Bases de datos y sistemas de IA para tesis doctorales

Codina, Lluís, Aguilera-Cora, Elisenda and Lopezosa, Carlos Bases de datos y sistemas de IA para tesis doctorales., 2024 . In Seminarios de formación para programas de master y doctorado. [Presentation]

[thumbnail of bases-de-datos-sistemas-ia-trabajos-academicos-2024.pdf]
Preview
 Text
bases-de-datos-sistemas-ia-trabajos-academicos-2024.pdf
Download (7MB) | Preview

English abstract

Main aspects of the use of academic databases and generative artificial intelligences in academic work under the lens of ethics and critical thinking. Review of how to use Scopus and Web of Science. Discussion of intervention points (loci) for databases and artificial intelligence systems: introduction, theoretical framework, state of the art, methodological framework, and discussion. Review of six key aspects of working with artificial intelligence systems: sources, attribution, verification, linking, search spaces, and privacy. Presentation of the main phases and procedures for using generative artificial intelligences in academic work. Characteristics of AI systems for academic use. The problem of attribution as a new source of plagiarism, whether voluntary or involuntary. Evaluation: variables, phases, and procedures.

Spanish abstract

Aspectos principales en el uso de bases de datos académicas y de inteligencias artificiales generativas en trabajos académicos bajo la luz de la ética y el pensamiento crítico. Revisión de la forma de utilizar Scopus y Web ofScience. Discusión de los puntos de intervención (loci) de las bases de datos y de los sistemas de inteligencia artificial: introducción, marco teórico, estado de la cuestión, marco metodológico y discusión. Revisión de seis puntos principales de trabajo con sistemas de inteligencia artificial: fuentes, atribución, verificación, vinculación, espacios de búsqueda, privacidad. Presentación de las fases y los procedimientos principales del uso de inteligencias artificiales generativas para trabajos académicos. Características de los sistemas de IA para uso académico. El problema de la atribución como nueva fuente de plagio, voluntario o involuntario. Evaluación: variables, fases y procedimientos.

Item type: Presentation
Keywords: Academic databases; Scopus; Web of Science; generative artificial intelligence; Perplexity; Elicit; academic works; plagiarism; chain of attribution; ethics; critical thinking; citation; citación; bases de datos académicas, inteligencia artificial; pensamiento crírico, trabajos académicos; plagio
Subjects: I. Information treatment for information services
L. Information technology and library technology
Depositing user: Dr Lluís Codina
Date deposited: 26 Nov 2024 08:53
Last modified: 26 Nov 2024 08:53
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/46201

References

Aguilera-Cora, E., Lopezosa, C., Fernández-Cavia, J., & Codina, L. (2024). Accelerating research processes with Scopus AI: A place branding case study. Revista Panamericana De Comunicación, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.21555/rpc.v6i1.3088 1

Aguilera-Cora, E., Lopezosa, C., & Codina, L. (2024). Scopus AI BetaFunctional analysis and cases. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Departament de Comunicació. (Serie Editorial DigiDoc. DigiDoc Reports). https://repositori.upf.edu/handle/10230/58658 1

Bianchini, S., Müller, M., & Pelletier, P.(2022). Artificial intelligence in science: An emerging general method of invention. Research Policy, 51(10), 104604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104604 1

Bhatia, P.(2023). ChatGPT for academic writing: A game changer or a disruptive tool? Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology, 39(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_84_23 1

Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1).https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8 1

Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J. S., Eirug, A., Galanos, V., Ilavarasan, P. V., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Kar, A. K., Kizgin, H., Kronemann, B., Lal, B., Lucini, B., . . . Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002 1

Eager, Bron(2023). Academic Writing AI Prompt Phrasebook : 500+ Example Prompts to Accelerate Academic Writing and Research (English Edition) (p. 7). Ediciónde Kindle. 1

Elsevier.(2023, August 1). Elsevier takes Scopus to the next level with generative AI.https://www.elsevier.com/about/press-releases/elsevier-takes-scopus-to-the-next-level-with-generative-ai 1

Elsevier. (2024, January, 16). Launch of Scopus AI to Help Researchers Navigate the World of Research.https://www.elsevier.com/about/press-releases/launch-of-scopus-ai-to-help-researchers-navigate-the-world-of-research 1

Gundersen, O. E., Gil, Y., & Aha, D. W.(2018). On Reproducible AI: Towards Reproducible Research, open Science, and digital scholarship in AI publications. AI Magazine, 39(3), 56–68.https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v39i3.2816 1

High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. (2019, April 8). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI.https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai 1

Kaebnick, G. E., Magnus, D., Kao, A., Hosseini, M., Resnik, D. B., Dubljević, V., Rentmeester, C. A., Gordijn, B., & Cherry, M. J.(2023). Editors’ _statement on the responsible use of generative AI technologies in scholarly journal publishing. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy, 26(4), 499–503.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-023-10176-6 1

Lopezosa, C., & Codina, L. (2023). Probando Bard: así funciona la Inteligencia Artificial Generativa de Google. Anuario Think EPI, 17.https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2023.e17a25 1

Lopezosa, C., Codina, L., & Ferran-Ferrer, N. (2023, February 1). Chat GPT como apoyo a las systematic scoping reviews: integrando la inteligencia artificial con el framework SALSA. http://hdl.handle.net/2445/193691 1

Lopezosa, C., Codina, L., & Boté-Vericad, JJ. (2023). Testeando ATLAS.ti con OpenAI: hacia un nuevo paradigma para el análisis cualitativo de entrevistas con inteligencia artificial. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Departament de Comunicació. (Serie Editorial DigiDoc. DigiDoc Reports). https://repositori.upf.edu/handle/10230/56449 1

Lund, B., Wang, T., Mannuru, N. R., Nie, B., Shimray, S. R., & Wang, Z. (2023). ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(5), 570–581.https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24750 1

Tlili, A., Huang, R., Mustafa, M. Y., Zhao, J., Bozkurt,_ A., XU,L.,_… Wang, H.(2023). Speaking of transparency: Are all Artificial Intelligence (AI) literature reviews in education transparent?. The Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching (JALT), 6(2). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.15 1

UNESCO.(2023, September 8). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/guidance-generative-ai-education-and-research 1

Whitfield, S., & Hofmann, M. A.(2023). Elicit: AI literature review research assistant. Public Services Quarterly, 19(3), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2023.2224125 1

World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology. (2019). Preliminary study on the ethics of artificial intelligence. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000367823 1


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS