, Tatiana; Strober, Myra H. (2007). “Faculty salaries and the maximization of prestige”. Research in higher education, v. 48, n. 6, pp. 633-668.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9045-0

Menéndez, Maria; De-Angeli, Antonella; Menestrina, Zeno (2012). "Exploring the virtual space of academia". In: Dugdale J., Masclet C., Grasso M., Boujut JF., Hassanaly P. (eds). From research to practice in the design of cooperative systems: Results and open challenges, 49-63. London, UK: Springer. ISBN: 978 1 4471 4093 1

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4093-1_4

Merton, Robert K. (1963). “Resistance to the systematic study of multiple discoveries in science”. European journal of sociology, v. 4, n. 2, pp. 237-282.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975600000801

Merton, Robert K. (1968). “The Matthew effect in science”. Science, v. 159, n. 3810, pp. 56-63.

http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/merton/matthew1.pdf

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56

Merton, Robert K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: The University of Chicago. ISBN: 978 0 226520926

Miller, Alan N.; Taylor, Shannon G.; Bedeian, Arthur G. (2011). “Publish or perish: Academic life as management faculty live it”. Career development international, v. 16, n. 5, pp. 422-445.

https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431111167751

Moe, Rolin (2016). “The phenomenal MOOC”. In: Veletsianos, George (ed.). Emergence and innovation in digital learning: Foundations and applications. Edmonton: Athabasca University Press, pp. 163-178. ISBN: 978 1 771991490

https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781771991490.01

Moed, Henk F.; Halevi, Gali (2015). “Multidimensional assessment of scholarly research impact”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 66, n. 10, pp. 1988-2002.

https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.5520

https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23314

Moodie, Graeme C.; Eustace, Rowland (1974). Power and authority in British universities. London: George Allen & Unwin. ISBN: 978 1 138006409

Moore, Samuel; Neylon, Cameron; Eve, Martin-Paul; O’Donnell, Daniel-Paul; Pattinson, Damian (2017). “‘Excellence R Us’: University research and the fetishisation of excellence”. Palgrave communications, n. 3, 16105.

https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.105

Mulligan, Adrian; Hall, Louise; Raphael, Ellen (2013). “Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 64, n. 1, pp. 132-161.

https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22798

Murray, Fiona (2010). “The oncomouse that roared: Hybrid exchange strategies as a source of distinction at the boundary of overlapping institutions”. American journal of sociology, v. 116, n. 2, pp. 341-388.

https://doi.org/10.1086/653599

Muscanell, Nicole; Utz, Sonja (2017). “Social networking for scientists: An analysis on how and why academics use ResearchGate”. Online information review, v. 41, n. 5, pp. 744-759.

https://goo.gl/kHy29A

https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-07-2016-0185

Nature Publishing Group (2015). Author insights 2015 survey.

https://figshare.com/articles/Author_Insights_2015_survey/1425362

Nedeva, Maria; Boden, Rebecca; Nugroho, Yanuar (2012). “Rank and file: Managing individual performance in university research”. Higher education policy, v. 25, n. 3, pp. 335-360.

https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2012.12

Nentwich, Michael; König, René (2014). "Academia goes Facebook? The potential of social network sites in the scholarly realm". In: Bartling, S., Friesike, S. (eds.). Opening science. Cham: Springer. ISBN: 978 3 319 00026 8

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_7

Ness, Roberta B. (2014). The creativity crisis: Reinventing science to unleash possibility. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978 0 199375387

Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Clark, David (2016). “Scholarly reputation building: How does ResearchGate fare”. International journal of knowledge content development and technology, v. 6, n. 2, pp. 67-92.

https://doi.org/10.5865/IJKCT.2016.6.2.067

Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Jamali, Hamid R. (2015a). Emerging reputation mechanisms for scholars: A literature-based theoretical framework of scholarly activities and a state-of-the-art appraisal of the social networking services used by scholars, to build, maintain and showcase their reputation. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. ISBN: 978 92 79 47225 1

http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC94955/jrc94955.pdf

https://doi.org/10.2791/891948

Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Jamali, Hamid R. (2015b). “Analysis of emerging reputation mechanisms for scholars”. In: Vuorikari, Riina; Punie, Yves (Eds). Analysis of emerging reputation and funding mechanisms in the context of open Science 2.0. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, pp. 3-72.

http://www.ciber-research.eu/download/20150521-Reputation_Mechanisms-Final_report-JRC94952.pdf

https://doi.org/10.2791/84669

Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Jamali, Hamid R.; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Cherifa; Dobrowolski, Tom; Pouchot, Stephanie (2015a). “New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation”. Learned publishing, v. 28, n. 3, pp. 169-183.

https://doi.org/10.1087/20150303

Nicholas, David; Jamali, Hamid R.; Watkinson, Anthony; Herman, Eti; Tenopir, Carol; Volentine, Rachel; Allard, Suzie; Levine, Kenneth (2015b). “Do younger researchers assess trustworthiness differently when deciding what to read and cite and where to publish?”. International journal of knowledge content development and technology, v. 5, n. 2.

https://doi.org/10.5865/IJKCT.2015.5.2.045

Nicholas, David; Watkinson, Anthony; Jamali, Hamid R.; Herman, Eti; Tenopir, Carol; Volentine, Rachel; Allard, Suzie; Levine, Kenneth (2015c). “Peer review: Still king in the digital age”. Learned publishing, v. 28, n. 1, pp. 15-21.

https://doi.org/10.1087/20150104

Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Xu, Jie; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Cherifa; Abrizah, Abdullah; Watkinson, Anthony; Świgoń, Marzena; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca (2018). “Early career researchers' quest for reputation in the digital age”. Journal of scholarly publishing, v. 49, n. 4, pp. 375-396.

https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.49.4.01

Nicholas, David; Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca; Watkinson, Anthony; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Cherifa; Herman, Eti; Xu, Jie; Abrizah, Abdullah; Świgoń, Marzena (2017). “Early career researchers and their publishing and authorship practices”. Learned publishing, v. 30, n. 3, pp. 205-217.

https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1102

Nicholas, David; Watkinson, Anthony; Volentine, Rachel; Allard, Suzie; Levine, Kenneth; Tenopir, Carol; Herman, Eti (2014). “Trust and authority in scholarly communications in the light of the digital transition: Setting the scene for a major study”. Learned publishing, v. 27, n. 2, pp. 121-134.

http://ciber-research.eu/download/20140406-Learned_Publishing_27_2-Trust.pdf

https://doi.org/10.1087/20140206

Ortega, José-Luis (2015). “Relationship between altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic social sites: The case of CSIC's members”. Journal of informetrics, v. 9, n. 1, pp. 39-49.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.11.004

Parra, Cristhian; Casati, Fabio; Daniel, Florian; Marchese, Maurizio; Cernuzzi, Luca; Dumas, Marlon; Kungas, Peep; García-Bañuelos, Luciano; Kisselite, Karina (2011). “Investigating the nature of scientific reputation”. In: 13th Intl Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics Conf., Durban, South Africa.

http://www.floriandaniel.it/papers/ParraISSI2011.pdf

Pearce, Nick; Weller, Martin; Scanlon, Eileen; Ashleigh, Melanie (2010). “Digital scholarship considered: How new technologies could transform academic work”. In education, v. 16, n. 1.

http://ineducation.ca/ineducation/article/view/44/508

Penfield, Teresa; Baker, Matthew J.; Scoble, Rosa; Wykes, Michael C. (2014). “Assessment, evaluations, and definitions of research impact: A review”. Research evaluation, v. 23, n. 1, pp. 21-32.

https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvt021

Piwowar, Heather A.; Vision, Todd J. (2013). "Data reuse and the open data citation advantage". PeerJ, 1, e175.

https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.175

Ponte, Diego; Simon, Judith (2011). “Scholarly communication 2.0: Exploring researchers' opinions on Web 2.0 for scientific knowledge creation, evaluation and dissemination”. Serials review, v. 37, n. 3, pp. 149-156.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2011.10765376

Priem, Jason; Taraborelli, Dario; Groth, Paul; Neylon, Cameron (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto.

http://altmetrics.org/manifesto

Priem, Jason (2014). “Altmetrics”. In: Cronin, Blaise; Sugimoto, Cassidy R. (eds.). Beyond bibliometrics: Harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press. ISBN: 978 0 262525510

https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.01328

Publishing Research Consortium (2016). Publishing research consortium peer review survey 2015. London: Mark Ware Consulting.

http://publishingresearchconsortium.com

Rafols, Ismael; Leydesdorff, Loet; O’Hare, Alice; Nightingale, Paul; Stirling, Andy (2012). “How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation studies and business & management”. Research policy, v. 41, n. 7, pp. 1262-1282.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.015

Rainie, Lee; Funk, Cary; Anderson, Monica (2015). How scientists engage the public. Pew Research Center.

http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/02/15/how-scientists-engage-public

Reif, Fred (1961). “The competitive world of the pure scientist”. Science, v. 134, n. 3494, pp. 1957-1962.

ResearchGate (2018). About.

https://www.researchgate.net/about

RIN (2010). Peer review: A guide for researchers. Research Information Network.

http://www.rin.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/Peer-review-guide-screen.pdf

Rhoten, Diana; Parker, Andrew (2004). “Risks and rewards of an interdisciplinary research path”. Science, v. 306, n. 5704, pp. 2046.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103628

Rhoades, Gary (1998). Managed professionals. Albany: State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978 0 7914 3716 2

Rinne, Risto; Koivula, Jenni (2009). “The dilemmas of the changing university”. In: Shattock, Michael (ed.). Entrepreneurialism in universities and the knowledge economy. Diversification and organisational change in European higher education. London: Open University Press & Paris: IIEP, Unesco, pp. 183-199.

Robson, Sue (2017). “Developing and supporting teaching excellence in higher education”. In: French, Amanda; O’Leary, Mat (eds.). Teaching excellence in higher education. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing, pp. 109-136. ISBN: 978 1 78714 762 1

Rodríguez‐Bravo, Blanca; Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Boukacem‐Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Watkinson, Anthony; Xu, Jie; Abrizah, Abdullah; Świgoń, Marzena (2017). “Peer review: The experience and views of early career researchers”. Learned publishing, v. 30, n. 4, pp. 269-277.

https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1111

Ross-Hellauer, Tony; Deppe, Arvid; Schmidt, Birgit (2017). “Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers”. PloS one, v. 12, n. 12, e0189311.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189311

Rotman, Dana; Preece, Jennifer; Hammock, Jennifer; Procita, Kezee; Hansen, Derek; Parr, Cynthia; Lewis, Darcy; Jacobs, David (2012). “Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects”. In: Procs of the ACM 2012 conf on computer supported cooperative work, pp. 217-226.

http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/trs/2011-28/2011-28.pdf

Rowlands, Ian; Nicholas, David; Russell, Bill; Canty, Nicholas; Watkinson, Anthony (2011). “Social media use in the research workflow”. Learned publishing, v. 24, n. 3, pp. 183-195.

https://doi.org/10.1087/20110306

Scanlon, Eileen (2014). "Scholarship in the digital age: Open educational resources, publication and public engagement". British journal of educational technology, v. 45, n. 1, pp. 12-23.

https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12010

Sense about science (2009). Peer review survey 2009.

http://senseaboutscience.org/activities/peer-review-survey-2009

Shatz, David (2004). Peer review: A critical inquiry. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN: 978 0 742514355

Shirk, Jennifer L.; Ballard, Heidi L.; Wilderman, Candie C.; Phillips, Tina; Wiggins, Andrea; Jordan, Rebecca; McCallie, Ellen; Minarchek, Matthew; Lewenstein, Bruce V.; Krasny, Marianne E.; Bonney, Rick (2012). “Public participation in scientific research: A framework for deliberate design”. Ecology and society, v. 17, n. 2.

https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04705-170229

Shneiderman, Ben (2008). “Science 2.0”. Science, v. 319, n. 5868, pp. 1349-1350.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1153539

Siler, Kyle; Lee, Kirby; Bero, Lisa (2015). “Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 112, n. 2, pp. 360-365.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1418218112

Singh, Jasjit; Fleming, Lee (2010). “Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality?”. Management science, v. 56, n. 1, pp. 41-56.

https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1072

Slaughter, Sheila; Leslie, Larry L. (2001). “Expanding and elaborating the concept of academic capitalism”. Organization, v. 8, n. 2, pp. 154-161.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508401082003

Sonnenwald, Diane H. (2007). “Scientific collaboration”. Annual review of information science and technology, v. 41, n. 1, pp. 643-681.

https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410121

Souder, Lawrence (2011). “The ethics of scholarly peer review: A review of the literature”. Learned publishing, v. 24, n. 1, pp. 55-74.

https://doi.org/10.1087/20110109

Storer, Norman W. (1963). “Institutional norms and personal motives in science”. In: The annual meetings of the Eastern Sociological Society, April 6, New York.

Storer, Norman W. (1966). The social system of science. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 978 0 030568657

Sugimoto, Cassidy R.; Work, Sam; Larivière, Vincent; Haustein, Stefanie (2017). “Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 68, n. 9, pp. 2037-2062.

https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.08112

https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23833

Tahamtan, Iman; Afshar, Askar-Safipour; Ahamdzadeh, Khadijeh (2016). “Factors affecting number of citations: A comprehensive review of the literature”. Scientometrics, v. 107, n. 3, pp. 1195-225.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2

Taylor & Francis (2016). Peer review in 2015: A global view.

https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/peer-review-global-view

Tennant, Jonathan; Dugan, Jonathan M.; Graziotin, Daniel; Jacques, Damien C.; Waldner, François; Mietchen, Daniel; Elkhatib, Yehia; Collister, Lauren B.; Pikas, Christina K.; Crick, Tom; Masuzzo, Paola; Caravaggi, Anthony; Berg, Devin R.; Niemeyer, Kyle E.; Ross-Hellauer, Tony; Mannheimer, Sara; Rigling, Lilian; Katz, Daniel S.; Greshake-Tzovaras, Bastian; Pacheco-Mendoza, Josmel; Fatima, Nazeefa; Poblet, Marta; Isaakidis, Marios; Irawan, Dasapta-Erwin; Renaut, Sébastien; Madan, Christopher R.; Matthias, Lisa; Kjaer, Jesper-Norgaard; O’Donnell, Daniel-Paul; Neylon, Cameron; Kearns, Sarah; Selvaraju, Manojkumar; Colomb, Julien (2017). “A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review”. F1000 Research, n. 6, 1151.

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12037.3

Tennant, Jonathan P. (2018). “The state of the art in peer review”. FEMS Microbiology letters, v. 365, n. 19, fny204.

https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fny204

Tenopir, Carol (2016). “Changes in the digital scholarly environment and issues of trust: An exploratory, qualitative analysis”. Information processing & management, v. 52, n. 3, pp. 446-458.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2015.10.002

Tenopir, Carol; Levine, Kenneth; Allard, Suzie; Christian, Lisa; Volentine, Rachel; Boehm, Reid; Nichols, Frances; Nicholas, David; Jamali, Hamid R.; Herman, Eti; Watkinson, Anthony (2015). “Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age: Results of an international questionnaire”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 67, n. 10, pp. 2344-2361.

https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23598

Truex, Duane; Cuellar, Michael; Vidgen, Richard; Takeda, Hirotoshi (2011). “Emancipating scholars: Reconceptualizing scholarly output”. In: 7th Intl critical management studies conf (Cms7 2001). Naples, Italy, July 11-13. Naples: CMS7.

http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:459506/FULLTEXT02

Van-Arensbergen, Pleun; Van-der-Weijden, Inge; Van-den-Besselaar, Peter (2014). “The selection of talent as a group process. A literature review on the social dynamics of decision making in grant panels”. Research evaluation, v. 23, n. 4, pp. 298-311.

https://goo.gl/rfaL4t

https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvu017

Van-Dalen, Hendrik P.; Henkens, Kène (2001). "What makes a scientific article influential? The case of demographers". Scientometrics, v. 50, n. 3, pp. 455-482.

https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010510831718

Van-Dalen, Hendrik P.; Henkens, Kène (2012). “Intended and unintended consequences of a publish‐or‐perish culture: A worldwide survey”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 63, m. 7, pp. 1282-1293.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1983205

https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22636

Van-Noorden, Richard (2014). “Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network”. Nature, v. 512, n. 7513, pp. 126-129.

https://doi.org/10.1038/512126a

Van-Noorden, Richard (2015). “Interdisciplinary research by the numbers”. Nature news, v. 525, n. 7569, pp. 306-307.

https://goo.gl/BGRVf2

Van-Raan, Anthony F. J. (1998). “The influence of international collaboration of the impact of the research results”. Scientometrics, v. 42, n. 3, pp. 423-428.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458380

Van-Rijnsoever, Frank J.; Hessels, Laurens K. (2011). “Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration”. Research policy, v. 40, n. 3, pp. 463-472.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.11.001

Vannini, Phillip (2006). “Dead poets' society: Teaching, publish‐or‐perish, and professors' experiences of authenticity”. Symbolic interaction, v. 29, n. 2, pp. 235-57.

https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2006.29.2.235

Veletsianos, George (2016). “The defining characteristics of emerging technologies and emerging practices in digital education”. In: Veletsianos, George (ed.). Emergence and innovation in digital learning: Foundations and applications. Edmonton: Athabasca University Press, pp. 3-16. ISBN: 978 1 771991490

https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781771991490.01

Veletsianos, George; Kimmons, Royce (2012). “Assumptions and challenges of open scholarship”. The international review of research in open and distance learning, v. 13, n. 4, pp. 166-189.

https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1313

Vicente-Sáez, Rubén; Martínez-Fuentes, Clara (2018). “Open science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition”. Journal of business research, v. 88, pp. 428-436.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.043

Voas, Jeffrey; Hurlburt, George F.; Miller, Keith W.; Laplante, Phillip A.; Michael, Bret (2011). “Thoughts on higher education and scientific research”. IT professional, v. 13, n. 2, pp. 6-9.

https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2011.34

Waaijer, Cathelijn J.; Teelken, Christine; Wouters, Paul F.; Van-der-Weijden, Inge C. (2018). “Competition in science: Links between publication pressure, grant pressure and the academic job market”. Higher education policy, v. 31, n. 2, pp. 225-243.

https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-017-0051-y

Waltman, Lutz (2016). “A review of the literature on citation impact indicators”. Journal of informetrics, v. 10, n. 2, pp. 365-91.

https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.02099

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007

Wang, Jian; Thijs, Bart; Glänzel, Wolfang (2015). “Interdisciplinarity and impact: Distinct effects of variety, balance, and disparity”. PloS one, v. 10, n. 5, e0127298.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127298

Ware, Mark; Monkman, Mike (2008). Peer review in scholarly journals. An international study into the perspective of the scholarly community. Mark Ware Consulting.

http://publishingresearchconsortium.com/index.php/112-prc-projects/research-reports/peer-review-in-scholarly-journals-research-report/142-peer-review-in-scholarly-journals-perspective-of-the-scholarly-community-an-international-study

Watkinson, Anthony; Nicholas, David; Thornley, Clare; Herman, Eti; Jamali, Hamid R.; Volentine, Rachel; Allard, Suzie; Levine, Kenneth;

Weller, Ann (2001). Editorial peer review: It's strengths and weaknesses. Medford, NJ: Information Today. ISBN: 978 1 573871006

Weller, Martin (2011). The digital scholar: How technology is transforming academic practice. Basingstoke: Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN: 978 1 84966 617 6

http://blog.edtechie.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/The-Digital-Scholar_-How-Technology-Is-T-Martin-Weller.pdf

Weller, Saranne (2016). Academic practice: Developing as a professional in higher education. London, UK: Sage. ISBN: 978 1 446274231

White, David S.; Le-Cornu, Alison (2011). “Visitors and residents: A new typology for online engagement”. First Monday, v. 16, n. 9.

https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v16i9.3171

Williamson, Kirsty; Kennan, Mary-Anne; Johanson, Graeme; Weckert, John (2016). “Data sharing for the advancement of science: Overcoming barriers for citizen scientists”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 67, n. 10, pp. 2392-2403.

https://researchoutput.csu.edu.au/ws/portalfiles/portal/8971975/1000005591Accepted+Manuscript.pdf

https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23564

Willinsky, John (2010). "Open access and academic reputation". Annals of library and information studies. v. 57, pp. 296-302.

http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/10242/4/ALIS%2057%283%29%20296-302.pdf

Willyard, Cassandra; Scudellari, Megan; Nordling, Linda (2018). “How three research groups are tearing down the ivory tower: The people who should benefit from research are increasingly shaping how it is done”. Nature, n. 562, pp. 24-28.

https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06858-4

Wilsdon, James; Allen, Liz; Belfiore, Eleonora; Campbell, Philip; Curry, Stephen; Hill, Steven; Jones, Richard; Kain, Roger; Kerridge, Simon; Thelwall, Mike; Tinkler, Jane; Viney, Ian; Wouters, Paul; Hill, Jude; Johnson, Ben (2015). The metric tide: Report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management.

https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363

Wilson, Logan (1942). The academic man: A study in the sociology of a profession. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978 1 560008101

Winter, Richard-Philip (2017). Managing academics: A question of perspective. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. ISBN: 978 1 781006689

Wolff-Eisenberg, Christine; Rod, Alisa B.; Schonfeld, Roger C. (2016a). Ithaka S+R US faculty survey 2015. New York, NY.: Ithaka S+R.

https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.277685

Wolff-Eisenberg, Christine; Rod, Alisa B.; Schonfeld, Roger C. (2016b). UK survey of academics 2015: Ithaka S+R | Jisc | RLUK. New York, NY.: Ithaka S+R.

https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.2827

Wood, Phil (2017). “From teaching excellence to emergent pedagogies: A complex process alternative to understanding the role of teaching in higher education”. In: French, Amanda; O’Leary, Mat (eds.) Teaching excellence in higher education. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing, pp. 39-74. ISBN: 978 1 78714 762 1

Wouters, Paul; Thelwall, Mike; Kousha, Kayvan; Waltman, Ludo; De-Rijcke, Sarah; Rushforth, Alex; Franssen, Thomas (2015). The metric tide: Literature review (Supplementary Report I to the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management). The Higher Education Funding Council for England.

https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.5066.3520

Wouters, Paul; Costas, Rodrigo (2012). Users, narcissism and control: Tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century. Utrecht: SURF Foundation.

http://sticonference.org/Proceedings/vol2/Wouters_Users_847.pdf

Wray, K. Brad (2006). “Scientific authorship in the age of collaborative research”. Studies in history and philosophy of science. Part A, v. 37, n. 3, pp. 505-514.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.07.011

Wuchty, Stefan; Jones, Benjamin F.; Uzzi, Brian (2007). “The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge”. Science, v. 316, n. 5827, pp. 1036-1039.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099

Zheng, Han; Erdt, Mojisola; Theng, Yin-Leng (2018). “How do scholars evaluate and promote research outputs? An NTU case study”. In: Erdt, Mojisola; Sesagiri-Raamkumar, Aravind; Rasmussen, Edie; Theng, Yin-Leng (eds.). Altmetrics for research outputs measurement and scholarly information management. Arosim 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, v. 856. Singapore: Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1053-9_6


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS