Product/service diversification through direct, indirect and additional services: librarian’s perspective in Sri Lankan Universities

Arachchige, J J G Product/service diversification through direct, indirect and additional services: librarian’s perspective in Sri Lankan Universities. Journal of the University Librarians Association of Sri Lanka, 2020, vol. 23, n. 2, pp. 89-114. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
Text
JULA arti 2020.pdf

Download (372kB) | Preview
Alternative locations: https://jula.sljol.info/.

English abstract

In the prevailing competitive environment, libraries seem difficult to survive with traditional information services. Many of business organizations seem to practice multidimensional businesses and expand their profit potentials through diversification. Getting experience from business sector organizations, university libraries need to strategize the service delivery and retain the users through diversification of the product/service. Diversification can be implemented through innovation of directly related library services, indirectly related services and additional services probably not related to the typical library service but would be possible to provide by the library (out of the box). This paper investigates the Sri Lankan university librarians’ perspective towards the implementation of such services in their libraries. The study also examines the possible barriers for the diversification. The paper involved the conceptual analysis and sample survey with library practitioners. Findings indicate that university libraries in Sri Lanka are providing diversity of services and have made many attempts to diversify them through ‘direct library services’, ‘indirect library services’ and ‘additional services’. Relatively higher potential is shown with regard to directly and indirectly related services but the diversification through additional services indicated very low. The librarians face challenges for diversification stretching out through administrative factors, knowledge deficiencies, organizational environment and attitudinal issues of library managers.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Product/service Diversification, Academic Libraries, University Library Diversification, Out of the Box Services, Information Marketing
Subjects: F. Management. > FB. Marketing.
Depositing user: J.J.G. Arachchige
Date deposited: 03 Oct 2020 22:40
Last modified: 03 Oct 2020 22:40
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/40482

References

Akingbola, K., Rogers, S. E. & Baluch, A. (2019). Change management in nonprofit organizations: theory and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan/Springer:Gewerbestresse.

Ansoff, H. I. (2007). Strategic Management [Classic ed.]. Palgrave Macmillan:Houndmills.

Ansoff, I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), pp.113-124.

Boateng, R., Mbarika, V., & Thomas, C. (2010). When Web 2.0 becomes an organizational learning tool: evaluating Web 2.0 tools. Development and Learning in Organizations, 24(3), pp. 17-20.

Casey, M. (2006). Library Crunch: bringing you a library 2.0 perspective. Available at http://www.librarycrunch.com/ [Accessed May 18, 2006].

Casey, M. E. & Laura C. Savastinuk. L.C. (2007). Library 2.0: a guide to participatory library service. Medford, N.J.: Information Today.

Chad, K. (2014). Library management system to library services platform. Resource management for libraries: a new perspective Ken Chad. HELibTech Briefing Paper. August 2015 Technical Report• [online] DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4315.3128. available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281238083_Library_management_system_to_library_services_platform_Resource_management_for_libraries_a_new_perspective_Higher_Education_Library_Technology_Briefing_paper?channel=doi&linkId=55dc5c8608aec156b9b141c9&showFulltext=true. [accessed February 23, 2019].

Curran, K., Murray, M., Norrby, D. S. & Christian, M. (2006), Involving the user through Library 2.0. New Review of Information Networking, 12(1), pp. 47–59.

Dempsey L. & Malpas C. (2018). Academic library futures in a diversified university system. In: Gleason N. (eds) Higher education in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Pp. 65-89. Palgrave Macmillan:Singapore.

Duizer, L. M., Robertson, T., & Han, J. (2009). Requirements for packaging from an ageing consumer’s perspective. Packaging Technology and Science, 22(4), 187–197. doi:10.1002/pts.834.

Eckardt, R., & Skaggs, B. C. (2018). Service diversification and growth of professional service firms. Long Range Planning, 51(1), pp. 111–126. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.003

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Galunic, D. C. (2000). Coevolving at last, a way to make synergies work. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), p. 91.

Gamage, R. (2009). Extended roles and responsibilities of library sssociation web sites. Journal of the University Librarians Association of Sri Lanka, 13(1), pp.47–60. https://doi.org/10.4038/jula.v13i1.1333.

Gerolimos, M. & Konsta, R. (2011). Services for academic libraries in the new era. D-Lib Magazine, 17(7/8), pp. 1-22.

Gluck, F.W., Kaufman, S.P. & Walleck, A.S. (1980). Strategic management for competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review. 58(4), pp.154-161.

Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R.D. & Hoskisson, R.E. (2013). Strategic management: concepts and cases: competitiveness and globalization. South-Western Cengage Learning:Australia.

Hudson, A. (2011). Librarians in Second Life and future Virtual Worlds. In: Zabel, D., ed. 2011. Reference Reborn: Breathing New Life into public services librarianship. California:ABC-CLIO, LCC. Ch. 5.

Iwu-James, J., Haliso, Y., & Ifijeh, G. (2019). Leveraging competitive intelligence for successful marketing of academic library services. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 26(1) pp.151–164. doi:10.1080/13614533.2019.1632215.

Japheth, Y. A., Achonna, A. U., & Osisanwo, T. (2014). Competitive intelligence: a tool for effective job performance in academic library. 2(4), pp.20-27. Available online http://www.Skyjournals.org/SIER .

Kane K, Robinson-Combre J & Berge Z. L. (2009). Tapping into social networking: collaborating enhances both knowledge management and e-learning. The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 40(1), pp. 62–70.

Kenney, A. K., McGovern, N. Y., Martinez, I. T., & Heidig, L. T. (2003). Google meets eBay: what academic librarians can learn for alternative information providers. D-Lib Magazine, 9(6), Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june03/kenney/06kenney.html [accessed March 30, 2019].

Kerr, P.A. (2010). Conceptions and practice of information literacy in academic libraries: espoused theories and theories-in-use. [PhD thesis]. Graduate School of New Brunswick: New Jersey.

Kreitz, P. A. (2015). Redefining the twenty-first century college library: Change leadership in academic libraries (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from PQDT Open https://pqdtopen.proquest.com/doc/1708985779.html?FM. [accessed April 18, 2019].

Ludwig, L. & Starr, S. (2005). Library as place: results of a Delphi study. Journal of Medical Library Association. 93(3). pp.315-326.

Lynch, R. (2006). Cooperate strategy. Prentice-Hall: London.

Malenfant, K. J. (2011). Understanding faculty perceptions of the future: an action research for academic librarians (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://aura.antioch.edu/etds/19. [accessed February 23, 2019].

Maness, J. (2006). Library 2.0 Theory: Web 2.0 and its implications for libraries. Webology, 3(2). Available at http://www.webology.org/2006/v3n2/a25.html.

Meldrum M. & McDonald M. (1995). The Ansoff Matrix. In: Key Marketing Concepts. Palgrave: London

Moussetis, R. (2011). Ansoff revisited: how Ansoff interfaces with both the planning and learning schools of thought in strategy. Journal of Management History, 17(1), pp. 102-125: DOI 10.1108/17511341111099556.

Musembe, C.N. (2016). Records management in institutions of higher learning: towards the business support function. International Journal of Library and Information Science Studies, 2(1), pp.13-28.

Neal, J.G. (2011).Stop the madness: the insanity of ROI and the need for new qualitative measures of academic library success. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACRL Conference, pp. 424‐439. Available at: www.ala.org/acrl/files/conferences/confsandpreconfs/national/2011/papers.

Punchihewa, C.N.D. (2018). How do Sri Lankan University libraries employ Web 2.0 tools in providing web-based library services? : a comparative study . Journal of the University Librarians Association of Sri Lanka, 21(1),pp. 10-39. DOI:http://doi.org/10.4038/jula.v21i1.7909

Quanlan, N. & Hegarty, N. (2006), Librarians outside the box: Waterford Institute of Technology's library-based virtual learning environment (VLE) training and development programme. New Library World 107(1/2), pp.37-47. DOI: 10.1108/03074800610639021.

Ranaweera, A., & Li, S. (2016). Web based library services of university libraries in Sri Lanka: A content analysis. In Proceedings of 8th Shanghai International Library Forum (SILF2016). Shanghai, China

Rehman, A. & Shafique, F. (2011). Use of Web 2.0 and its implications for libraries: Perceptions of Information Professionals in Pakistan. Library Philosophy and Practice [e-journal]. 623. Available at https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/623 [accessed October 23, 2019].

Sauers, M. & Trueman, R. (2007). Second Life & Info Island: library service in a Virtual World. [ppt presentation] available at https://www.slideshare.net/travelinlibrarian/second-life-info-island-library-service-in-a-virtual-world.

Schilling, M. A. & Hill, C.W. (1998), Managing the new product development process: strategic imperatives, Academy of Management Executive, 12(3), pp. 67-81.

Shafique, F. & Riedling, A. (2013), Survival avenues for Pakistani libraries in the era of emerging technologies. The Electronic Library archive, 31(4), pp.412-132, doi>10.1108/EL-02-2011-0025.

Tait, E., Konstantina, M., & Peter, R. (2016). Libraries for the future: the role of IT utilities in the transformation of academic libraries. Palgrave Communications, 2(1), pp. 60–70. DOI:10.1057/palcomms.2016.70.

Tapera, J. (2014). The importance of strategic management to business organizations. The international Journal’s (RJSSM), 3(11), pp. 122-131.

Trtikova, I. & Nemeckova, L. (2012). Marketing tools to support university library’s mission. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries (QQML), 1(2), pp.205 –212.

Virgil C.L. (2013). An analysis of the academic library and the changing role of the academic librarian in higher education: 1975 – 2012. [PhD. thesis]. Lindenwood University. Available at : https://pqdtopen.proquest.com/doc/1466301072.html?FMT=AI.

Walton, G. (2007). Theory, research and practice in library management 3. Diversification, Library Management 28(6/7), pp.428-436.

Williams, D.E. & Golden, J. (ed.s) (2011). Advances in library administration and organization. Vol 30. Emerald Group Publishing limited: Bingley. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0732-0671(2011)0000030012.

Wilson, K., Neylon, C., Montgomery, L., & Huang, C.-K. (2019). Access to academic libraries: an indicator of openness? Information Research, 24(1), paper 809. Available at http://InformationR.net/ir/24-1/paper809.html (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/76tOSpfrn).

Xu, C., Ouyang, F. and Chu, H. (2009), The academic library meets Web 2.0: applications and implications. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 35(4), pp. 324-331, doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2009.04.003.

Zhao, H. & Luo, Y. (2002). Product diversification, ownership structure, and subsidiary performance in China's dynamic market. Management International Review (MIR), 42(1), pp. 27-48.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item