Small science journals : stay alert for potentially dangerous information

De Castro, Paola and Napolitani Cheyne, Federica (2006) Small science journals : stay alert for potentially dangerous information. [Journal Article (On-line/Unpaginated)]

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
26Kb Language: English

Abstract(s)

Bioterrorism has become a key subject in global communication, forcing the scientific community to urgently deal with problems of security and publishing of potentially dangerous information. This short note suggests that while editors of big science journals, supported by a rigorous peer-review system, seem to be generally aware of security implications and how to handle them, greater attention to security issues should be paid in the editing of small science journals and of institutional reports as well, where sensitive information is more likely to be published. Some practical suggestions are also recommended to help evaluate when the potential harm of publication outweighs its benefits and therefore a submitted paper should be modified or even not published.


Item Type:Journal Article (On-line/Unpaginated)
Keywords:Dangerous information, peer review, security, editorial responsibilities, science journals, institutional reports
Subjects:E. Publishing and legal issues. > EB. Printing, electronic publishing, broadcasting.
E. Publishing and legal issues. > EE. Intellectual freedom.
E. Publishing and legal issues. > EF. Censorship.
Full Metadata:Show all fields
ID Code:6115
Deposited By:De Castro, Paola
Deposited On:26 Apr 2006
Last Modified:19 Nov 2008 10:13
Statistics:View statistics for this eprint

Journal Editors and Authors Group. Statement on Scientific Publication and Security. (Editorial). 2003. Science 21 February;299(5610):1149.

Falkow S, Kennedy D. Science Publishing and Security Concern. (Letter). 2003. Science 2 May;300(5620):737-9.

Keel BA. Protecting America’s secrets while maintaining academic freedom. 2004. Acad Med 79(4)333-42.

Censoring science. 2003. Can Med Assoc J 168(12):1517.

Marshall E. Biodefense experts warn against censoring basic science. 2004. Science 306(5704):2022.

Openness in biomedical research collides with heightened security concerns. 2003. JAMA 289(6):686, 689-90.

Falkaw S. “Statement on scientific publication and security” fails to provide necessary guidelines. 2003 PNAS 100(100):5575.

Marusic A, Marusic M. Small scientific journals from small countries: Breaking from a vicious circle of inadequacy. 1999. Cr Med J 40(4):508-14.

Wager E, Godlee F, Jefferson T. How to survive peer review. 2002. London: BMJ Books.

Archive Staff Only: edit this record