Software libre para repositorios institucionales: propuestas para un modelo de evaluación de prestaciones

Tramullas, Jesús and Garrido Picazo, Piedad Software libre para repositorios institucionales: propuestas para un modelo de evaluación de prestaciones. El Profesional de la Información, 2006, vol. 15, n. 3, pp. 171-181. [Journal article (Paginated)]


Download (397kB) | Preview

English abstract

Institutional repositories have become an important means of publishing, disseminating, and preserving the digital information of organisations. The majority of them run on open software tools. Institutional repository projects are being carried out following an evaluation of the software’s features. Nevertheless, the evaluations to date have been comparative, focussing on the features offered by each tool, rather than on other factors. In order to overcome this limitation, this work analyses the different published models for evaluating institutional repository software, studies the approach adopted in each case, and proposes a model. This model is oriented toward the study and definition of informational–documental processes, the users, the characteristics of the collections, and the context of the project in which it is framed.

Spanish abstract

Los repositorios institucionales se han convertido en la principal forma de publicar, preservar y difundir la información digital de las organizaciones. La mayoría de ellos están soportados por software libre, elegidos tras la evaluación de sus prestaciones. Sin embargo, los análisis que se han realizado han sido comparativos, atendiendo a las funciones que ofrecen, antes que a otros factores. Para superar esta limitación, este trabajo analiza los diferentes modelos publicados de evaluación de software para repositorios institucionales, estudia los enfoques adoptados y propone un modelo orientado a la definición de procesos informativo–documentales, a la comunidad de usuarios, a las características de las colecciones, y al contexto del proyecto en el que se enmarcan.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Repositorios institucionales, Software libre, Evaluación de prestaciones. Institutional repositories, Open source software, Evaluation of features.
Subjects: I. Information treatment for information services
J. Technical services in libraries, archives, museum.
L. Information technology and library technology > LJ. Software.
Depositing user: Estrella Rentero Castillo
Date deposited: 15 May 2007
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:07


Anuradha, K. T. “Design and development of institutional repositories: a case study». En: The international information & library review, 2005, v. 37, n. 3, 2005, pp. 169–178.

Bailey, C. W. Open access bibliography: liberating scholarly literature with e–prints and open access journals. Annapolis: Association for Research Libraries, 2005.

Barton, M. R.; Waters, M. Creating an institutional repository: leaders workbook. MIT Libraries, 2004–2005.

Coleman, A.; Roback, J. R. “Open Access Federation for Library and Information Science: dLIST and DL–Harvest». En: D–lib magazine, 2005, v. 11, n. 12.

Corrado, E. M. “The importance of open access, open source, and open standards for libraries». En: Issues in science and technology librarianship, 2005, n. 42. Consultado en: 10–01–06.–spring/article2.html

Chawner, B. “F/OSS in the library world: an exploration». En: Open source application spaces: fifth workshop on open source software engineering (5–Wosse). ACM: St. Louis, 2005.

Crow, R. The case for institutional repositories: a Sparc position paper. Washington: The Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition, 2002. Consultado en: 12–01–06.

Crow, R. A guide to institutional repository software. New York: Open Society Institute, 2004.

De Robbio, A.; Subirats, I. “E–LIS: an international open archive towards building open digital libraries”. En: High energy physics libraries webzine, 2005, n. 11.

Dempsey, L. “The (digital) library environment: ten years after». En: Ariadne, 2006, n. 46.

Dill, E.; Palmer, K. L. “What’s the Big IDeA? Considerations for implementing an institutional repository». En: Library hi tech news incorporating online and cd notes, 2005, v. 22, n. 6, pp. 11–14.

Gonçalves, M. A.; Fox, E. A.; Watson, L. T.; Kipp, N. A. "Streams, structures, spaces, scenarios, societies (5s): a formal model for digital libraries". En: ACM transactions on information systems, 2004, v. 22, n. 2, pp. 270–312.

Han, Y. “Digital content management: the search for a content management system». En: Library hi tech, 2004, v. 22, n. 4, pp. 355–365.

ISO, Space data and information transfer systems–open archival information system–reference model. Ginebra: International Organization for Standardization, 2003.

Jones, R. D. “DSpace vs. ETD–db: choosing software to manage electronic theses and dissertations». En: Ariadne, 2004, n. 38.

Kim, J. «Finding documents in a digital institutional repository: DSpace and Eprints». En: Grove, A. (ed.). Proceedings 68th Annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (Asist), 2005, n. 42, 2005, Charlotte, NC (US). Consultado en: 22–01–06.

Koutsomitropoulos, D. A. [et al.]. “Towards the development of a general–purpose digital repository». En: Iceis, 2004, n. 5, pp. 271–278.

Lavoie, B. F. The open archival information system reference model: introductory guide. Dublin: OCLC, 2004. Consultado en: 22–01–06.

Lynch, C. A. «Institutional repositories: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age». En: ARL bimonthly report, 2003, n. 226.

NISO Framework Advisory Group. A framework of guidance for building good digital collections. Bethesda: National Information Standards Organization, 2004.

Nixon, W. “Daedalus: initial experiences with Eprints and DSpace at the University of Glasgow”. En: Ariadne, 2003, n. 37.

Open Archives Initiative, OAI Tools, 2005. Consultado en: 22–11–05.

Peters, T. A. «Digital repositories: individual, discipline–based, institutional, consortial, or national?». En: The journal of academic librarianship, 2002, v. 28, n. 6, pp. 414–417.

Powell, A. Notes about possible technical criteria for evaluating institutional repository (IR) software. Ukoln, University of Bath, 2005. Consultado en: 14–01–06.–systems/jisc–ie/arch/ir–software.pdf

Prudlo, M. “E–archiving: an overview of some repository management software tools». En: Ariadne, 2005, n. 43. Consultado en: 16–01–06.

Tramullas, J. “Open source tools for content management”. En: Hipertext. net, 2005, n. 3. Consultado en: 12–11–05.

Tramullas, J.; Garrido, P. “Los estudios de usuario en proyectos de biblioteca digital: una revisión de técnicas”. En: Actas de las 9as Jornadas españolas de documentación Infogestión, 2005, pp. 169–179.

Van de Sompel, H. [et al.]. “Rethinking scholarly communication. Building the system that scholars deserve». En: D–lib magazine, 2004, v. 10, n. 9. Consultado en: 06–05–05.

Velterop, J. M. Open access publishing and scholarly societies. New York: Open Society Institute, 2005. Consultado en: 14–12–05.

Wang, J. Y.; Assion, M.; Matthaei, B. Inventories–open archives software tools. Open Archives Forum, 2003. Consultado en: 12–05–04.–tools.pdf

Warner, S. “Eprints and the Open Archives Initiative”. En: Library hi tech, 2003, v. 21, n. 2, pp. 151–158.

Yeates, R. “Institutional repositories». En: VINE, 2003, v. 33, n. 2, pp. 96–101.


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item