Escuela de editores: Implicaciones y políticas editoriales de la inteligencia artificial

Machin-Mastromatteo, Juan-D. Escuela de editores: Implicaciones y políticas editoriales de la inteligencia artificial. Revista Estudios de la Información, 2023, vol. 1, n. 2, pp. 123-133. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of 2.pdf]
Preview
 Text
2.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (414kB) | Preview

English abstract

In this entry of the School of editors section, I present some of the issues surrounding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in research to frame the synthesis and analysis of ten editorial policies on the use of AI: arXiv, Elsevier, Emerald Publishing, International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, Oxford University Press, Sage, Springer Nature, Taylor & Francis Group, Wiley and World Association of Medical Editors. I address how large language models, such as ChatGPT, have affected the integrity and originality of scientific products, examining issues such as AI training, its use in scientific authoring, the accuracy of AI-generated content, and the impact these technologies are having on scientific research and publishing. Current editorial policies on the use of AI emphasize the need to act with transparency if they are used, in addition to stressing authors’ responsibilities and the ethical and practical limitations of using AI in research. I conclude with a reflection about seeking a balance between the advantages and limitations of AI in order to be able to use it in scientific research and publication without compromising ethics and integrity values in science.

['eprint_fieldopt_linguabib_' not defined] abstract

En esta entrega de Escuela de editores presento algunas de las problemáticas alrededor del uso de la inteligencia artificial (IA) en la investigación para enmarcar la síntesis y análisis de diez políticas editoriales sobre el uso de IA: arXiv, Elsevier, Emerald Publishing, International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, Oxford University Press, Sage, Springer Nature, Taylor & Francis Group, Wiley y World Association of Medical Editors. Abordo cómo los modelos de lenguaje de gran tamaño, como ChatGPT, han afectado la integridad y originalidad de los productos científicos, examinando problemas como el entrenamiento de IA, su uso en la autoría de documentos científicos, la veracidad del contenido generado por IA y el impacto que están teniendo estas tecnologías en la investigación y publicación científica. Las mencionadas políticas editoriales actuales sobre el uso de IA enfatizan la necesidad de actuar con transparencia sobre su uso, además de subrayar la responsabilidad de los autores y las limitaciones éticas y prácticas de usar IA en la investigación. Concluyo con una reflexión acerca de buscar un equilibrio entre las ventajas y limitaciones de la IA para poder emplearla en la investigación y publicación científica sin faltar a valores de ética e integridad científicas.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: inteligencia artificial, modelos de lenguaje de gran tamaño, chatbots, investigación científica, escritura científica, publicación científica, políticas editoriales, directrices, ética en la investigación, integridad en la investigación
Subjects: E. Publishing and legal issues.
H. Information sources, supports, channels.
Depositing user: Dr. Juan-D. Machin-Mastromatteo
Date deposited: 10 Jul 2025 03:06
Last modified: 10 Jul 2025 03:06
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/46945

References

arXiv. (2023). arXiv announces new policy on ChatGPT and similar tools. https://blog.arxiv.org/2023/01/31/arxiv-announces-new-policy-on-chatgpt-and-similar-tools

Committee on Publication Ethics. (2023a). Artificial intelligence (AI) and fake papers. https://publicationethics.org/resources/forum-discussions/artificial-intelligence-fake-paper

Committee on Publication Ethics. (2023b). Authorship and AI tools: COPE position statement. https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author

Elsevier. (2023a). Guide for authors. Journal of Biotechnology. https://www.elsevier.com/journals/journal-of-biotechnology/0168-1656/guide-for-authors

Elsevier. (2023b). Publishing ethics. https://beta.elsevier.com/about/policies-and-standards/publishing-ethics

Elsevier. (2023c). The use of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in writing for Elsevier. https://beta.elsevier.com/about/policies-and-standards/the-use-of-generative-ai-and-ai-assisted-technologies-in-writing-for-elsevier

Emerald Publishing. (2023). Publishing ethics: Find out more about publication ethics and our policies. https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/publish-with-us/ethics-integrity/research-publishing-ethics

Heikkilä, M. (2023). Why detecting AI-generated text is so difficult (and what to do about it). MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/02/07/1067928/why-detecting-ai-generated-text-is-so-difficult-and-what-to-do-about-it

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2023). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. https://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf

Kung, T., Cheatham, M., Medenilla, A., Sillos, C., De Leon, L., Elepaño, C., Madriaga, M., Aggabao, R., Diaz-Candido, G., Maningo, J., y Tseng, V. (2023). Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLOS Digital Health, 2(2), e0000198. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198

Kung, T., Cheatham, M., Medenilla, A., Sillos, C., De Leon, L., Elepaño, C., Madriaga, M., Aggabao, R., Diaz-Candido, G., Maningo, J., y Tseng, V. (2022). Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. MedRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.19.22283643

Machin-Mastromatteo, J. D. [Juantífico]. (20 de abril de 2022). ¿Spam en Google Académico? [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/1lN1R0aV4BU

Orduña Malea, E. [@eomalea]. (24 de abril de 2023). I'm afraid to say that several preprint servers are publishing online papers, which cite publications co-authored by me that do not exist. This is the @chatgptimpact. Google Scholar and ResearchGate are indexing those papers, and their fake citations, by the way. [Tweet]. Twitter. https://twitter.com/eomalea/status/1650527418577309699

Oxford University Press. (2023). Ethics. Oxford Academic. https://academic.oup.com/pages/authoring/journals/preparing_your_manuscript/ethics

Sage. (2023). ChatGPT and generative AI: Use of large language models and generative AI tools in writing your submission. https://us.Sagepub.com/en-us/nam/chatgpt-and-generative-ai

Spinak, E. (2023). ¿Es que la Inteligencia Artificial tiene alucinaciones? SciELO en Perspectiva. https://blog.scielo.org/es/2023/12/20/es-que-la-inteligencia-artificial-tiene-alucinaciones

Springer Nature. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI). Nature Portfolio. https://www.nature.com/nature-portfolio/editorial-policies/ai

Tang, G., y Eaton, S. (2023). A rapid investigation of artificial intelligence generated content footprints in scholarly publications. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3253789/v1

Taylor & Francis Group. (2023). Defining authorship in your research paper: Co-authors, corresponding authors, and affiliations. Author Services. https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/editorial-policies/defining-authorship-research-paper

Tsai, C.., Yeh, Y., Tsai, L., y Chou, E. (2023). The efficacy of transvaginal ultrasound-guided BoNT-A external sphincter injection in female patients with underactive bladder. Toxins, 15(3), 199. http://doi.org/10.3390/toxins15030199

Villegas-Ceballos, S. [Santiago Villegas-Ceballos]. (2 de diciembre de 2023). Inteligencia Artificial en Bibliotecas - Introducción 2023-12 [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_klpXNc7vKw

Wiley. (2023). Best practice guidelines on research integrity and publishing ethics. https://authorservices.wiley.com/ethics-guidelines/index.html

World Association of Medical Editors. (2023). Chatbots, generative AI, and scholarly manuscripts: WAME recommendations on chatbots and generative artificial intelligence in relation to scholarly publications. https://wame.org/page3.php?id=106


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS