Examining the relationship between competitive capability and perceived service quality in university libraries

Arachchige, J J G and Singh, Diljit and Weerasooriya, W A Examining the relationship between competitive capability and perceived service quality in university libraries. Journal of the University Librarians Association of Sri Lanka (JULA), 2021, vol. 24, n. 1, pp. 1-38. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
Text
JULA-24-1-12 formatted-100542021 E-Lis.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview

English abstract

As modern Information Technology has created a way to a variety of information service opportunities, many options other than the conventional library service are available for users. A stiff competition has emerged among information service providers and therefore university library professionals too have to think of their competitive advantage. Service quality has gained a high concern as a strategy for developing the competitive position of an organization and many studies in different fields have established a strong relationship between service quality and competitive advantage. Viewing inversely, some practitioners contemplate that the competitive position of resource capabilities can influence the improvement of service quality. In order to examine the relationship between competitive position and the service quality in a university library context, an exploratory survey was employed utilizing a VRIO based questionnaire and LibQUAL+ based instrument with 89 library professionals selected from 15 state university libraries in Sri Lanka. The study reveals that there is a moderate positive correlation between two variables (r = .286, n= 66, p = .020). As the relationship is moderate, further studies seem essential to support the hypothesis. The large percentage of residuals indicates that there are more factors contributing to the service quality in university libraries. This study deploys a robust process to develop a measuring instrument for a competitive position in university libraries and uncovers many research areas in the field.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Competitive Position; Service Quality; Information Marketing; Competitive Capabilities; VRIO; RBV Theory; Resource Capabilities.
Subjects: F. Management. > FB. Marketing.
F. Management. > FJ. Knowledge management
Depositing user: J.J.G. Arachchige
Date deposited: 11 May 2021 07:38
Last modified: 11 May 2021 07:38
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/42009

References

Adeniran, P. (2011). User satisfaction with academic libraries services: Academic staff and students perspectives. International Journal of Library and Information Science, 3(10) . 209-216.

Ahmad, M. (2016). Service level agreements framework for digital library quality of servic management [Ph.D. thesis]. Deakin University.

Ahmed, S. & Islam, R. (2012). Students' perception on library service quality: a qualitative study of IIUM library. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 6(2) 19-29.

Alghamdi, H. & Bach, C. (2013). Quality as competitive advantage. International Journal of Management & Information Technology, 8(1) .1265-1272. DOI: 10.24297/ijmit.v8i1.690.

Altman, F. & Hernon, P. (1998). Service quality and customer satisfaction do matter. American Libraries, 29(7) 53-55.

Al-Wugayan, A. & Leshko, L. P. (2010). A study of satisfaction, loyalty, and market share in Kuwait banks. Allied Academies International Conference. Academy for Studies in International Business. Proceedings, 10(1) .2-8.

Amit, R. Schoemaker, J. H. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management J ournal. 14(1) 33-46.

Amit, R. Schoemaker, J. H. (2016). Firm resources: In the Palgrave encyclopedia of strategic management. Mie Augier & David Teece (eds.). Palgrave Macmillan:UK

Andaleeb, S. S. & Simmonds, P. L. (1998). Explaining user satisfaction with academic libraries: strategic implications. College and Research libraries, 59(2) 156-167.

Asubonteng, P., McCleary, K. J. & Swan, J. E. (1996). SERVQUAL revisited: A critical review of service quality, The Journal of Services Marketing, 10(6) 62-81.

Baia, E., Ferreira, J. J. & Rodrigues, R. (2019). Value and rareness of resources and capabilities as sources of competitive advantage and superior performance. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 18(3) 249–262. doi:10.1080/14778238.2019.1599308

Barney, J. B, & Hesterly, W.S (2010). Strategic management and competitive advantage concept. Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper saddle River, N.J

Barney, J.B. (1991), Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17(1) 99-120.

Barney, J. B. (1995) Looking Inside for competitive advantage. Academy of Management Executive, 9(4) 49-61.

Barney, J. B. (1997). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley

Barney, J. B., (2001). Is the Resource-Based “View” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26(1) 41-56.

Black, J. A. & Boal, K.B. (1994). Strategic resources: Traits, configurations and paths to sustainable competitive advantage. , 15(Supplement S2) 131–148. doi:10.1002/smj.4250151009

Bogaert, I., Maertens, R. & Van C. (1994). A strategy as a situational puzzle: The first of components, In Hamel, G. & Heene, A. (eds.). Competence-Based Competition, John Wiley: Chichester,

Boyce, C. (2017). Measuring Perceptual (In)Congruence between information service providers and users. College & Research Libraries.78(3) 359-380. doi:10.5860/crl.78.3.359.

Brown, T. J., Churchill, G. A. & Peter, J. P. (1993). Research note: Improving the measurement of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 69(1) 127–139.

Calvert, P.J. (2008). Assessing the effectiveness and quality of libraries [PhD thesis]. Victoria University of Wellington: New Zealand.

Churchill, G.A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1) 64-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3150876.

Connaway, L. S., Dickey, T. J. & Radford, M.L. (2011). If it is too inconvenient, I'm not going after it: convenience as a critical factor in information-seeking behaviors. Library and Information Science Research. 33(3) 179-190. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2010.12.002

Connaway, L.S. & Randall, K.M. (2013). Why the Internet is more attractive than the library. The Serials Librarian, 64(1-4) 41-56. doi: 10.1080/0361526X.2013.761053.

Cordes, S. (2008). Process management for library multimedia development service. Library Management, 29(3) 185-198.

Corrall, S. (2014). Library service capital: the case for measuring and managing intangible assets. In: Libraries in the Digital Age (LIDA) 2014, 16 June 2014 -20 June 2014, Zadar, Croatia.

Cronin, J.J. & Taylor, S.A.. (1992). Measuring service quality: Are- examination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(3) 55-68.

Cullen, R. (2001). Perspective on user satisfaction surveys. Library Trends, 49(4) 662-686.

Dadoa, A.; Petrovicovaa, J.T., Cuzovicband, S. & Rajicc. T. (2012). An empirical examination of the relationships between service quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions in higher education setting. Serbian Journal of Management 7(2) 203–218.

Davis & Simpson (2017). Resource-Based Theory, competition and staff differentiation in Africa: Leveraging employees as a source of sustained competitive advantage. American Journal of Management. 17(1) 19-33.

Dominic, P. D. D., Goh, K. N., Wong, D. & Chen, Y.Y. (2010). The importance of service quality for competitive advantage – with special reference to industrial product. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 6(3) 378-397.

Edvinsson, L. & Malone, M. (1997) Intellectual Capital. Harper Business: New York

Field, A. (2013) Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics: And Sex and Drugs and Rock “N” Roll, 4th ed. Sage: London.

Fiol, M. (1991). Managing culture as a competitive resource: An identity-based view of sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 1, 191–211.

Grant, R. M. (1991). The Resource-Based Theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3) 14-35.

Grant, R.M. (1996), Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4) 375-387.

Grasenick, K. & Low, L. (2004). Shaken, not stirred: Defining and connecting indicators for the measurement and valuation of intangibles. Journal of Intellectual Capital 5(2) 268-281. DOI: 10.1108/14691930410533696

Hamel, G. & Prahalad, C.K., (1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation, Harvard Business Review, (May-June) 79-91.

Hewlett, J. & Walton, G. (2001). Assessing the quality of library and information services for United Kingdom health professionals and students: A comparison of the national health service and higher education approaches and the way forward. Performance Measurement & Metrics, 2(2) 81–95.

Hernon, P. & Altman, E. (1996). Service quality in academic libraries. Ablex Publishing Corp: Norwood, New Jersey.

Hernon, P., Nitecki, D. & Altman, E. (1999). Service quality and customer satisfaction; An assessment and future directions. Journal of Academic Librarianship. 25(1) 9-17.

Hitt, M., & Ireland, R. (1985). Corporate distinctive competence, strategy, industry and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3) 273-293.

Hoffman, A. J. (2000). Competitive environmental strategy: A guide to the changing business landscape. Island Press: Washington D.C.

Hutcheson, G. & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist. Sage: London.

Jayasundara, C., Ngulube, P. & Minishi-Majanja, M. K. (2009). A theoretical model to predict customer satisfaction in relation to service quality in selected university libraries in Sri Lanka. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 75(2) 179-194.

Kadli, J. H. & Kumbar, B. D. (2013). Library resources, services and information seeking behaviour in changing ICT environment: A literature review. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Paper 951. Available at https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/951.

Kostagiolas, P.A. & Asonitis, S. (2009). Intangible assets for academic libraries: Definitions, categorization and an exploration of management issues. Library Management, 30(6/7) 419-429. DOI 10.1108/01435120910982113.

Kraaijenbrink, J., Spencer & J. C., Groen, A. J. (2010). The Resource-Based View: A review and assessment of its critiques. Journal of Management, 36(1) 349-37.

Kwanya, T., Johnston, L., Lupold, A. & Stilwell, C. (2018) Optimizing library services--enhancing the competitive advantage of libraries through social media marketing, Against the Grain, 28(3), Article 38, 60-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7771/2380-176X.7384.

Kyrillidou, M. (2008) [ed.]. LibQUAL+® and beyond: Library assessment with a focus on library Improvemen. Performanc e Measurement and Metrics, 9(3) 157-230.

Kyrillidou, M. (2009). Item sampling in service quality assessment surveys to improve response rates and reduce respondent burden: the “LibQUAL+® Lite” Randomized Control Trial (RCT). [Ph.D. thesis]. Graduate College, University of Illinois: Urbana-Champaign.

Lado, A. A., Boyd, N. G. & Hanlon, S. C. (1997). Competition, cooperation, and the search for economic rents: A syncretic model. Academy of Management Review, 22(1) 110–141.

Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4) 563–575. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x

Leonard-Barton, D. A. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing New Product Development. Strategic Management Journal 13(Summer) 111–125.

Lewis, B. R., Templeton, G. F. & Byrd, T. A. (2005). A methodology for construct development in MIS research. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(4) 388-400, doi 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000552.

Li, L. (2017). Measuring an academic library’s performance and service: A case study in Georgia Southern University Library. International Journal of Librarianship, 2(1) 53-65. doi.org/10.23974/ijol.2017.vol2.1.26.

Lin, C., Tsai, H. L., Wu, Y.J. & Kiang, M., (2012). A fuzzy quantitative VRIO-based framework for evaluating organizational activities. Management Decision, 50(8) 1396-1411.

Line, M.B. (1994), The Pursuit of Competitive advantage in libraries leads... Where? New Library World, 95(6) 4-6. doi.org/10.1108/03074809410065472.

Madhani, P. M. (2010), The Resource - Based View (RBV): Issues and perspectives. PACE. Journal of Research of Prestige Institute of Management, 1(1) 43-55.

Mukuvi, M. (2013). Using the gap model to assess users’ perception of service quality levels in academic libraries: a case of post modern library, Kenyatta University and USIU library. [PhD. Thesis]. Kenyatta University.

Murray, P. & Donegan, K. (2003). Empirical linkages between firm competencies and organizational learning. The Learning Organization, 10(1) 51-62.

Musyoka, K. (2013). Service quality and library user satisfaction among universities in Kenya [Masters thesis]. University of Nairobi.

Negi, R. (2009). Determining customer satisfaction through perceived service quality: a study of Ethiopian mobile users. International Journal of Mobile Marketing, 4(1) 31-38.

Nawarathne, I. M. & Singh, A.P. (2013). Service quality and user satisfaction in Sri Lankan academic libraries: a comparative study. Journal of Knowledge & Communication Management , 3(2) 149-164.

Newbert, S.L. (2007). Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: An assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal, 28 .121–146. Retrieved from Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) doi: 10.1002/smj.573.

Nicol, E.C., & O’English, M., (2012). Rising tides: faculty expectations of library websites. Portal libraries and the Academy, 12(4) 371-380.

Norliya A., K. & Khasiah Z. (2006) Users’ perceptions on the contributions of UiTM Libraries in creating a learning environment. Research Report. Shah Alam: Universiti Teknologi MARA.

Nyantakyi-Baah, L. (2016). User perception of academic library service quality and value: The case of the Ghana Institute of Journalism and Ashesi University College Libraries [M.Phil. thesis]: University of Cape Town.

Pai, T.A & Shivalingaiah, D. (2004). Customer's perception of service quality in libraries. Annals of Library and Information Studies 51(4) 145-151.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml V. & Berry, L. (1988). SERVQUAL: a multiple item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing. 64(1) 12-37.

Penrose, E.T. (1959). The growth of the firm. Wiley: New York.

Peris-Ortiz, M., Álvarez-García, J. & Rueda-Armengot, C. (2015). Achieving competitive advantage through quality management. Springer International Publishing: Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-17251-4.

Pina, M. (2011). Obtaining competitive advantages based on specific resources and capabilities: the case of Corticeira Amorim. [Masters theses]. Universidade Católica: Portuguesa.

Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Advantage, Free Press, New York.

Posey, J.A. (2009). Student perception and expectations of library service quality and user satisfaction at Walters State Community College [PhD. thesis]. Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Analysis, East Tennessee State University.

Prahalad , C.K.S. & Hamel G. (1994). Competing for future. Harvard Buisiness School Press.

Reilly, R. F. & Schweihs, R. P. (1998). Valuing intangible assets. McGraw Hill Professional: Boston.

Roos, G., Pike, S. & Fernström, L. (2012). Managing intellectual capital in practice. Routledge: London.

Samyal, J. K. & Sumi, S. & Singh, G. (2010). Redesigning Academic Libraries: Moving towards user-oriented services & resources. International Journal of Library Science. 2 (A10) 31-38.

Santos, J. (2003). E-service quality: A model of virtual service dimensions. Managing Service Quality, 13(3) 233-247.

Sara, Q. (2013). Service quality & customer satisfaction: A case of banking sector [Masters Thesis]. University of Gavle. Available at: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:706160/FULLTEXT02 [Accessed February 25, 2020].

Saravanan, R. & Rao, K. S. P. (2007). Measurement of service quality from the customer's perspective: An empirical study. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 18(4) 435-449. doi:10.1080/14783360701231872.

Senyard, J. M., Baker, T. & Steffens, P. R. (2010). Entrepreneurial bricolage and firm performance: moderating effects of firm change and innovativeness. In: 2010 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management - Dare to Care: Passion and Compassion in Management Practice & Research, 6 –10 August, Montreal, Canada.

Sessions, J.A., Schenck, A. & Shrimplin, A. K. (2002). LibQUAL+™ at Miami University: A look from outside ARL. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 3(2) 59-67.

Seth, A., Momaya, K. & Gupta, H.M. (2008). Managing the customer perceived service quality for cellular mobile telephony: An empirical investigation. Vikalpa, 33(1) 19-34.

Shepherd, C. (1999). Service quality and the sales force: A tool for competitive advantage. The Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 19(3) .73-82.

Somaratna,.S.D.& Pieris, C. N. (2011) Service quality in University of Colombo libraries: An assessment. Annals of Library and Information studies. 58(2) 170-183.

Somaratna S.D.; Pieris, C, & Jayasundara, C.C (2010) User expectation verses perception of service quality in University Libraries: A case study. International Conference of University Librarians Association Sri Lanka ICULA 2010 – July 14 – 15, Colombo. Pp. 69-82.

Sveiby, K. E. (2001). A knowledge-based theory of the firm to guide in strategy formulation. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 2(4) 344-358.

Talaja, A. (2012). Testing VRIN framework and rareness as sources of competitive advantage and above average performance. Management, 17(2) 51-64.

Teece, D. J., Pizano, G, & Shyen, A . (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7) 509–533.

Thompson, B., Cook, C., & Kyrillidou, M. (2005). Concurrent validity of LibQUAL ™ scores:what do LibQUAL ™ scores measure? The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(6) 517-522. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2005.08.002.

Tunde, O. K. & Issa, A. (2013). The quality of Nigerian higher education and the funding of library resources. Ozean Journal of Social Sciences. 6(2) 43-53.

Wade, M. and Hulland, J. (2004). The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for Future Research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1) 107-142.

Wang, S. (2012), Development of a service framework for library users from customer relationship management perspective. Chapters, in: Daniel Catalan-Matamoros (ed.) Advances in Customer Relationship Management, IntechOpen.

Wang, Z. & Tremblay, P. (2009). Going global: providing library resources and services to international sites. Journal of Library Administration, 9(1-2) .171-185.

Wanigasooriya, A.W.A.P.L. (2018). LibQUAL analysis of library services in university libraries in Sri Lanka. Journal of Teaching and Education. 8(1) 187–198.

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2) 171-181.

White, M.J., Abels, E.G. & Nitecki, D.A. (1994). Measuring customer satisfaction and quality of service in special libraries. Report of the research project submitted to University of Maryland.

Wilson, F. (2013). The Quality Maturity Model : assessing organisational quality culture in academic libraries [Ph.D. thesis]. School of Information Systems, Computing and Mathematics Brunel University.

Wijetunge, W.A.D.S. (2016). Service quality, competitive advantage and business performance in service providing SMEs in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 6(7) 720-728.

Wright, P. M., & McMahan, G. C. (1992). Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. Journal of Management, 18(2), 295–320. doi:10.1177/014920639201800205.

Yang, Y. & Konrad, A. M. (2011). Understanding diversity management practice: Implications for institutional theory and resource-based theory. Group & Organization Management. 36(1) pp.6–38.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item